On set, I got the feeling that the New Moon production was moving along at a faster clip than normal. It made sense, given that Weitz had an unusually tight window in which to film and edit the film, after which the third adaptation, Eclipse, would itself rush into production under director David Slade. So accordingly, the shooting schedule jumped back and forth between entirely unrelated scenes, as we moved directly from the Volturi chamber to the darkened Port Angeles street, where Bella would see visions of Edward trying to save her from imminent danger.
Robert Pattinson stood patiently against a green screen as Weitz rehearsed camera movements to film Bella's hallucinations. A long camera track ran the length of the stage, perhaps to use film speed techniques to create Edward's disorienting "appearance." A remote-controlled camera set on a mini crane moved fluidly to capture Pattinson, murmuring lines of stern warning.
At a nearby computer station, techs called up a previously-filmed scene: Bella on a darkened street, hopping on the back of a motorcycle. The Edward apparition was transposed into the background of the shot; computer generated effects would be added later to enhance the scene. What exactly the effect will look like is still up in the air.
"We are still in the late R&D phases of what Edward looks like when he's hit by sunlight, what the vampires look like when they're hit with sunlight, the diamond effect," Weitz told us by phone. "And also the hallucinatory effect that Bella has when she hears Edward's voice and she imagines him there." (Read our full interview with Chris Weitz here.)
The Edward-as-hallucination is a particularly good solution to the severe (some might say, tragic) lack of Edward in Meyer's source novel. When a distraught Bella finds herself in jeopardy in the book, she merely hears Edward's voice. When it will happen in the film, we'll actually get to see Edward -- an almost necessary fix, considering how Pattinson-less New Moon might be otherwise.
"New Moon is very internal," Rosenberg explained. "There's been a lot of talk about how Edward and the Cullens are not a part of the middle of New Moon, but actually they really are. Certainly, Edward's very much alive in Bella's mind throughout New Moon. As a reader, you feel his presence; he's helping drive that story."
She continued: "It's harder to do on film; you have to somehow find his presence and bring it there without having thought bubbles, constantly. And I think the solution that we found is going to satisfy fans. It's very much in keeping with the tone of the book, so it will be interesting...I think fans will feel pretty satisfied with what we're doing. One, because it's true to the book, and two, because we'll see more Edward! Can't be bad."
As with the first film, certain changes are necessary to fit the medium of film. Rosenberg's philosophy is that as long as the viewer's experience is the same, Meyer's book has been faithfully adapted.
"Things have to move out of an internal place and into an external, visual reality," she began, "so there are many things I changed. But as long as we hit the emotional experience, I think, it will resonate the same way. Twilight was that same thing. There were a lot of things that were in the book that weren't in the movie, but because we hit the emotional stepping stone all the way throughout, you took the same journey that you took with the characters in the book, and that's what's really most important about an adaptation; you have to take your audience on the same emotional journey, take your characters on the same emotional journey, as they do in the book and then everyone will have the same experience."
Check back Monday as we launch our regular "New Moon Mondays" series with Part 2 of our New Moon set visit, in which we spot Robert Pattinson's bare chest and see Edward get beat up, get kicked off set during a difficult scene, and speak with more cast and crew.
Click for more Twilight: New Moon coverage on RT, including our recent interview with director Chris Weitz.
And why not peruse more New Moon set reports? Check out different takes from our friends:
The Twilight Saga: New Moon Set Visit - Day One at HitFix.com
The Twilight Saga: New Moon Set Visit Part 1 at Fandango.com
New Moon Set Visit: A Fan's Perspective at MSN.com.
Vampires in Vancouver: All the Details From Our 'New Moon' Set Visit at Hollywood.com
Related Items
| Movie: | Twilight |
|
whitey_mcwhite writes: on Jul 17 2009 04:26 PM How about we forget the New Moon write up and we get the last installment of Deconstructing Harry which we should have gotten on Wednesday? Where is it Matt????!!!!!! (Reply to this) |
|
Jen Yamato writes: on Jul 17 2009 04:40 PM Hmm. While I understand your anticipation of the last Deconstructing Harry article, I cannot comply. More New Moon! (Reply to this) |
|
tai0316 writes: on Jul 17 2009 04:48 PM Great article! I'm feeling more and more confident that New Moon will be better than Twilight was. (Reply to this) |
|
Bigbrother writes: on Jul 17 2009 04:55 PM In reply to this comment (#2528234) I think it almost has to be. Twilight, aside from the casting was a pretty mediocre adaption which was severely shortchanged on the budget. For New Moon, we're getting the same cast, same story, but a lot more money put into making it good. Should be an easy success. One of my few concerns is the ability of the film to maintain Victoria as a credible villain with limited screen time. She wasn't exactly overdeveloped in the first movie and I have to think Robert Pattinson is going to enjoy most of the manufactured screen time. I just hope by the time Ecclipse rolls around we won't be like "Oh yeah, Victoria. Kinda forgot about her". (Reply to this) |
|
Jen Yamato writes: on Jul 17 2009 05:47 PM Bigbrother, I wouldn't worry too much about Victoria. Rosenberg has alluded to taking the liberty mentioned here to insert more of the missing characters - Victoria, the Cullens - in the film... Rachelle on set spoke with us about the extensive stunt work she was doing, so they certainly kept her busy. (Reply to this) |
|
kaitune writes: on Jul 17 2009 05:59 PM I wonder though that when they do 'Breaking Dawn', are they going to adapt it according to the book or are they going to change things........ I am not much of a Twilight fan, but I am not a hater and I read almost anything I can get my hands on. The books are entertaining in a guilty pleasure way. However, 'Breaking Dawn' book sucks a hell lot. Even my mom and my friends who are Twlight fans hate the last book to death. I have no idea how they might be able to edit out the crappiness of the plot, but I wish that they would do it somehow. 'Twilight' was a so-so film, but 'New Moon' 's trailer looks great. Since I know that I would have to see this film with my friends (and again with my mom), I hope that it would be a much better film. (Reply to this) |
|
Janice Aries writes: on Jul 17 2009 06:14 PM I agree with Whitey-Mcwhite... gimme the Deconstruction Potter Day 6! :D (Reply to this) |
|
GST writes: on Jul 17 2009 06:29 PM Evil, evil, EVIL! Somebody needs to make a Twilight/Buffy the Vampire Slayer crossover, I'd love to see Buffy show Bella how a REAL woman deals with pretty boy creepy vampires. (no offense Jen... I think?) (Reply to this) |
|
Sean H. writes: on Jul 17 2009 08:32 PM If your male and you like this movie/book series then well......your a douche bag. And not just any douche. Like, Summer's Eve' douche. Maybe even a nice Spring Fresh Linen scent. But a douche none the less! Goodnight Cleveland!!!! (Reply to this) |
|
Dreamer S. writes: on Jul 17 2009 09:09 PM Needs more Potter. But I am kind of interested in how Pattinson got kicked off set. (Reply to this) |
|
Shauna R. writes: on Jul 17 2009 09:26 PM Thanks Jen for providing us more New Moon news and not the billionth Potter article! I appreciate it! (Reply to this) |
|
John A. writes: on Jul 18 2009 02:40 AM I think writing "your" when "you're" is grammatically correct (twice in the same post) is far more douchy than liking Twilight. Don't get me wrong, Twilight does suck, just not as bad as grammatical errors. (Reply to this) |
|
Melissa K. writes: on Jul 18 2009 06:44 AM It won't be hard for Wietz to do a better job than Catherine with New Moon... but I hope he does a MUCH better job... I have confidence, I've liked everything I've seen thus far. If the movie is half as good as the book this time around I predict a much bigger box office draw for it... Look how much Twilight made and that was ONLY because of the books... (Reply to this) |
|
Bigbrother writes: on Jul 18 2009 06:58 AM In reply to this comment (#2528296) You seem to know a lot about douche my friend. Perhaps first hand knowledge? (Reply to this) |
|
Sean H. writes: on Jul 18 2009 08:54 AM Internet grammer? Ha! You can't be serious. And yes, it does seem like first hand knowledge yea? Bah, I remember when the retorts were at least kinda witty... (Reply to this) |
|
Sean H. writes: on Jul 18 2009 08:55 AM In reply to this comment (#2528356) I love you too! (Reply to this) |
|
JettaJameson writes: on Jul 18 2009 10:13 AM In reply to this comment (#2528296) If you're going to insult people, perhaps learning the difference between "your" and "you're" would be a good idea, first. You're the one who looks like the douche. (Reply to this) |
|
jacog writes: on Jul 18 2009 12:18 PM I opened this thread expecting to find people insulting the franchise and its fans, and I did. Sean H. - you are the crusty remains of an over-spiced chilli's hasty exit from the rear-end of a coyote that found this meal unwittingly in the garbage heap of an organ disposal unit. Your journey through life is like watching an asthmatic gerbil attempt to suck an olive through a straw - could be entertaining, but ultimately of no use to anyone. When your relatives hug you hello, they make it brief, for they are reminded of what it's like to squeeze the bloody puss out of a bulbous boil. (Reply to this) |
|
Bigbrother writes: on Jul 18 2009 02:50 PM Yes my friend, because calling someone a douchebag for reading something is the height of wit. Bravo Sir. You have really put us all in our place. (Reply to this) |
|
Bigbrother writes: on Jul 18 2009 02:52 PM Thanks for the info Jen, now I only worry that they're not going to stick close enough to the novels to satisfy the hardcore fans who have made the original a success. As you can probably tell I'm determined to find something to worry about so I don't go into this too content. (Reply to this) |
| You must be registered to post comments. Login or Register. |









