News » Exclusive: The World of Where the Wild Things Are

Exclusive: The World of Where the Wild Things Are

Spike Jonze, Maurice Sendak and more take RT on a journey through the film.

It has taken Being John Malkovich and Adaptation director Spike Jonze more than five years to bring Where the Wild Things Are to the big screen. Maurice Sendak, the writer and illustrator of the best-selling children's book (which has sold upward of 20 million copies), identified Jonze as the only man he trusted enough to render his story on film. That story focuses on Max, the boisterous boy in wolf pyjamas who, when sent to his room for bad behaviour, journeys in his imagination and travels to the realm of the Wild Things, a gaggle of hairy monsters who proclaim him king. The book contains only a few hundred words, and yet Jonze has created a full feature film, as wild as the source and as dark and brooding as any ancient fairy tale. The director joins Maurice Sendak and some of his key collaborators to explain exclusively to RT how they shaped the world of Where the Wild Things Are on the big screen.

Maurice Sendak, author and illustrator:
Maurice SendakWhen I started working on the book back in 1960, I didn't really know why I'd written it. I think the inspiration came from a lot of our family's relatives who used to come from the old country to visit, and they were really unkempt, they didn't speak English, their teeth were horrifying, their hair all crazy and they'd pick you up and hug you and kiss you and would say 'Arrghhh, we could eat you up.' And my brother and sister and I knew that these people really would eat anything, so I decided to render them as Wild Things.

Where the Wild Things Are

Spike Jonze, writer/director:
Spike JonzeI had gotten to know Maurice about 15 years ago. We worked on a movie that didn't happen and through that became friends. One day he talked to me about doing Where The Wild Things Are. I was excited by it but also really nervous about it because the book is so short but I didn't want to add some storyline or some plot. I'd look at it and say, 'How could you add to this?' And anything I felt like adding would just sound cheesy. But over the years, as I started thinking more about the book, I suddenly thought that the Wild Things could be wild emotions. Suddenly out of that everything tumbled and it felt like I could build from inside the book.

Dave Eggers, co-writer:
Dave EggersSpike wanted to make sure that what he remembered feeling through his childhood corresponded with what kids think today. He interviewed lots of kids of Max's age, and it really confirmed that they all deal with very deep emotions. So with the screenplay, the Wild Things embody those emotions. The film really is about childhood. It's about what it's like to be eight or nine years old and trying to figure out the world, the people around you, and emotions that are sometimes unpredictable or confusing.

Where the Wild Things Are

Spike Jonze:
We never set any rules about whether it would be a movie for kids or for adults. Maurice Sendak didn't consider himself a children's author; he wrote about what it felt like to be a kid. So it was really important that we got the main character right. For Max I wanted a real kid, not necessarily an actor that was going to give a typical 'movie-kid' performance. I wanted someone who was going to give a real, emotional performance, and after a very long search I found Max Records. He really is the heart of the movie, and he has such depth to him as a person. It doesn't feel as though he's acting at all. It's such a natural performance.

Bed Head

Bed Head on 12-7-2009 06:07 AM

I'm so saddened that this movie didn't do "better" (financially speaking, in terms of public perception, etc). And not only because it was unfairly maligned in its own right. (A la "Babe: Pig in the City".)

Perhaps MORE IMPORTANTLY due to the negative impact WTWTA's "failure" will have on (the potential for) film versions of "In the Night Kitchen", "Outside Over There" and (most especially) "Higglety Pigglety Pop! or There Must Be More To Life" (Sendak's greatest work, imo).

Confounded

Confounded on 12-7-2009 07:46 AM

It was such a great movie for me. I have a handful of movies that nostalgically make me remember my childhood; ones from my youth that trigger any range of memories. But this was the first movie I've seen than brought me back to my childhood.

In a way, it was kind of like Watchmen. It was so unapologetically created, and that makes people balk. They simply said, "This is the movie I wanted made; the one I felt needed to be made. If you don't like it, F' you." Which isn't exactly the key to commercial success.

But this will still be a member of my movie collection the day it comes out.

General Disarray

General Disarray on 12-7-2009 11:12 AM

eh, don't get me wrong, the movie definetly had promise, but I just didn't agree w/ the execution. Watching this movie is like having a conversation w/ a little kid, its fascinating to watch them as their imagination goes in a hundred different directions but after about 2 minutes it becomes unbearable.

I did like the way Jonze blended physical objects and CG to create the monsters though, if anything, I think that is the future of hollywood special effects and not ridiculous looking movies like avatar, or as I like to call it, James Cameron's King Kong.

misterkyle1901

misterkyle1901 on 12-7-2009 12:06 PM

This was a great movie, and I too wished more people saw it. A lot of parents assumed that it would be too scary for their children judging by the rumors and the critical opinion. But it is perhaps the parents who needed to see it most.

David Dangelico

David Dangelico on 12-7-2009 12:36 PM

I thought the movie was beautiful/incredible. It really moved me to my core. I can, however, understand why some people may not like it. Its just a matter of opinion. The film is a classic in my book though

Alexson Philip

Alexson Philip on 12-7-2009 01:14 PM

so far the film has earned about 95 million world wide, which is bad, as the budget for the film was 100 mill. so another box office flop, but astro boy was even worse, as it got terrible reviews and only 30 mill worldwide. with a 100 mill budget.

General Disarray

General Disarray on 12-7-2009 01:36 PM

You do realize how incosequential a film's theatrical run is, don't you? Movies make more money of network syndication and dvd sales. Besides, the budget usually doesn't include the millions of dollars they spend of promotion anyways. Movies are long term investments, it usually takes them over a year to start making a profit.

paganif1

paganif1 on 12-7-2009 07:30 PM

I loved this movie and really only had one major complaint; listening to other people bad mouth it. I am not a big enough film snob to flat out put down (most) movies. I see the reverse of that happen with casual movie-goers though. Their main complaints, 1) thin on story, 2) not "kiddy" enough.

1) The source material is maybe a five minute read. Trying to make a new narrative on top of it would have felt forced. Spike new this and it is why it took 5 years to get a final screenplay.
2) I do not care at all when people don't like movies I do. I do get annoyed when they say movies are bad because they were not what was expected. A movie should not be faulted for your false expectations!
I love the fact that Spike made this for himself. It saddens to me see it's "failure" because the Transformers and Tweenlights of the world are more commercially viable. Oh well

frogboy

frogboy on 12-7-2009 10:42 PM

I like the source material, the fantastic work by the skilled artists and all of the performances. I found the rest to be self-indulgent. There wasn't enough movie there to satisfy the healthy budget. This could have been a film aired and celebrated every year and kept true to the source material. This film does neither. I'm fortunate to have viewed it once. It's unlikely I'll feel the need to revisit it. I usually like this sort of film. This is an example why good ideas outside of the mainstream can%u2019t get the appropriate funds in order to proceed. Ultimately film is about storytelling. This tale had less substance than the book.

summer l.

summer l. on 12-13-2009 10:51 PM

Over the years, --" classymingle.CxxxxOxxxxM " --has experienced tremendous success in bringing wealthy singles and hot sexy single babies together. It's the largest club where seeking hot babies . No exaggeration, no falseness, check it out , you will believe what you see. You'll never know who you will meet.totally free to join.C'MON now.

What's Hot On RT

Critics Consensus
Critics Consensus

Journey 2 Not Worth the Trip

Luis Guzman
Luis Guzman

What are his 10 best movies ever?

<em>Amazing Spider-Man</em>
Amazing Spider-Man

See the all-new action-packed trailer!

The Avengers!
The Avengers!

Five new Marvelous pictures

Help | About | Jobs | Newsletter | Critics Submission | API | Licensing | Blog | Developers | Mobile