Opening

—— As Above/So Below Aug 29
38% The November Man Aug 27
98% Starred Up Aug 27
81% The Congress Aug 29
62% Life Of Crime Aug 29

Top Box Office

92% Guardians of the Galaxy $17.2M
20% Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles $16.7M
39% If I Stay $15.7M
20% Let's Be Cops $10.8M
18% When The Game Stands Tall $8.4M
34% The Expendables 3 $6.5M
32% The Giver $6.4M
45% Sin City: A Dame to Kill For $6.3M
65% The Hundred-Foot Journey $5.3M
20% Into The Storm $3.8M

Coming Soon

—— Innocence Sep 05
—— The Identical Sep 05
—— The Longest Week Sep 05
67% The House of Magic Sep 05
73% God Help the Girl Sep 05

New Episodes Tonight

86% The Bridge (FX): Season 2
91% The Divide: Season 1
83% Extant: Season 1
—— Franklin & Bash: Season 4
—— Graceland: Season 2
—— Hot in Cleveland: Season 5
57% Legends: Season 1
—— Motive: Season 2
69% Mystery Girls: Season 1
38% Taxi Brooklyn: Season 1
43% Young & Hungry: Season 1

Discuss Last Night's Shows

—— Covert Affairs: Season 5
88% Finding Carter: Season 1
67% Matador: Season 1
—— Pretty Little Liars: Season 5
—— Rizzoli & Isles: Season 5
—— Royal Pains: Season 5
—— Sullivan & Son: Season 3
60% Tyrant: Season 1

Certified Fresh TV

86% The Bridge (FX): Season 2
83% Extant: Season 1
89% The Honorable Woman: Season 1
87% The Knick: Season 1
89% Manhattan: Season 1
97% Masters of Sex: Season 2
73% Murder in the First: Season 1
89% Outlander: Season 1
82% Satisfaction: Season 1
87% The Strain: Season 1
82% Welcome to Sweden: Season 1
77% You're the Worst: Season 1

We Are What We Are (2013)

tomatometer

85

Average Rating: 7/10
Reviews Counted: 81
Fresh: 69 | Rotten: 12

A compelling story cleverly told, We Are What We Are quenches horror buffs' thirst for gore while serving up serious-minded filmmaking and solid acting.

86

Average Rating: 7.1/10
Critic Reviews: 21
Fresh: 18 | Rotten: 3

A compelling story cleverly told, We Are What We Are quenches horror buffs' thirst for gore while serving up serious-minded filmmaking and solid acting.

audience

49

liked it
Average Rating: 3.1/5
User Ratings: 8,644

My Rating

Movie Info

The Parkers have always kept to themselves, and for good reason. Behind closed doors, patriarch Frank rules his family with a rigorous fervor, determined to keep his ancestral customs intact at any cost. As a torrential rainstorm moves into the area, tragedy strikes and his daughters Iris and Rose are forced to assume responsibilities that extend beyond those of a typical family. As the unrelenting downpour continues to flood their small town, the local authorities begin to uncover clues that

R,

Drama, Horror, Mystery & Suspense

Nick Damici, Jim Mickle

Jan 7, 2014

$76.6k

Entertainment One - Official Site External Icon

Watch It Now

Cast

Latest News on We Are What We Are

September 27, 2013:
Critics Consensus: Rush and Don Jon Certified Fresh
This week at the movies, we've got racing rivals (Rush, starring Chris Hemsworth and Daniel Brühl);...

ADVERTISEMENT

Friend Ratings

No Friends? Inconceivable! Log in to see what your friends have to say.

All Critics (81) | Top Critics (21) | Fresh (69) | Rotten (12)

A family implodes with a biting commentary on patriarchy.

December 16, 2013 Full Review Source: Chicago Sun-Times
Chicago Sun-Times
Top Critic IconTop Critic

"We Are What We Are" is such a patient, trusting film it may take you a while to figure out it's a horror film.

October 17, 2013 Full Review Source: Arizona Republic
Arizona Republic
Top Critic IconTop Critic

We Are What We Are doesn't waste time with cheap scares. Mickle keeps his story on a steady, slow simmer, transporting us minute by minute into the very heart of dread.

October 11, 2013 Full Review Source: Philadelphia Inquirer
Philadelphia Inquirer
Top Critic IconTop Critic

There's some fun to be had, as long as your idea of fun includes being grossed out.

October 10, 2013 Full Review Source: Washington Post
Washington Post
Top Critic IconTop Critic

The movie stays elegantly restrained just long enough for the true horror of what they're doing to sink in.

October 10, 2013 Full Review Source: Seattle Times
Seattle Times
Top Critic IconTop Critic

A campy and sometimes elegant American Gothic horror story.

October 10, 2013 Full Review Source: Boston Globe
Boston Globe
Top Critic IconTop Critic

Another welcome entry in the ongoing revival of horror movies that rely on character and setting rather than shock and gore to chill audiences to the marrow.

June 28, 2014 Full Review Source: Windy City Times
Windy City Times

And sometimes we are who we eat.

April 22, 2014 Full Review Source: Newcity
Newcity

Remakes may get a lot of stick in Hollywood, as filmmakers can be accused of being somewhat lazy and uncreative in that regard.

March 10, 2014 Full Review Source: HeyUGuys
HeyUGuys

An ambitious (if somewhat uneven) slice of downbeat American gothic which interweaves grim melancholia with pointed satire, doomy portent and moments of gnawing revulsion.

March 2, 2014 Full Review Source: Observer [UK]
Observer [UK]

Some of the film is gruesome in the extreme but there is always lyricism and pathos alongside the bloodletting.

February 28, 2014 Full Review Source: Independent
Independent

Mickle and co-writer Nick Damici give themselves plenty of time to tease out their themes and ladle on the tension.

February 28, 2014 Full Review Source: Sight and Sound
Sight and Sound

Jim Mickle's savvy re-imagining of the 2010 Mexican art-house horror marks a quantum leap forward in maturity and style for the Stake Land director.

February 28, 2014 Full Review Source: Radio Times
Radio Times

Who can resist a good cannibal movie?

February 28, 2014 Full Review Source: This is London
This is London

Another pointless remake.

February 27, 2014 Full Review Source: Guardian
Guardian

A rare example of a remake that is as good as, if not better, than the original.

February 27, 2014 Full Review Source: The List
The List

Stupendously dull: dull with that blend of overloaded effect and under-supplied affect that bad horror alone truly offers.

February 27, 2014 Full Review Source: Financial Times
Financial Times

Even though this is an extremely well-made film, it's difficult to know who will enjoy it, as it's far too arty for horror genre fans and much too grisly for arthouse moviegoers.

February 27, 2014 Full Review Source: Contactmusic.com
Contactmusic.com

This social-realist take on the cannibal sub-genre makes for a surprising lyrical and quietly profound piece of filmmaking.

February 27, 2014 Full Review Source: Little White Lies
Little White Lies

A shrug of a movie.

February 27, 2014 Full Review Source: Sky Movies
Sky Movies

Mickle prizes credible characterisation above everything else, and casts extremely good actors, who succeed in making the Parker clan feel both frail and somehow stuck out of time, like freak survivors from the 19th century.

February 27, 2014 Full Review Source: Daily Telegraph
Daily Telegraph

An atmospheric cannibalism horror featuring an impressive performance by Julia Garner, but it's let down by a slow first act, weak dialogue and an unsuitable score.

February 26, 2014 Full Review Source: ViewLondon
ViewLondon

Mickle has fashioned a melancholy American Gothic tale set deep among bleak, misty mountains.

February 25, 2014 Full Review Source: Electric Sheep
Electric Sheep

A superb grief-soaked horror set in a desperated, godless universe, WAWWA is unnverving and moving in equal measures, easily eclipsing the original.

February 24, 2014 Full Review Source: Total Film
Total Film

A crunching, visceral transplant for this cannibal tale from its urban Mexican setting to an American milieu.

February 24, 2014 Full Review Source: Empire Magazine
Empire Magazine

Genre fans wanting more gore and less fancy atmospherics will have their gratification delayed but certainly not denied.

February 5, 2014 Full Review Source: SF Weekly
SF Weekly

Audience Reviews for We Are What We Are

Actually pretty creepy horror movie with a theme I didn't immediately guess.
Well filmed, nicely acted and fittingly horrible story.
June 14, 2014
romy861

Super Reviewer

An efficient psychological horror film that works precisely because it avoids cheap scares, adopting an oppressive cinematography to create a slow-burning, disturbing experience centered on religion, tradition and patriarchy, despite being a bit predictable in some moments.
December 18, 2013
blacksheepboy

Super Reviewer

three stars...
October 27, 2013
YodaMasterJedi
MisterYoda ?

Super Reviewer

We are what we are: stardust, close to divine! ...Why, yes, people, I did just reference a song from the '90s sooner than Joni Mitchell's/Crosby, Stills, Nash & Young's "Woodstock", which, of course, features the line "We are stardust", and the reason why is easy: because The Flower Kings' "Stardust We Are" is awesome. Those who would say that I just forced in yet another testament of my love to progressive rock don't know that The Flower Kings are from Sweden, the home of music that is about as disturbing as this film, and those who actually know The Flower Kings would still find the reference forced, as The Flower Kings is a little too upbeat for subject matter of this type. Yeah, this is more like "We Are What We Eat", because it's about cannibals and all that delightful stuff, evidently on Orson Welles, because Bill Sage really is looking like he consumed and took on the facial form of Welles. Shoot, this story might actually be inspired by Orson Welles, as the man got so fat that he had to have had a human or too along the way, although it's not like Sage is close to Orson Welles fat in this film. Sage should have really porked out for this film in order to celebrate Mexico's recently being named the fattest country in the world, as this is based on a Mexican film, which should tell you that this film is not about Orson Welles, seeing as how Welles left his startlingly over-stressed heart in Spain, where the diet isn't as over-the-top as it is in Mexico. Yeah, I'm glad to see that they Americanized this story, because it's hard to believe that they would make all that big of a deal about cannibalism in Mexico, although I would be more glad if the potential in this story wasn't betrayed by certain aspects.

There are only so many gory moments in this mostly psychological thriller, but when the nastiness kicks in, the film gets to be really audacious in its attention to disturbing imagery that is often pretty effective in reinforcing tension, yet just as often feels gratuitous in its being so graphic, to the point of being kind of distancing, even if your investment in the characters who meet such inhuman fates is loosened by expository shortcomings. This is more of an abstract character meditations than a character study, selling its characters just fine through thoughtful storytelling and solid acting, and standing to be rather ambiguous to begin with, yet still offering much too little in the way of immediate background development, as well as only so much in the way of expository focus to progression that ironically spends plenty of time bloating itself. Nick Damici's and Jim Mickle's script meanders along pretty repetitiously limp material, if not excess filler that isn't so much comprised of aimless set pieces, as much as it's comprised of lyrical nothingness. I've already described this thriller as mostly atmospheric and abstract, so I suppose it's safe to say that this is something of an art thriller, with enough traditional structuring to feel reasonably focused, but more than a few offbeat meditative moments that feel too borderline abstract for you to get a sense of momentum, further retarded by directorial storytelling that is just as deliberately limp. Mickle's very somber and atmospheric approach to such a sparsely structured narrative gets to be penetratingly effective when chilling score work and visuals come into play, but when things are simply quiet and more-or-less unstructured, thoughtful direction is merely bland, if not out-and-out dull. Really, when it's all said and done, the biggest problem with this film is that it is artistically overblown, meeting questionable ambitions with enough inspiration to really compel in certain places, but ultimately falling pretty decidedly into underwhelmingness, with enough meandering structuring and blanding direction to have the occasional glimpse at mediocrity. Of course, mediocrity is very much evaded in the long run, and no matter how much the final product leaves you with much to be desired, in addition to some challenges to your attention span, it has some value, especially that of the stylistic persuasion.

If nothing else stands out, it's the aesthetic value of this film, which is nothing unique, sure, yet is thoroughly inspired in a hauntingly subtle way, with Ryan Samul's cinematography being richly bleak, near-surrealistically shadow-heavy, and all-around ruggedly gritty, while Jeff Grace's, Darren Morris' and Phil Mossman's light modern classical score strikes with a solid style that ranges from dreamy piano work to biting string work. Neo-gothic visual and musical styles encompass the aesthetic depths of this bleak art drama beautifully, with an effectiveness that goes augmented by inspired directorial plays on the style. Again, when material runs thin and thoughtful storytelling finds itself dully meditating upon nothingness, the film is distancing in its, well, dullness, and yet, when material kicks in, the thoughtfulness to Jim Mickle's direction goes a long, long way in digging under your skin and drawing anything from dramatic resonance to a claustrophobic sense of anxiety, sometimes flavored up by the often gratuitous attention to graphic imagery that grows more and more disturbing as the film progresses (Man, the final act is so messed up on so many levels). The film could have fallen flat as a mediocre misfire of abstract artistry, but overstylization rarely gets too carried away, and is often compensated for by many a highlight in direction which does some justice to the potential of this subject matter. Maybe this story is kind of thin, and storytelling missteps emphasize this to the point of securing the final product as underwhelming, but those many highlights in style and direction unveil intriguing depths to drama and tension through the overblown artistic value, anchored by themes dealing with the brutality of humans, and how it is disguised by, maybe even ties into family and religious affairs. The film is essentially a grimier version of, say, "Stoker", and while it is too grimy and, for that matter, artistically misguided to be nearly as rewarding as the other 2013 psychological thriller in question, those who appreciated something like "Stoker" are sure to appreciate this film to some extent, especially considering that if this film matches "Stoker" in no other department, it is the very department that made "Stoker" shine: the acting one, for what truly drives this film is a lead cast that chills to the bone about as much as anything, with little Jack Gore capturing the confusion of the youngest child in a disturbed household, and Julia Garner being convincing as a flawed young lady who is more curious about her family's disturbing lifestyle than anything, while leading lady Ambyr Childers nails the distraught atmosphere of a quiet girl who struggles to hang on to an ever-thinning shred of humanity, and Bill Sage simply steals the show with an intensely subdued and often dramatically charged portrayal of a loving, but mentally and physically ill patriarch who carries his loved ones into dark secrets in the midst of grief over the loss of his wife. While Childers and Sage stick with you the most, the film could be considered a solid vehicle for striking atmospheric acting that this drama just wouldn't be the same without, and while the final product fails to be solid in enough other departments be nearly as worthwhile as the performances which carry it, there is enough skill to the style and highlights, both on and off of the screen, to make the final product endearing, through all of its questionable elements.

Once the feast is finished, some gratuitous gore, expository shortcomings, overly draggy structuring and often dullingly over-atmospheric direction leave the final product to collapse just short of rewarding, yet where this film could have fallen further, say, into mediocrity, under the weight of its artistic questionability, hauntingly beautiful cinematography and score work, biting highlights to the telling of an intriguing story, and solid performances - especially by leading lady Ambyr Childers and the show-stealing Bill Sage - ultimately prove to be enough to make Jim Mickle's "We Are What We Are" an aesthetically and sometimes narratively gripping art thriller, in spite of some artistic bloatings.

2.75/5 - Decent
February 12, 2014
Cameron W. Johnson
Cameron Johnson

Super Reviewer

There are no approved quotes yet for this movie.

Discussion Forum

Discuss We Are What We Are on our Movie forum!

What's Hot On RT

Emmy Winners
Emmy Winners

Full winners list

Emmys Red Carpet
Emmys Red Carpet

Pictures from the big ceremony

More Emmy Pictures
More Emmy Pictures

Inside the winners' press room

National Dog Day
National Dog Day

101 photos of movie and television dogs

Summer Scorecard
Summer Scorecard

Find out how critics rank the movies!

Find us on:                     
Help | About | Jobs | Critics Submission | Press | API | Licensing | Mobile