Article Ratings & Comments
(1-20 of 107 posts) | Reply
on May 29 2009 11:20 AM Fail. (Reply to this) |
on May 29 2009 11:24 AM wtf is salon.com? (Reply to this) |
|
on May 29 2009 11:33 AM Congratulations on seeing past the gloss. Lets understand this is really a senior on a cruise having to fight off all the locals. And always returning to the safety of the ship. Bad Bad locals, damn foreigners. Congratulations on seeing the manipulations too. (Reply to this) |
|
on May 29 2009 11:51 AM Why ... why do you hate children, senior citizens, balloons and animals? (Reply to this) |
|
on May 29 2009 12:09 PM God you are death to all of us. (Reply to this) |
on May 29 2009 12:22 PM Give me a break. You're only giving it a rotten rating to be different and because you want attention (Reply to this) |
on May 29 2009 12:23 PM TU eres una PUUUUUUUTAAAAA!!!!!!!!! Fak YOU Fauk YOU FAUK YOU!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! YOU ARE SOOOO predictable you stupid BYTCH!!!! You are #2 on my most hated critics list, after Armond Neon-White (Reply to this) |
|
on May 29 2009 12:34 PM how can you possibly be a Top Critic? WTF is salon.com and what gives you the right to be a movie critic? Are you at the top of a tall building? Do me a favor, JUMP OFF! (Reply to this) |
on May 29 2009 12:39 PM Funny, I saw it last night and it was actually one of the more organic, poignant Pixar films. The charms were precise (in a good way) but not surgical. (Reply to this) |
|
on May 29 2009 12:42 PM And in your positive review of Night At The Museum 2, you praise that it "refuses to be a stiff, lifeless relic," almost the opposite of what you say about Up. On the contrary, I think Night At The Museum was the dry, surgical film. (Reply to this) |
|
on May 29 2009 12:59 PM In reply to this comment (#2522750) Salon.com is a pretentious online magazine that reviews films, books and stuff. (Reply to this) |
|
on May 29 2009 01:09 PM You also loved Twilight & hated The Dark Knight. Your opinion sucks sh*t. (Reply to this) |
|
on May 29 2009 01:19 PM It could be that your reaction to this movie was because you are a heartless pretentious b*tch. Not sure, but that could be it. (Reply to this) |
|
on May 29 2009 01:38 PM "UP" left you cold, Stephanie? Wow. I thought it was not only expertly crafted, but it was enormously heartfelt. Did you fly to the movie theater on your broomstick? (Reply to this) |
|
on May 29 2009 01:50 PM How dare you have an opinion! (Reply to this) |
on May 29 2009 01:56 PM I agree, Pixar sucks. But seriously, kill yourself. (Reply to this) |
|
on May 29 2009 01:56 PM Unbelievable! I believe anyone who wasn't charmed by this movie to be soul-less. Go back to the underworld, where your idea of art and entertainment dwells. (Reply to this) |
|
on May 29 2009 01:57 PM Unbelievable! I believe anyone who wasn't charmed by this movie to be soul-less. Go back to the underworld, where your idea of art and entertainment dwells. (Reply to this) |
|
on May 29 2009 01:57 PM Sorry, ladies. Someone should have warned you that this movie is mostly for guys, women in great relationships, children, and people who own dogs. There are a lot of little things that people might miss out on; for example, when I was in boy scouts, they played this game on us call Snipe http I never really fell for it, but not everyone knows about it. There are a lot of parts of this movie that you have to be "in-the-know" to get. (Reply to this) |
|
on May 29 2009 02:21 PM This jerk also gave WALL-E a negative review. What an ***. (Reply to this) |
RSS Feeds