Average Rating: 5.3/10
Reviews Counted: 76
Fresh: 35 | Rotten: 41
The acting in Where the Money Is is excellent. However, the movie feels like a made-for-TV movie that's plain and forgettable.
Average Rating: 5.6/10
Critic Reviews: 19
Fresh: 10 | Rotten: 9
The acting in Where the Money Is is excellent. However, the movie feels like a made-for-TV movie that's plain and forgettable.
liked it
Average Rating: 2.9/5
User Ratings: 1,894
An ailing criminal and his excitement-starved nurse decide to knock over a bank for fun and profit in this comic suspense story. Legendary bank robber Henry Manning (Paul Newman) pushes his luck too far and ends up in prison, where he suffers a massive stroke. He is transferred to a nursing home, in the care of Carol Ann McKay (Linda Fiorentino), a high school prom queen who married her boyfriend Wayne (Dermot Mulroney), the star of her school's football team, and whose glamour days are well
PG-13, 1 hr. 28 min.
Apr 14, 2000 Wide
Dec 19, 2000
USA Home Entertainment
All Critics (94) | Top Critics (26) | Fresh (35) | Rotten (41) | DVD (7)
Age has pared Paul Newman's fine features to a sketch; it's also honed his huge movie appeal to such basics that he can pretty much maintain our attention while in a coma.
Catch it on cable sometime, and enjoy.
Sadly, the subtext and context of Money is that everyone's better days are a distant memory.
Paul Newman's charismatic performance elevates this hodgepodge of a picture, but it is not enough.
Decent movie that pushes the PG-13 envelope.
The money of the film's title should refer to Paul Newman, because the actor's presence elevates this routine caper into a pleasantly bankable diversion.
Newman and Fiorentino steal cash -- and scenes -- in amiable heist comedy.
A sly, smooth, extremely enjoyable caper... full of scenes you want to get lost in.
For all the film's jauntiness (actually, because of it), it merely depresses.
:rotten: The only thing I can think of after watching such a bad film is, " Why did Paul Newman accept to act in this crap?" Everything (except Paul Newman) looks amateurish, the main problems I found in the movie are a bad story that never should have been filmed, an awful screenplay full of clitches, a pretty low
December 7, 2008
You would think this film was made for TV. I don't know maybe it is, but the film is very amateurish looking and squanders it's cast.
September 27, 2008
| 35% | The Hangover Part II |
| 25% | Twilight Saga: Breaking Dawn Par... |
| 81% | Kung Fu Panda 2 |
| 44% | Cowboys & Aliens |
| 83% | Rise of the Planet of the Apes |
| 25% | Twilight Saga: Breaking Dawn Par... |
| 88% | Lady and the Tramp |
| 69% | A Very Harold & Kumar Christmas |
| 21% | Fireflies in the Garden |
| 45% | The Rebound |
Journey 2 Not Worth the Trip
What are his 10 best movies ever?
See the all-new action-packed trailer!
Five new Marvelous pictures