ROTTEN TOMATOES: Box Office Guru Wrapup: Wolverine Has Huge $87M Opening

Box Office Guru Wrapup: Wolverine Has Huge $87M Opening

The X-Men spin-off opens blockbuster season with a bang.

by Gitesh Pandya | May 03, 2009

Fox's super hero spinoff X-Men Origins: Wolverine crushed the competition and ruled the global box office kicking off the summer movie season with a scorching debut. The romantic comedy Ghosts of Girlfriends Past opened reasonably well in second place helping the overall marketplace match the same weekend a year ago when Iron Man got 2008's record summer season started.

Wolverine generated a ferocious opening weekend grossing an estimated $87M over the Friday-to-Sunday period from a studio record 4,099 theaters for a sizzling $21,225 average. Starring Hugh Jackman who also produced, the PG-13 prequel tells the origin story of the popular X-Men character and successfully launched a new series of spinoffs for a decade-old franchise that previously grossed $606.6M domestically across its last three installments.

The opening ranked as the eleventh best for May, the strongest month of the year when it comes to debuts. However it was the fourth largest when looking at the first weekend of May when the summer movie season traditionally kicks off. Only fellow comic book pics Spider-Man 3 ($151.1M in 2007), Spider-Man ($114.8M in 2002), and Iron Man ($98.6M) have fared better. The Wolverine bow is also the third largest in studio history for Fox trailing Star Wars Episode III ($108.4M) and X-Men: The Last Stand ($102.8M).

Directed by Gavin Hood (Tsotsi), Wolverine got off to a muscular start with $35M in ticket sales on Friday. Saturday dropped by 15% to $29.8M while Sunday is estimated to fall by 25% to $22.3M. During their opening weekends, Saturday-to-Sunday declines were 30% for Iron Man and 22% for Spider-Man 3. The audience for the new tale was 53% male and 52% over 25.

A pirated copy of Wolverine surfaced online a month ago and may have had an impact on sales this weekend. Although there has been much speculation, no hard data exists pinpointing how much in ticket sales was lost. The source of the leaked early copy has not been found.

Looking at past summer kickoff films, the Origins opening weekend gross most resembled the $85.6M of X2: X-Men United from 2003, although ticket prices have risen by 21% since that year. By comparing admissions, Wolverine sold about as many tickets as 2001's The Mummy Returns which debuted to $68.1M which translates to roughly $88M at today's ticket prices. Both sold about 12 million stubs in their first three days.

Still, for an X-Men movie stripped of popular characters like Storm, Magneto, Professor X, and Rogue, Wolverine managed to stand on its own two feet and pull in numbers in line with franchise history. But without so many expensive actors demanding raises with each new installment, the cost was lower this time - $130M after tax credits from shooting in Australia are factored in. The first three mutant films were all shot in Canada with the initial installment opening to $54.5M in July of 2000. Last Stand carried a hefty reported price tag of $210M.

Fox and Marvel are developing an origin film for Magneto which is planned for a 2011 release. That same year, the comic book giant also aims to release the big screen adventures Captain America and Thor through Paramount and Spider-Man 4 through Sony.

Wolverine had sharp claws overseas too with a spectacular day and date launch that pulled in an additional $73M from over 9,000 screens in 101 markets making for a colossal $160M opening around the world. Next weekend, grosses are expected to drop sharply as Paramount invades theaters globally with its highly-anticipated sci-fi origin tale Star Trek.

For those not interested in super hero battles, Warner Bros. offered the Matthew McConaughey-Jennifer Garner wedding-themed comedy Ghosts of Girlfriends Past which debuted in second place with an estimated $15.3M from 3,175 locations for a decent $4,827 average. It was a respectable debut for a romantic comedy and slightly exceeded the chick flick offering Made of Honor which countered Iron Man this weekend last year with a $14.8M bow. However, Ghosts failed to come close to the $20M mark which most McConaughey romance vehicles tend to break.

His 2003 hit How to Lose a Guy in 10 Days with Kate Hudson opened to $23.8M, the 2006 pic Failure to Launch with Sarah Jessica Parker bowed to $24.4M, and last year's action-comedy Fool's Gold with Hudson debuted with $21.6M. Reviews were predictably negative and some fans may have passed on the chance to see McConaughey play a cocky but lovable hunk for the umpteenth time. The studio is hoping Ghosts, which reportedly cost $50M to produce, will keep running throughout the early summer weeks since the rest of May has virtually no date movies or female-skewing comedies.

Sony's hit thriller Obsessed dropped from first to third and lost 57% of its opening weekend business grossing an estimated $12.2M pushing the ten-day cume to $47M. The decline was on the high end of what films of the type generally see and the cume to date is impressive for a $20M-budgeted pic. Look for star/executive producer Beyonc� to reach a stellar $70M by the end of the domestic run.

In its third weekend, Zac Efron's 17 Again dropped 45% to an estimated $6.4M giving Warner Bros. $48.5M to date. Paramount enjoyed the smallest drop in the top ten with DreamWorks Animation's 3D toon Monsters vs. Aliens which took in another $5.8M in its sixth adventure, according to estimates, boosting the total for the year's top-grossing blockbuster to $182.4M.

Robert Downey Jr., the king of the box office one year ago, settled for sixth place with his disappointing violinist drama The Soloist which dipped 42% to an estimated $5.6M for $18.1M in ten days. Paramount's $60M DreamWorks/Universal co-production which also stars Jamie Foxx should stumble to a $30M final tally and may be a tough sell overseas too. Disney's nature documentary Earth followed with an estimated $4.2M, down 53%, putting the 12-day sum at $21.8M. The final gross should approach $30M as well, a solid figure for a non-fiction pic.

Universal's tough guy flick Fighting dropped a hefty 62% in its second round to an estimated $4.2M. With $17.5M in ten days, look for a decent $25M by the end of the run. The G-rated fun of Hannah Montana The Movie followed declining 37% to an estimated $4.1M putting Disney at $70.9M. The girlpower flick has surpassed the $65.3M of last year's 3D concert film Hannah Montana/Miley Cyrus: Best of Both Worlds. Rounding out the top ten was State of Play which grossed an estimated $3.7M, down 47%, for a $30.9M total for Universal.

Wolverine kicked two of April's action sequels out of the top ten this weekend. Vin Diesel's franchise pic Fast & Furious grossed an estimated $2.7M, down 56%, and raised its stellar cume to $149.8M to become the year's second-biggest grosser and top-performing live-action film - for now. Universal has found that the fourth time is a charm as the new Furious has become the highest-grossing installment in the eight-year-old series. Look for a $155M domestic finish. Overseas, Fast & Furious captured an estimated $6.7M this weekend boosting the international total to $182.4M and the global gross to a stunning $332M.

Attracting a slightly smaller audience was Crank High Voltage which collapsed by 82% this weekend to an estimated $466,000 domestically. Lionsgate has taken in just $13.3M in 17 days and should conclude with a lackluster $14M for its Jason Statham vehicle, or half of the $27.8M total that 2006's Crank took in.

Crashing and burning with the worst opening of 2009 for a wide release was the animated sci-fi film Battle for Terra which stumbled to an estimated $1.1M from 1,162 theaters for a pitiful $916 average. The PG-rated film from Roadside Attractions and Lionsgate tells the story of humans trying to conquer a new planet for their survival. Moviegoers found no reason to pay top dollar to see this on the big screen.

Focus saw a strong platform debut for its crime thriller The Limits of Control which grossed an estimated $54,233 from only three locations for a sturdy $18,078 average. Directed by Jim Jarmusch, the R-rated film stars Bill Murray, Tilda Swinton, and Gael Garcia Bernal and did well despite weak reviews. Business for new independent films in general has been horrendous this year so Limits hopes to find some early summer success from arthouse crowds not in the mood for mutants, Vulcans, or terminators.

The top ten films grossed an estimated $148.4M which was exactly even with last year when Iron Man opened in the top spot with $98.6M; but was down 17% from 2007 when Spider-Man 3 debuted at number one with a then-record $151.1M.

Author: Gitesh Pandya

www.boxofficeguru.com

Related Items

Movie:	Ghosts of Girlfriends Past
	Obsessed

(1-20 of 91 posts) | Reply

Christopher B. writes:
on May 03 2009 04:58 PM

well i see wolverine met expectations on the business side of things. i had a feeling battle for terra wasn't going to do very good. can't wait for next weekend so i can boldly go see star trek.

(Reply to this)

Losingsleep writes:
on May 03 2009 05:09 PM

So much for movie piracy.

(Reply to this)

DarkShines2063 writes:
on May 03 2009 05:42 PM

its a shame about 'Crank high voltage'.i guess not many people like chev chelios anymore.

(Reply to this)

Iceman Cometh writes:
on May 03 2009 05:44 PM

i'm happy for jackman, he seems like a good guy and i think he really puts a lot into this role. however, the movie could have been a lot better than it was...

(Reply to this)

WallEField writes:
on May 03 2009 05:51 PM

The pirated copy of Wolverine did not *hurt* the film, clearly. It raised the film's exposure by leaps and bounds close to release. I wouldn't doubt that the studio itself leaked it, then denied it to raise the buzz.

(Reply to this)

King Thor writes:
on May 03 2009 05:59 PM

In reply to this comment (#2451178)
Never a good idea to leak a 'bad' and 'disappointing' movie according to many people and critics.

I haven't gotten the chance to see it yet, but I will probably have to double up my theater trip this weekend to see Wolverine and Star Trek.

I like Hugh and am glad that he is getting praise for his portrayal as Wolverine which some say is the only (and Liev as sabretooth) saving grace of this movie. Just wish he had a better script =(

(Reply to this)

jokerboy1991 writes:
on May 03 2009 06:15 PM

In reply to this comment (#2451178)
Agreed, I think its just a lousy excuse if they say that, especially when its legs are going to be weak. I think it will get over the 200 mark, if it was a lot better of a movie then it could have made so much more. I cant wait until Star Trek opens huge next weekend, which I feel extremely confident that it will.

(Reply to this)

sunsaz writes:
on May 03 2009 06:54 PM

No shockers here. Glad Fox got their payday while they could since last summer absolutely sucked for them.

Regardless of what the final reviews are, Paramount's going to clean house next weekend with Star Trek.

(Reply to this)

brandon s. writes:
on May 03 2009 07:01 PM

That's too bad about 'Terra',,,granted the reviews are just "okay" but I think the premise is interesting and, with thought-provoking subject matter, it deserves better than this...I guess I shouldn't be surprised given the pathetic, slack jawed movie goers that pack theaters to see garbage like "Hannah Montana." Wolverine could have been excellent- he is an interesting character and could have made for an extremely dark, violent and intense film (ALA Dark Knight) but instead it looks as though they chose the "all action" approach. I think it is a decent movie, Hugh Jackman and Liev are both fantastic and alone almost make the movie live up to expectations, but too many partially finished effects and a messy plot sort of put a damper on it. Better than 'Last Stand' for sure though. I cannot wait for 'Terminator: Salvation'...I hated the corny, campy and "obviously used as a tool for Arnold's campaign" Terminator 3 but this movie looks deep, dark and serious...like the original Terminator. I don't think the pg-13 rating will hurt it much, it seemed more "emotionally intense" than graphically violent.

(Reply to this)

rizzyh writes:
on May 03 2009 07:13 PM

DAMN, I still remember when Watchmen was about to release and Fox was asking for their cut, everybody assumed that it was a way for Fox to get in on the 'major' hit and still make a couple of bucks from their own comic book release. $87 million should definitely provide some incentive to make their movies a little better quality than straight up bright colored outfits and cheesy dialogue, something that i felt was representative of almost every Marvel movie (regardless of production studio) up until recently.

But if Fox is going to go back and rewrite X-Men history after releasing a trilogy, i hope they do a little better than Wolverine. I understand how important it was for Patrick Stewart to make a cameo at the end of the movie, but the whole plot of X1 was Prof X trying to figure out who Wolverine was and where he came from, so if he was telepathically present at the proceedings enough to direct Cyclops to safety, shouldn't he have been able to recall something about the main fight that those mutants were trying to run away from?

Oh well, i'm sure they'll get their act together for Magneto.

(Reply to this)

Almost.Famous writes:
on May 03 2009 07:18 PM

Hmmm doesn't it seem like every animated movie that isnt coming from dreamworks or disney tank?

(Reply to this)

King Thor writes:
on May 03 2009 07:27 PM

In reply to this comment (#2451302)
Pixar? Or is that a part of Dreamworks or Disney?

(Reply to this)

BatsInTheBelfry writes:
on May 03 2009 07:30 PM

I liked Wolverine okay. It was in too much of a rush and butchered some of the characters from the comics, but I'd say the same thing about the first X-Men film. It was much, much better than that pile of garbage known as X3, but it could've been a lot better if they'd taken more time with the Wolverine/Sabretooth relationship instead of blasting through it in the opening credits. I also would've liked to see a rougher version of the Weapon X experience. In the comics Wolverine frenzies and kills the majority of the people in the lab, in the movie he just runs away.

Could've been better, could've been worse. B-

And for reference: X-Men: B- X2: B X3: D-

(Reply to this)

Shatter24 writes:
on May 03 2009 07:42 PM

In reply to this comment (#2451171)
No, its not Chev Chelios people don't care for, it's the latest movie Crank 2, which was laughable compared to the original. Someone didn't care much for quality in making the sequel and it showed on-screen.

(Reply to this)

eastern2western writes:
on May 03 2009 08:05 PM

I think the leaked actually helped the business a little because people who saw it want to see the stupid ending with the real effects. personally, I think the movie does follow the arc of the comics pretty well and it just seems to be jackman is going to do wolverine movie till he dead because everything else he touches is dead

(Reply to this)

Draic K. writes:
on May 03 2009 08:10 PM

In reply to this comment (#2451313)
Pixar is owned by Disney

(Reply to this)

HectorMoran91 writes:
on May 03 2009 08:35 PM

Star Trek will pwn Wolverine period

(Reply to this)

Trufire writes:
on May 03 2009 08:43 PM

It is a real shame about Battle for Terra. I saw all three new releases this weekend (hazaa for working in theatres!) and Battle for Terra was the best imo. True the animation wasn't as polished as today's Pixar or Dreamworks, but only seems about 2...maybe 3 years behind. The graphics were about on par as The Incredibles imo. It told a great tale with a message as well. It is a real shame that people don't seem to get that animated movies can be serious too.

X-Men was O.K. Nothing really stood out about it imo. It seemed to want to work but never did. They would start to take in you in an interesting direction with the plot and then let it dwindle and take you in a different direction. That sucked when it could have been much more than it was.

Ghosts of Girlfriends Past.....well....it had it's moments. Not bad, but definitely a date movie at home.

(Reply to this)

Pagliacci writes:
on May 03 2009 08:50 PM

Is Wolverine worth seeing? The Dark Knight and to a much lesser extent Watchmen ruined comic book-related movies for me due to their very high superiority. I saw Spiderman 2 on TV the other night - looked absolutely ridiculous compared to TDK.

(Reply to this)

jgramsbottom writes:
on May 03 2009 09:38 PM

In reply to this comment (#2451431)
Don't waste your money and just wait till the DVD comes out. You'll especially hate it if you liked TDK and Watchmen.

(Reply to this)

Related Links

X-Men Origins: Wolverine

Related Articles

Most Discussed

Latest News

Latest Interviews

Latest Features

Sponsored Links