Article Ratings & Comments

|
PhilVillarreal writes: on Jun 25 2008 08:34 PM I mistakenly deleted my review and had to re-post it. I apologize to all the commenters whose posts were deleted. (Reply to this) |
|
Mik-e writes: on Jun 25 2008 08:43 PM you "mistakenly" deleted your review and coincidently all the negative comments vanished. XD that makes me laugh. (Reply to this) |
|
TOAO_Cyrus writes: on Jun 25 2008 08:55 PM That was an incredibily lame thing to do. (Reply to this) |
|
savethemooses writes: on Jun 25 2008 08:57 PM What's with this guy's hate for Pixar? Does he think he's edgy if he gives Pixar movies negative reviews because everybody else agrees that they're excellent? (Reply to this) |
|
Kermit Jagger writes: on Jun 25 2008 08:57 PM I'm sure you're trying to figure out how to make your review sound less harsh so you don't look like the only douche who thought the movie sucked. (Reply to this) |
|
xsonogall writes: on Jun 25 2008 09:14 PM In reply to this comment (#1812845) Obviously he did not since he resubmitted it as "rotten." And obviously he enjoys the attention. (Reply to this) |
|
kwreed668 writes: on Jun 25 2008 09:22 PM Phil Villarreal's review of Wall-E is about to send anyone who sees the film through the roof. I read the review twice (likely once more than you) and I can't get past the lack of genuine introspection and consideration that you failed to give this movie. Stating that Wall-E "(Is) not a thrill ride" is like saying %u201CThe God Father%u201D wasn%u2019t hilarious. Wall-E isn%u2019t a movie that hits you over the head with antics, there%u2019s a story going on here that%u2019s both poignant and endearing to adults and wide-eyed fascinating to younger viewers. This isn%u2019t a movie that will necessarily stick to your funnybone but it will, at least for ninety minutes, become part of your soul. To further confound your opinions, your video review states that the film is "visually resplendent" which, when I was going to college meant, "radiant" and dazzling" yet drags too much at times. Also, Mr. Villarreal you say, "Wall-E has the silent clown sensibilities of Buster Keaton." I heartily agree, and although I wouldn't go ahead and call your comment plagiarism in the first degree, it is interesting to me that even the New York Daily News attributed that same comment to it%u2019s original source which was the studio press kit. I did get something distinctly refreshing out of this review however, and it was the realization that Mr. Villarreal is clearly one of those reviewers who deliberately go against the grain in the hopes that his lack of original thought will provoke the ire of the reader, or, be that special someone who gives a rave review to a real stinker in the hopes that he%u2019ll find his name under a blurb in a full-page studio ad. I can see it now, Phil Villareal call%u2019s %u201CNational Lampoon Gold Digger%u2019s II%u201D the funniest movie since Caddy Shack, more exciting that %u201CDie Hard%u201D and more heart warming than %u201COld Yeller.%u201D Gimme me a break. (Reply to this) |
|
tabascoman77 writes: on Jun 25 2008 09:26 PM Hey, Phil... ...dude...you just suck. Seriously. You just like to be the spoiler just like you were for Ratatouille. Here's a tip for you: why don't you "accidentally" delete your review and KEEP IT OFF...and then, your entire HARD DRIVE along with it. That way, we can enjoy this brilliant movie and we'd never have to read your crap-infested sludge ever again! :D (Reply to this) |
|
dystopiandweller writes: on Jun 25 2008 09:40 PM hahahahahah Phil, you know that was on purpose. The 70 comments embarrassed you, eh? (Reply to this) |
|
Chimera_lfe writes: on Jun 25 2008 09:42 PM yea, phil, you jerk! you're a jerk, you... jerky jerk! but seriously: (a) deleting all the neg. comments is just lame (b) ...lame.... (Reply to this) |
|
xsonogall writes: on Jun 25 2008 09:45 PM In reply to this comment (#1813004) Seems more like he wanted to *bump* his review up so as to not get lost in the deluge of positive ones coming right about now. (Reply to this) |
|
tekwar2001 writes: on Jun 25 2008 09:51 PM computer says no... (Reply to this) |
|
tobias1237 writes: on Jun 25 2008 09:51 PM You guys are complaining that he is doing it for attention, yet you are doing the exact thing you are critisizing him for by leaving all these posts. Funny. (Reply to this) |
|
maarch writes: on Jun 25 2008 09:55 PM let me get this straight, you didnt like movie like Pirates of the caribean or Wall-E but you did enjoy The Happenning...I think that say it all about how good of a critic you are (Reply to this) |
|
dystopiandweller writes: on Jun 25 2008 09:57 PM Well, tobias, I'm certainly paying attention to your comment also. You can't say you didn't do that for attention. You had a choice. Just sayin'. (Reply to this) |
|
yohoitsjoefosho writes: on Jun 25 2008 09:58 PM Apparently Mr. Villarreal found us all a threat. (Reply to this) |
|
wh smith writes: on Jun 25 2008 10:00 PM anyone that makes a career out of being a critic should be prepared to take it like they give it. i fail to comprehend how you "accidentally" deleted the review. what a hack. (Reply to this) |
|
ftf353 writes: on Jun 25 2008 10:03 PM LOL- "mistakenly" deleted your review my ***. Well since all the comments were also "mistakenly" deleted, allow me to comment again: You are a complete joke. You did the same thing last year with Ratatouille and no one takes you seriously as a reviewer. You just want to get attention by being the first one to have a rotten review. Your track record is horrible- here are movies he gave a higher score to than Wall-E: The Happening, Baby Mama, Yu-Gi-Oh: The Movie, When a Stranger Calls, 8 crazy nights, Monster-in-law, XXX:State of the union, Just Married, Resident Evil: Apocalypse, Into the Blue- I could go on and on. You have become a hack and everyone knows it. (Reply to this) |
|
maarch writes: on Jun 25 2008 10:04 PM In reply to this comment (#1813060) well it is quiet easy, you probably saw all the bad comment we gave it for beeing the only one saying this movie was rotten ( while others are stating it is the best movie of the year and one of top movie from Pixar ) and while beeing scare by all those bad review his hand pressed on the mouse and accidently deleted his review and all the comments with it...Poor guy he's probably nervous cause now he just realised that he slept while watching this movie, wich explain why he couldnt appreciate it (Reply to this) |
|
Michael Scott writes: on Jun 25 2008 10:05 PM you suck!!!!!! (Reply to this) |







