RottenTomatoes.com
Log In | Register | What is RT?
Check out the new RT Community
  • Home
  • Movies
  • DVD
  • Celebrities
  • News
  • Critics
  • Trailers & Pictures
  • CommunityBeta
  • Features
  • | Columns
  • | Guides
RT Search Powered by Google
help icon Enhanced RT
searches on Google
Click here to turn on enhanced search results from RT on your Google searches.
 
News
Making Watchmen: What Took So Long?
RT looks at the graphic novel's oft-delayed trip to the big screen.
by Greg Dean Schmitz | February 13, 2009
Discuss Article
Page | 1 2 3 4

Last December, comics and movie fans eagerly awaiting the March 6th, 2009 release of Watchmen were shocked by the news that on Christmas Eve, Los Angeles federal judge Gary Allen Feess gave 20th Century Fox a big present. Feess ruled that Fox has rights to Watchmen, the spectacular looking and highly-anticipated movie that Warner Bros has been making, and is only a few months from releasing. Fox's lawsuit against Warner Bros hadn't been a secret, but few fans probably thought that anything would really come of it. After all, Watchmen was published by DC Comics, which is owned by Warner Bros, and so they clearly had the rights to make a movie based on the comic, right? Taken in that light, this is sort of like a studio suing over Warner Bros' rights to make a Batman or Superman movie. However, the history of the road of how Watchmen became a movie is much more complicated.

Let's begin at the beginning (the very beginning) with some comics corporate history. In 1934, Major Malcolm Wheeler-Nicholson founded a company called National Allied Publications to publish one of the first titles of a new thing called "comic books", in response to another company that had published the first example of a year earlier. Wheeler-Nicholson's first comic books were just reprints of strips from the Sunday funnies, but in 1937 he established a second, separate company to publish comic books comprised of original material that was mainly grittier, crime fighting stories. This new company's first title was to be Detective Comics, and so the initials, D.C., were used for the company's name. A year later in 1938, the company launched its fourth title, Action Comics #1 featuring a new type of character which would become known as "the superhero", in the form of Superman. The company was a huge success in the following years, which became known as the Golden Age of Comics. In 1944, D.C. Comics merged with National Allied (although Wheeler-Nicholson himself was out of both companies by then) and was called National Comics, although the DC Comics name was still used on most of the titles. Over the next 25 years, DC/National flourished, publishing comics in nearly all genres, including popular superheroes like Batman, Superman, Wonder Woman and the Flash. Meanwhile, over in the movie business, a company called 7 Arts had bought the troubled Warner Bros movie studio in 1967 for $85 million. Two years later, partly because of the popularity of the 1960s Batman TV series, National Comics was bought by Warner Bros/7 Arts. This history establishes something very important to the Watchmen legal story: DC Comics has belonged to Warner Bros for the last 40 years.

Now, let's speed along to the next page in this particular history book. Enter: Alan Moore. Born in England in 1953, comic book writer Alan Moore belonged to a group of writers and artists whose careers were incubated by England's own comic book industry. The flagship title in the English comics scene was the long-running anthology series 2000 A.D., which spun off a few long-running titles, including Judge Dredd (the awesome comic, not just the crappy movie). In the 1980s, mainstream comic books began to take on a new maturity, urged on by both a growing independent comics scene and the success of edgier, darker storylines like the "Dark Phoenix Saga" in Uncanny X-Men. The edgy British writers were perfect imports for companies like DC, and so in 1983, Alan Moore, who had achieved some acclaim with his V for Vendetta, was hired to write the monster comic, Swamp Thing, which he turned into a sort of gothic/noir romantic epic. Moore's success led to many of those other British writers, like Neil Gaiman (Sandman) and Grant Morrison (Doom Patrol) to also start writing for DC.

Next Page: Alan Moore's inspirations for Watchmen

Next Page >>
Bookmark and Share
Page | 1 2 3 4
Comments (1-20 of 38 posts) | Reply
jokerboy1991
jokerboy1991 writes:
on Feb 13 2009 08:08 AM

EPIC article! I just got my mid night show tickets! Also apparently Devin @ Chud saw it and really liked it.

(Reply to this)
Robert K.
Robert K. writes:
on Feb 13 2009 08:42 AM

Alan Moore could use a makeover.

(Reply to this)
Confounded
Confounded writes:
on Feb 13 2009 08:48 AM

In reply to this comment (#2317462)
Alan Moore is not what I would consider an average human being. A genius with a pen, no doubt. But he's an anarchist recluse who had a wife AND a mutual girlfriend household for years and worships an ancient Egyptian snake goddess. He has every right to be protective of his work, and I am not one to judge lifestyles, but I wouldn't expect to bump into him at a coffee shop wearing jeans and a t-shirt.

But hey, sometimes there's a fine line between crazy and genius, and sometimes there's no line at all.


(Reply to this)
greg_dean_schmitz
greg_dean_schmitz writes:
on Feb 13 2009 09:11 AM

In reply to this comment (#2317432)
Wow, thanks JokerBoy ! I put a lot into this article; been working on it for over a month.

(Reply to this)
spitting into the wind
spitting into the wind writes:
on Feb 13 2009 09:24 AM

Wow! That probably is the best article I have ever read on Rotten Tomatoes.
Truly informative.
I am quite worried about the news of Snyder changing the ending of Watchmen.
This could all end in tears. Many of them mine!


(Reply to this)
jokerboy1991
jokerboy1991 writes:
on Feb 13 2009 09:55 AM

In reply to this comment (#2317522)
I think the new ending, by the sound of it, still has the same message so I dont think the changes he made are a big deal.

(Reply to this)
jpbresnihan
jpbresnihan writes:
on Feb 13 2009 10:18 AM

i'm glad i am going into this movie knowing ahead of time that the ending is changed a bit. i feel if i walked in unexpectedly of the change then i would be floored. but now i can go in fairly thinking of what and why the change took place. three weeks!!

(Reply to this)
BjornFree
BjornFree writes:
on Feb 13 2009 10:26 AM

This was a well written and worthwhile read. Kudos.

(Reply to this)
The Bastard
The Bastard writes:
on Feb 13 2009 10:46 AM

(spoilers)

all of the reviews released state the giant squid monster is gone but there was also a lot of inside information from a while ago that said it was part of the movie. have these people been watching a fake ending? possibly and hopefully


(Reply to this)
rizzyh
rizzyh writes:
on Feb 13 2009 10:58 AM

I think that regardless of how the "threat" is dealt with, as long as the characters responses or reactions remain consistent with the graphic novel, it should be fine. The entire book was nothing if not an exploration of each type of super heroic character, and the ending was simply the conclusion of each of their respective storylines.
Personally, i like to think of Rorschach as kind of the Batman-like character, a detective with an unwavering sense of right and wrong but purely driven by wanting to fix a world that can't be helped. Whereas Dr Manhattan was more like a super powered god-like Silver Surfer, who for all the good he might want for the world, realizes that his destiny is beyond that of trying to save a self destructive people. Basically heroes, but a very nuanced vision of what that means to try to fix the real world.
Now, if they change those characterizations to try to make the characters appear more empathetic or mainstream heroic, or end with some kind of happy ending, then I'm gonna be PISSED!!! The beauty of Watchmen was how depressing it was, which is very important if you want to use comics to make people think and not just inspire as a modernized version of an Aesop fable.


(Reply to this)
The_Duckling
The_Duckling writes:
on Feb 13 2009 11:20 AM

I agree with rizzyh that if the ending has a different message, it won't be any good. But based on what ive heard coming out of test screenings and such, Zack is going to keep it good

(Reply to this)
kodie131
kodie131 writes:
on Feb 13 2009 11:24 AM

Greg this is a great article! Awesome stuff!

(Reply to this)
CJ H.
CJ H. writes:
on Feb 13 2009 12:04 PM

I agree incredible article! Watchman Cannot come out fast enough, especially with all the crap being released recently (saw push, wanted to through salt in my eyes all movie to end the pain) I am extremely worried about the changed ending though, I dont care if it has the same message, the ending is what brought all of Watchmen together and caped the masterpeice off perfectly.
I hope it works out.


(Reply to this)
Phil W.
Phil W. writes:
on Feb 13 2009 01:06 PM

Alan Moore may look crazy but he writes more interesting things than you ever will.

(Reply to this)
gm1200
gm1200 writes:
on Feb 13 2009 01:43 PM

Great article. I like how you gave DC their props without giving them undue credit as so many others have done when discussing this topic. 86 was a definitive year for DC, but many others claim it as a definitive year for comic books in general. The reality is it was just a big year for DC restructuring to get more in line with what other companies were already doing. DC started the superhero craze, and then let their vision of it stagnate for fourty years while other companies took their original vision in newer directions.

I think its fascinating how some (not all) of the fans are anticipating being angry about the script changes. Honestly, without rewrites, this story simply could not make a successful film. If the characters remain as depressing and unsympathetic as they were in the comics, who's going to care about them? Sure, many comic fans might, but they're a much different crowd than the average moviegoing bunch...and this film has to appeal to a broader base to make its money.

I'm actually hoping the director took a mediocre series of comics (call em like I see em) and improved on them...something I had zero hopes of when I first heard this was greenlit.


(Reply to this)
whitey_mcwhite
whitey_mcwhite writes:
on Feb 13 2009 03:41 PM

I read an interview with Zack Snyder where he stated that for years he was on the side of never wanting to see this movie get made. He actually took it on because he didn't want to see anyone else screw it up. They actually asked him to update it, and make it about terrorism and other crap and he refused, and said it has to stay the same. He did address the ending and only changed it because the ending in the book was nigh unfilmable and opted for an ending that kept the spirit of the book and the characters making it a little more easier to handle for mainstream audiences in it's "believability" but still kept much of the ending. I trust him!

This was an amazing article. I would like to know more of who all worked on this project. I know Terry Gilliam at one point was attached, back when Alan Moore wasn't completely anti-Hollywood, and actually met with Moore on many occasions. After talking with Moore though, even he deemed it unfilmable and left the project.


(Reply to this)
ledawg1138
ledawg1138 writes:
on Feb 13 2009 05:55 PM

I just finished "Watchmen" a week a go for the first time! I LOVE IT! I'd put it along side "The Dark Knight Returns" for my favorite graphic novel. I'd say Rorschach is tied for my favorite comic book charater. (With The Joker.)


Alan Moore is...a character. To put it nicely. He's a brilliant writer, but, you know, Glycon and him.


(Reply to this)
ledawg1138
ledawg1138 writes:
on Feb 13 2009 05:58 PM

By the way, great artcle Greg! We sound like a broken record.

(Reply to this)
jokerboy1991
jokerboy1991 writes:
on Feb 13 2009 06:09 PM

In reply to this comment (#2317601)
(SPOILERS)


The squid was always never in any of the scripts, so I dont get why it was such a big shock to everyone. It has been known for a long time. Every character who lived in the graphic novel lives in the movie, every character that died dies in the movie. Also Veidt still gets away with it, though I am pretty sure they are keeping the ending with Rorscach's journal.


(Reply to this)
Detrs
Detrs writes:
on Feb 13 2009 07:13 PM

Greg, thank you for this article. I remember when you used to do Upcoming Movies (I think it was). Then you were picked up by yahoo, and now you're here.

That's been a journey in and of itself. Thanks for all the time and effort you've put into everything over the year, this article especially.


(Reply to this)
Read More Comments
Page | 1 2
Post Your Comment
You must be registered to post comments. Login or Register.

Related Links

Watchmen
  • Pictures
  • Posters
  • News
  • Forum

Related Articles

  • RT on DVD: We're Watching The Watchmen (3)
  • Paging Dr. Manhattan: The Future of Digital Characters (13)
  • Five Favorite Films With Dave Gibbons (48)
  • Dave Gibbons Talks Watchmen (47)
  • RT on DVD: Watchmen Director's Cut, Coraline, Animated GI Joe (55)
  • Watchmen Director's Cut Headed to Theaters Opens in new window (32)
  • Warners Partners with Facebook for Watchmen Blu-ray Opens in new window (15)
  • Alex Tse Shapes Up for Battling Boy Opens in new window (0)
  • Snyder Says Watchmen Director's Cut Is Still Headed to Theaters Opens in new window (6)
  • Win Home Cinema Systems with Tales of the Black Freighter (0)

Most Discussed

  • Box Office Guru Wrapup: New Moon Shatters Records (163)
  • Critics Consensus: New Moon Wanes (129)
  • Tomatometer Watch: Will Twilight's New Moon Dazzle? (97)
  • Total Recall: Star-Crossed Lovers (75)
  • Weekly Ketchup: Idris Elba cast in Thor, more Spider-Man 4 rumors (53)
  • Five Favorite Films with Werner Herzog (50)
  • Total Recall: John Travolta's Best Movies (42)
  • Friday Harvest: New Moon, Avatar, and more! (32)
  • RT on DVD & Blu-Ray: Angels & Demons, Funny People, and Superman (14)
  • "I Don't Hate Women": Lars von Trier on Antichrist (6)

Latest News

  • "I Don't Hate Women": Lars von Trier on Antichrist (6)
  • Total Recall: John Travolta's Best Movies (42)
  • RT on DVD & Blu-Ray: Angels & Demons, Funny People, and Superman (14)
  • Box Office Guru Wrapup: New Moon Shatters Records (163)
  • Weekly Ketchup: Idris Elba cast in Thor, more Spider-Man 4 rumors (53)
  • Ho, ho, ho! It's RT's Great Big Gift Guide! (0)
  • Friday Harvest: New Moon, Avatar, and more! (32)
  • Critics Consensus: New Moon Wanes (129)
  • Total Recall: Star-Crossed Lovers (75)
  • Tomatometer Watch: Will Twilight's New Moon Dazzle? (97)

Latest Interviews

  • "I Don't Hate Women": Lars von Trier on Antichrist (6)
  • Eric Bana talks Love the Beast - RT Interview (8)
  • Fight Club Sound Designer Reflects on Film's 10th Anniversary (19)
  • James Schamus talks Taking Woodstock - RT Interview (6)
  • John Hurt Talks Harry Potter, Quentin Crisp and Alien - The RT Interview (15)
  • Terry Gilliam Talks Doctor Parnassus (18)
  • Wes Anderson Talks Fantastic Mr. Fox - RT Interview (8)
  • Wolverine Creator Len Wein Talks About the Film (28)
  • Gavin Hood Talks Wolverine; Possible Sequel (28)
  • Duncan Jones talks Moon, Sam Rockwell, and Mute (14)

Latest Features

  • "I Don't Hate Women": Lars von Trier on Antichrist (6)
  • Fight Club Sound Designer Reflects on Film's 10th Anniversary (19)
  • Five Favourite Films with Ang Lee (34)
  • 10 Movies That Changed The (End Of The) World (32)
  • Ho-ho-horror! 10 Scary Christmas Movies (39)
  • 12 Facts About 2012 (135)
  • Terry Gilliam Talks Doctor Parnassus (18)
  • Five Favourite Films with 24's Carlos Bernard (33)
  • Six Horrible Part Sixes (32)
  • Christopher Smith's Favourite Cult Horror Films (14)

Sponsored Links

 
 
About| Site Map| Help| RT To Go| Contact Us| Critics Submission| Linking to RT| Licensing| Movie List| Games| Celebs List| Newsletter
IGN Logo

IGN.com | GameSpy | Comrade | Arena | FilePlanet | GameSpy Technology
TeamXbox | Planets | Vaults | VE3D | CheatsCodesGuides | GameStats | GamerMetrics
AskMen.com | Rotten Tomatoes | Direct2Drive | Green Pixels


By continuing past this page, and by the continued use of this site, you agree to be bound by and abide by the User Agreement.
Copyright 1998-2009, IGN Entertainment, Inc. About IGN | Support | Advertise | Privacy Policy | User Agreement | Subscribe to RT's XML feed! IGN RSS Feeds
IGN's enterprise databases running Oracle, SQL and MySQL are professionally monitored and managed by Pythian Remote DBA
Certain product data ©1995-present Muze, Inc. For personal use only. All rights reserved.