Warner Brothers invited select press to a special Watchmen "roadshow" event yesterday, during which director Zack Snyder screened 25-odd minutes of footage from his graphic novel adaptation. Among the bigger snippets of news to come out of the screening and subsequent Q&A session was the epic official run time of Snyder's Watchmen, which he said is currently clocking in at two hours and 43 minutes, though he also mentioned that the figure was not final.
But just what footage did Snyder choose to show off at the event? IGN Movies' Todd Gilchrist gives a detailed blow-by-blow account of the scenes shown (if you're spoiler-phobic, we recommend you skip to the end). In the film's opening scene, the aged Comedian (Jeffrey Dean Morgan) is attacked in his home by an unidentified assailant:
"Even at his clearly advanced age, Comedian fends for himself well: First he swings dexterously with punches and kicks that deter his opponent, and then tries to stab him with kitchen cutlery. But before he can claim victory, his unknown attacker disables him with a thunderous series of punches and kicks; and after shattering a marble countertop with Comedian's head, the assailant throws the aging superhero out of his apartment window. Glass shatters and cascades down around him as his body plummets to the ground below. Landing almost immediately after his body is Watchmen's trademark smiley-face button, which is quickly swallowed by the pool of blood that pours out of Comedian's bruised corpse."

IGN continues with descriptions of an opening credit montage showing the backstories of Watchmen's main characters, a scene in which Dr. Manhattan explains his own origin story, and a scene in which Nite Owl II and Silk Spectre II break Rorschach out of jail, which IGN describes as a "beautiful sequence shot from multiple angles at different film speeds." Read the full story.
Collider's Frosty was also quite taken with how Snyder filmed the Rorschach rescue scene. "One of the great things about the footage was the way Zack staged the fighting," he wrote. "Unlike some movies that cut too quick, or make it so you can't follow the action, this stuff was easy to follow and it looked like they were there doing the stunts and actually fighting. No quick cuts and shitty editing, this stuff was tight and together. Very impressive." Check out Collider's full report.

And if fans of Watchmen are concerned that the scope and intricacy of Alan Moore and Dave Gibbons' graphic novel cannot adequately be captured on film, CHUD's Devin Faraci offered some relief. After watching the Dr. Manhattan clip he wrote, "This ten minute segment is essentially an adaptation of one issue of the comic, and the fact that Snyder captures everything that he needs to capture in those ten minutes are the boldest testament to the fact that Watchmen is doable in a feature length film." Read more from CHUD here.

Elsewhere on the web, fanboy-level excitement began to foment. After the footage screening, First Showing's Alex Billington declared that Watchmen could, like The Matrix and The Dark Knight before it, be a transformative movie event. "I really believe it's going to be one of the few films in this century that truly pushes the boundaries of cinematic storytelling," he writes. "It's definitely going to give The Dark Knight a run for its money (only in the sense of being one of the best movies of all-time)."
|
Kokushi writes: on Oct 02 2008 11:30 AM I never heard of Watchmen before and after seeing the trailer i became a fan, it looks great and i hope it shown next year. (Reply to this) |
|
ScytheofAzrael writes: on Oct 02 2008 11:48 AM Oh, man, I wish I could have seen it. Sounds like the movie's shaping up to be amazing. Little worried though, when they compared it to 300. 300 was good in visual effects and action, but lacked a bit in other areas. Meh, maybe Snyder will pull this off. By the looks of it, it sounds like it's a hell of a ride. March IS too far. (Reply to this) |
|
Elixor writes: on Oct 02 2008 12:04 PM It's looking pretty amazing so far. If this turns out as good as reports like this are saying, I'm going to be stoked. It remains to be seen if the story comes out right. I hope it does, would be a shame if it doesn't. (Reply to this) |
|
jarbuckl writes: on Oct 02 2008 12:29 PM I'm so freaking pumped. The opening credits alone seem worth the price of admission. Good start. (Reply to this) |
|
jokerboy1991 writes: on Oct 02 2008 01:39 PM In reply to this comment (#2057959) You cant call yourself a fan if u have not read the book u fool! Amazing book, the footage sounds amazing. I still don' t think it could really be Watchmen if it was under 2 hours and 40 minutes. (Reply to this) |
|
reavus4983 writes: on Oct 02 2008 02:12 PM I really wanted to read this book but, call me shallow, the art seemed pretty dated for me, so after about 5 considerations actually holding the book in my hand, I still have not bought it for that reason. So can somebody assure me: is it good enough to warrant 20 bucks and a few hours of my time? Aside from that, the trailer looks very good. Hopefully it has the substance that 300 didn't have room for. (Reply to this) |
|
knowingtoast85 writes: on Oct 02 2008 02:30 PM As with Citizen Kane, to appreciate Watchmen you have to understand what comics were before it, and what they became after it. Even with that in mind, however, I think Watchmen stands on its own as one of the most thought-provoking, troublesome and immersive books I've ever read. Well, that and The Dirt, which was *****ing rad as sh*t. (Reply to this) |
|
jokerboy1991 writes: on Oct 02 2008 02:51 PM In reply to this comment (#2058324) The book is amazing! Read IT! (Reply to this) |
|
scarythecruel writes: on Oct 02 2008 03:04 PM Anyone that is interested in this movie really must read the book...there is nothing like it. From the sounds of it they have the look of it totally down, and the credits sound sweet, lol. I also just hope against hope that they dont screw up the story. (Reply to this) |
|
Looselycult writes: on Oct 02 2008 03:33 PM I thought Watchmen was interesting and dense, but somewhat portentous. Don't get me wrong it's a very well thought out and well written comic, but it's almost confusing on purpose. It's almost as if Moore did this so he could prove how smart and above people he was when he wrote it. It reminded me of a lot of the self-important modern literary fiction of the 20th century like Pynchon or even Joyce where it likes to basks in it's own self reverential importance along with the genera's typical nihilism and left wing or should I say Anarchistic politics. It just left a bad taste in my mouth. Why do I get the feeling that I just attacked a sacred cow? (Reply to this) |
|
jpbresnihan writes: on Oct 02 2008 03:35 PM the cut right now is 2 hour 45 minutes. lets hope they dont cut it down anymore. (Reply to this) |
|
tekwar2001 writes: on Oct 02 2008 03:55 PM I just hope they can tie it all together like the Dude's rug lol. There is a lot of back story that is vital to the main story, I just get a feeling that the majority of viewers who think Beverly Hills Chihuahua and White Chicks were blockbusters might find this movie too smart for them. Great book, you should read it if you haven't...it's like what toast said, it revolutionized the way comic books and graphic novels were made. (Reply to this) |
|
Jinjonator writes: on Oct 02 2008 03:56 PM What happened with whole thing between Fox and WB? I assume that's over? If so, WOO! March needs to hurry up and get here already. And yeah, I hope they keep it 2 hours and 40 minutes. (Reply to this) |
|
rockclmbr6 writes: on Oct 02 2008 04:23 PM CAN'T WAIT. Honestly, I'm just so glad that it's getting good early reactions. The book is so good...and it seems like Snyder really knows what he's doing on this. Will definitely see this in IMAX opening weekend. (Reply to this) |
|
Max Pendragon writes: on Oct 02 2008 04:37 PM In reply to this comment (#2058324) Agreed with Jokerboy, the book is astoundingly amazing. It will change the way you read comics. The artwork is actually very good for its time and easy on the eyes. Don't let the artwork turn you off, it actually grows on ya after a while. (Reply to this) |
|
smartmoviekid writes: on Oct 02 2008 04:46 PM the book simply changed the entire method of comic book writing after its publishing in '85. its an absolute masterpeice..and i cannot wait for the film...the descripions sound like Watchmen could hold "Dark Knight"-like magnitude in the comic to film genre. I really do hope so..as i loved the book, i loved Dark Knight..and i can't wait for this FREAKIN MOVIE!!!! (Reply to this) |
|
whitey_mcwhite writes: on Oct 02 2008 05:00 PM To the guy who thought that the art looked dated: the art was done that way for a reason. The idea is that, unlike other comics that visualize what you are supposed to feel before you hit the frame, Watchmen lets you figure out what to feel by actually reading the story. Even the movie, which won't include the Black Freighter or the between chapter tie ins, won't be complete next to the novel. If you won't read the novel, then you can't fully appreciate the movie, that's all there is to it. It's like being a fair weather fan to a sports team. And I guarrantee, when and if you do read it, you'll have to read it again. It's way too deep. Having said that, I can't wait for this movie. I loved 300 despite the fact that it was shallow, but let's face it, so was the novel. Let's wait to see what Snyder does with deeper material. I think this is what he's been building to. (Reply to this) |
|
mouse_clicker writes: on Oct 02 2008 05:01 PM In reply to this comment (#2058324) Firstly, the art seems dated because the whole thing is a subversion of the comic book genre. In other words, it's supposed to look that way. Secondly, the art is actually quite fantastic in a very subtle, reserved way. It's remarkably detailed in every single panel, and it is extremely cinematic in its use of layout, flow, and transitions. So just because it doesn't look like Jim Lee or Alex Ross, it's every bit their equal if not their superior. Also, don't worry about substance. 300 had none because it was a tough guy macho fun ride, much like everything from Frank Miller recently. Alan Moore, on the other hand, packs far more content in his comics than I ever thought possible. It's absolutely absurd how intricate and complex Watchmen is, with its multitude of themes, allusions, motifs, subplots, back stories, etc. I would suggest reading the book once through to get a feel for it, then reading it a second time with the Annotated Watchmen guide (Reply to this) |
|
HiFiRevival writes: on Oct 02 2008 05:31 PM In reply to this comment (#2058440) portentous = pretentious genera's = genre's If you are going to rip a comic for being the things you claimed it was, you should at least be able to spell the words you use to rip it. (Reply to this) |
|
whitey_mcwhite writes: on Oct 02 2008 05:38 PM In reply to this comment (#2058529) Now you're being pretentious. It's pretentious because Moore is pretentious, who you are shows in your work. Every artist is a tad pretentious, and what Moore was going for was the Moby Dick of comic book movies. So if you are trying to make the greatest of all comic book stories that reads deeper than your typical comic book story, then you can expect it to seem a tad pretentious. (Reply to this) |
| You must be registered to post comments. Login or Register. |











