Average Rating: 4.7/10
Reviews Counted: 109
Fresh: 23 | Rotten: 86
Despite its sportsmanlike swagger, Two for the Money's aimless plot isn't worth betting on.
Average Rating: 5.3/10
Critic Reviews: 29
Fresh: 5 | Rotten: 24
Despite its sportsmanlike swagger, Two for the Money's aimless plot isn't worth betting on.
liked it
Average Rating: 3.1/5
User Ratings: 83,295
D.J. Caruso's Two for the Money stars Matthew McConaughey as Brandon Lang, a former college quarterback whose life plans changed when he suffered a career-ending injury. Brandon turns out to have remarkable skill at picking winning football bets. Eventually, he comes to the attention of Walter Abrams (Al Pacino), a very successful business tycoon who runs a giant gambling operation. Walter brings Brandon to New York and introduces him to a glitzy, fast-paced, money-drenched lifestyle that
Oct 7, 2005 Wide
Jan 17, 2006
$22.9M
Universal Pictures
All Critics (122) | Top Critics (31) | Fresh (23) | Rotten (88) | DVD (21)
Original screenwriting gives way to clichés, and the resolution, while offering closure, seems false -- too much a case of the filmmakers wanting to have their cake and eat it, too.
It really works as a study of gambling.
The movie has a lot of built-in flash and is thus mildly entertaining, though the running time grinds it down.
Pacino is having a blast, and so might the viewer, at least until our scenery muncher finally gobbles all the foliage mid-way through the picture.
Big, loud, glossy and entertaining.
The movie makes a bet that the filmmakers can't cover.
Even at his worst Al Pacino can charm the birds from the trees, but in "Two For The Money" pigeons are the only species visiting.
Movie about gambling in sports is for adults only.
While there are parts of Two for the Money worth watching, it's ultimately not one worth putting your money on.
Por trás de uma trama aparentemente convencional, esconde-se um inteligente estudo de personagem beneficiado pela estupenda atuaçăo de Pacino (que conta também com o belo desempenho de seu companheiro de elenco, McConaughey).
The initial set-up is interesting enough but the film rapidly loses its way in the middle and ends up a horribly confused mess, with sub-plots and entire characters simply disappearing into thin air.
Pacino's performance is only a few degrees shy of full-bore scenery-chewing, but the veteran actor stomps through this movie like a small Italian Godzilla.
The thing about a business that makes and sells picks to sports bettors is that, technically, it's not gambling... except for the fact that it is. What was good about this film was the recovered gambling addict (Pacino) and his wife, the poorly acted but more-or-less believable ex-drug addict (Russo). They walked and
April 27, 2007Super Reviewer
| 35% | The Hangover Part II |
| 25% | Twilight Saga: Breaking Dawn Par... |
| 81% | Kung Fu Panda 2 |
| 44% | Cowboys & Aliens |
| 83% | Rise of the Planet of the Apes |
| 25% | Twilight Saga: Breaking Dawn Par... |
| 88% | Lady and the Tramp |
| 69% | A Very Harold & Kumar Christmas |
| 21% | Fireflies in the Garden |
| 45% | The Rebound |
What are his 10 best movies ever?
See the all-new action-packed trailer!
Five new Marvelous pictures
Unconventional Superheroes