"It's more like the flashback scenes in 2," said Rosenberg. "Remember in the first one Michael Sheen's wife Sonia was killed by Bill Nighy, by Viktor, and that was his daughter? That was the back-story for Michael Sheen. Obviously this is how they meet and Michael Sheen becomes the leader of the werewolves. This is told from the werewolf's perspective, not the vampire's. It's their story and their battle with Viktor."
Rosenberg assured that this departure was consistent in the original plans for an Underworld trilogy, and that a fourth film with Kate Beckinsale and Scott Speedman is still possible.
"I think it's the strongest story that we've put together of the three. I think it's really terrific. I think it leads to a fourth. When we did the first Underworld, we imagined three: the first one, a sequel and then a prequel. The third is a prequel, so the fourth would carry on where Kate and Scott Speedman left off after 2, so I think this is going to be terrific."
Related Items
| Celeb: | Tom Rosenberg |
|
Gimy writes: on Jan 15 2008 11:50 AM i thought it was 1 2 3 4...apparently its 2 3 1 4...hmmm. i must have gone to the wrong school. out of Van Helsing, Underworld and Blade...this is the least likeable series i think. take away the hot chic, and i'm not sure you have as good of an idea as ya think. gimme another Blade... (Reply to this) |
|
Pilgermann writes: on Jan 15 2008 11:54 AM zzzzzzzzzzz (Reply to this) |
|
Lux Obscura writes: on Jan 15 2008 12:19 PM man the second one was soooo bad. I think it could have been done well, but was utter crap. (Reply to this) |
|
jaqu7 writes: on Jan 15 2008 12:19 PM The Blade movies are terrible. (Well, the first one is so-so.) (Reply to this) |
|
darrinsgoodman writes: on Jan 15 2008 12:24 PM no kate no date for me (Reply to this) |
|
POJOFOSHO writes: on Jan 15 2008 12:29 PM Everyone lay off. These movies are sweet. Better than Van Helsing are you kidding me? That movie was laughable. At least these movies have sweet rated R action. What are you expecting a feel good story here? I expect nothing less than werewolves and vampires kicking the crap out of each other. I'll be upset if they try to make it any more meaningful than that. (Reply to this) |
|
Ruckas356 writes: on Jan 15 2008 12:33 PM The 1st one was good, then the second was just forgetable. and not really excited for anymore infact i dont care at all. (Reply to this) |
|
OperaGhost21 writes: on Jan 15 2008 12:38 PM I actually enjoyed both of the Underworld movies. I'll wait and reserve judgement on this one until the trailer surfaces, but I certainly don't mind the idea of another film or two for the franchise. (Reply to this) |
|
kissman24 writes: on Jan 15 2008 01:00 PM I am an Underworld fan, but I am really uneasy about an Underworld without Kate Beckinsale. She is such an important ingredient in why this franchise is so successful. I'd feel better if I knew that before I pay for my ticket to see this that Kate Beckinsale is officially on board for a 4th Underworld film. Otherwise, I will probably go into this one believing that this film was created because it was the only option they had left to go with the story. (Reply to this) |
|
nogard46 writes: on Jan 15 2008 01:03 PM yeah wow put the crack pipe down! No kate in underworld? Yeah how about we make POTC 4 with no Johnny Depp? or lets make another Borne movie with out Matt Damon as Jason Borne? How about Shrek 4 without Mike Meyers as Shrek? Kate beck in UW is about the single most sexiest damn thing ever in all of cinematic history. (well mayeb Fey Wray in King kong a close second) come on everybody! We WANT KATE! WE WANT KATE! (Reply to this) |
|
Pengoo writes: on Jan 15 2008 01:24 PM 1 was a pretty awesome action movie and had an interesting story to boot. 2...i can barely remember what happened, so that's never good. If three had some good buzz around it, I'd probably see that, and if it did well enough and 3 really set it up, i'd like to see some big conclusion. (Reply to this) |
|
jmo2ski writes: on Jan 15 2008 01:40 PM both of the underworld movies were great, and now it is even going to be more interesting hearing things from lycan's (werewolves) perspective. We can expect a lot of gore and less tight leather suits (sigh, no kate beckinsale) (Reply to this) |
|
DON OF THE D.E.D writes: on Jan 15 2008 02:13 PM Underworld sucks! (Reply to this) |
|
Oblivioncry writes: on Jan 15 2008 02:23 PM underworld 1 was ok, 2 sucked sooo hard blade 1 was ok (the first 10 minutes are awesome but from then it goes downhill) underworld prequel.......if it looks as staged and bad as the past part in Underworld 2, no thx (Reply to this) |
|
rle4lunch writes: on Jan 15 2008 02:38 PM underworld 2 was a thrown together mess of a movie. lay off blade. underworld 1&2 don't have anything on that series. Even Trinity was better than underwold 1. (Reply to this) |
|
South Texas Terror writes: on Jan 15 2008 02:40 PM Ill take Blade 1 over any of the underworld movies and van helsing (I hope they dont make HVII). Plus I liked the techno with fight scenes. (Reply to this) |
|
Oblivioncry writes: on Jan 15 2008 02:53 PM though i have to say underworld 1 had sooo much potential but failed ultimately. (Reply to this) |
|
nathanpoitras writes: on Jan 15 2008 04:09 PM Instead of focusing on werewolves, the writers should try to focus on making a movie that isn't absolutely terrible like the first two. It is projects just like these that make me feel little to no sympathy for the WGA. (Reply to this) |
|
Floor Man writes: on Jan 15 2008 04:47 PM Bleh. I certainly support the WGA strike, but I'd love it if the writers could come back to write stories that are really better than this. Gah! Where, oh, where has the originality gone? (Reply to this) |
|
VibTDog writes: on Jan 15 2008 04:55 PM garbage. (Reply to this) |
| You must be registered to post comments. Login or Register. |









