
Len Wein is a living legend. Whilst not known around the globe like Stan Lee, mention his name to any comic book aficionado and they'll kneel down and say things like 'we're not worthy'. Wein has been a proud superhero parent for decades -- helping give birth to Swamp Thing, Nightcrawler, Storm, Colossus and of course, Wolverine, which he helped create as a foe for The Incredible Hulk. His work in the mid '70s saw a renaissance of the X-Men and a legacy that endures to this day. As an editor, he has worked at both Marvel and DC, and was the man at the helm who helped shape Watchmen. He was inducted into the Will Eisner Hall of Fame in 2008.
As creator of Wolverine, how do you feel about the translation of your character to the big screen?
I think they've done a terrific job of translating it from one medium to the next.
When you first figured him out, did you reason why Wolverine has claws coming out between his knuckles, and not, say, his fingernails?
Well, for one thing, practicality. Frankly, it looks cooler. In point of fact, in the comics, they actually come out of the back of his hands. But that's a bitch to show on the big screen.
Plus it would be impractical -- he'd be like one of those ladies with long fingernails, make doing his hair a bit tricky.
Well there is one such character in X-Men 2 -- Lady Deathstrike, who's got razor sharp Adamantium fingernails.

Out of all the comic book movies you've seen, are there ones that resonate with you, and why?
Whenever you capture the spirit of a character. I thought Iron Man was astonishingly good, and that's as much the casting as anything else -- once you hire Robert Downey Jr. as Tony Stark, you're done. Almost everything you do after that is gravy. I thought the new Hulk movie was great -- once again, Edward Norton was a terrific Bruce Banner. Some of the others didn't work quite as well -- Catwoman, I don't think was a particularly good film.
I think most people will agree with you on that.
But when you capture the sense of a character, translating from one medium to the next, any changes are fine. That line from the first X-Men film -- "What did you expect, yellow Spandex?" -- black leather outfits work just fine by me!
You've worked with some of the greats in the comic book world, as well as being one of them. What does working with Stan Lee teach you?
Never lose your sense of enthusiasm!
What about the Watchmen boys, Dave Gibbons and Alan Moore?
Never lose your sense of dismay!
You actually edited Watchmen -- in what way could you corral those creative forces?
It was a challenge. It certainly was a challenge. I have gone on print and online as saying I never liked the ending, I felt it was a bit askew. I thought the ending in the film worked better, but Alan is Alan. You take the good with the bad. You want that work crafted, that ability to sculpt a line like nobody else's business, you put up with mismatched socks and an inability to spell... it works out splendidly!
Rumours are that the next Wolverine movie will be the "Japanese Story" -- what do you want to see happen in the next one?
I just want to see them explore the characters more. I think the Japanese Story, if that's where they're going to go -- and I imagine they are going there for the next story -- is the perfect next choice. It gives you a whole other side of the character and allows you to explore aspects that have never been seen on film before -- the noble warrior, as opposed to the berserker.
X-Men Origins: Wolverine is out now on DVD and Blu-ray.
|
GreenBastard writes: on Oct 15 2009 11:34 PM First! (Reply to this) |
|
Floor Man writes: on Oct 16 2009 12:17 AM In reply to this comment (#2553542) (Really? I'm so tired of this "I'M FIRST OMG!" stuff.) Great interview, even if it was short. :) (Reply to this) |
|
will s. writes: on Oct 16 2009 01:20 AM floor man, don't be jealous. (Reply to this) |
|
Skelerax V. writes: on Oct 16 2009 02:10 AM Hopefully the second one will add some more depth to the character than the first one. I'm with floor man, "first" is ultra lame, what an idiotic thing to post. (Reply to this) |
|
martinscorsese25 writes: on Oct 16 2009 03:28 AM it's interesting that he didn't mention The Dark Knight. i thought thats the best comic book movie or superhero movie i have ever seen. my best comic book movies 1. TDK 2. Batman Begins 3. Sin City(300 my ***! this is the "Citizen Kane" of graphic novel) 4. Spiderman 2(so good that it really is a tragedy on what happened on 3) 5. X2(very very entertaining and very well paced. plus the ending is really strong) best superhero movies *just remove Sin City and put Ironman on number 5* (Reply to this) |
|
martinscorsese25 writes: on Oct 16 2009 03:45 AM also, on XMEN Origin:Wolverine i saw it on DVD. the effects were horrible. i never saw the "leaked" version. they said it had wires and all sorts of undone effects. to be honest, the version that i saw doesnt really feel like the effects were well done either. a friend of mine said that there isnt really much difference except the wires are gone. it's sad that even the effects(which is usually done good on Superhero movies no matter how bad the movie is) isnt well done. everytime i see Hugh Jackman in the movie, it really feels he is doing the best he can and that he really loves the character. but the movie is just BAD. i doubt Gavin Hood's heart was really in the movie when he was making it. if he has passion for the project, he'd confront the producers himself and demand a better script. that's why i like what Matthew Vaughn did in X3. he felt the movie he was gonna make was awful so better do something than nothing. that's a guy who has passion on what he's making (Reply to this) |
|
De4ective Detectiv3 writes: on Oct 16 2009 04:41 AM They totally ruined this character. I don't know what movie this guy saw, but I'm sure he made plenty of money seeing as how he invented the character. Nevertheless, deep down he must be disappointed. It's not like Wolvy is the deepest character but still, they really phoned this movie in. I would put it right up there w/ Batman and Robin in terms of how horrible it was. (Reply to this) |
|
ClericPreston writes: on Oct 16 2009 05:34 AM It's pretty bad when a video game intro is 100% better than a movie with a $100 million budget. This is what a good wolverine movie could be htt (Reply to this) |
|
Confounded writes: on Oct 16 2009 07:23 AM Where's the passion? Where's the artist's flare? You have to believe deep down this guy is wishing he had his own set of claws so he could tear apart every person that made Origins happen. As a Wolvie fan, there were no redeeming qualities to that film aside from a couple little inside-joke lines. I mean, they put in the Blob for the sole purpose of a boxing match? Right now it seems there are only three choices, and only one would satisfy me. Either he's just being polite; or he sold out to Hollywood; or he's crazier than Alan Moore. I mean, say what you want about Moore's eccentric character and distaste for all things "adaptation," but he's going to stick to his guns and flat out tell you he hates you for what you've done. Grow a spine man. You saying it's great won't make it great. (Reply to this) |
|
opTIMus Nerd writes: on Oct 16 2009 07:56 AM I think he might have actually liked it. Not everyone takes this stuff as deeply serious as so many on here seem to. To each their own of course, just seems some of us in the commenteriat are uber-hard on everything. Sometimes it's fun to hate on stuff on the internet but sometimes some of you hate so much and so hard I begin to wonder if any of you ever like or enjoy anything. While Wolverine wasn't the best comic flick ever, ever..It wasn't all that bad either. No characters got ruined as that only matters in the eye of the beholder. (Reply to this) |
|
Not L. writes: on Oct 16 2009 08:16 AM What I wanna know is... if Wolverines claws retract into his hand/forearm... how does he bend his wrist?? (Reply to this) |
|
Christine V. writes: on Oct 16 2009 08:25 AM Len Wein sees no creator money for Wolverine. It would be nice, thank you very much, and he truly deserves it. He's lucky if Marvel decides to send a check when it reprints comics. Unlike Paul Levits at DC Comics, who has gone out of his way to make sure that creators have been equitably remunerated for older works, Marvel has never had a leader with a conscience or that kind of enlightened self-interest. What Len has gotten out of this is a great deal of respectful treatment from Hugh Jackman, Lauren Shuler Donner, and Gavin Hood. And, by the way, you can not pay Len Wein to say something he doesn't believe. Len and I genuinely love Hugh Jackman's portrayal of Wolverine, which goes back to the concepts he had at the character's inception--not the berserker, but the human desperately trying to control his baser instincts. As we watched the film, we were thrilled to see that come through and that was the first thing we said to Hugh--who couldn't wait for Len's reaction--and Lauren when the film ended. A perfect movie? Of course not. But we were entertained. By the way, Len did like The Dark Knight very much. Especially Morgan Freeman as Lucius Fox. We were incredibly grateful to DC for the creator check on that character that arrived the day after our house burned. Nobody at Marvel ever sent s much as a condolence. (Reply to this) |
|
Not L. writes: on Oct 16 2009 08:28 AM That doesn't answer my claws/wrist question (Reply to this) |
|
De4ective Detectiv3 writes: on Oct 16 2009 08:32 AM In reply to this comment (#2553624) I don't think that's the case at all - its not that we are being 'uber' hard. I mean, have you actually seen this movie? They totally turn Wolverine into a generic action star, and even by those standards this movie still fails! This is one of Marvel's flagship characters - you would think, even with this being fox, they would realize the potential there. It didn't seem like anyone involved in this movie had any passion for what they were making. I find it highly amusing that people give Transformers so much ****(which it deserves) but they can overlook the fact that Wolverine was just as dumb simply because it features a beloved comic book hero. Even I don't have enough blind fanboy devotion to get behind this movie. (Reply to this) |
|
David W. writes: on Oct 16 2009 08:38 AM In reply to this comment (#2553624) @opTIMus Nerd Amen. Honestly, I don't understand why people hate on movies like this so much. Could it have been better? Of course. But I also feel that it could have been A LOT worse. And whoever compared this to Batman and Robin should be shot. (Reply to this) |
|
Confounded writes: on Oct 16 2009 08:45 AM In reply to this comment (#2553624) Cool guys don't look at explosions. That's how they ruined it. When you're the butt of an Andy Samberg joke, you are ruined. I will always be impressed by Jackman's Wolvie. I think he was an amazing choice and he has taken the role to heart. For that, I am greatly appreciative. But a movie is more than a marquee star. Jackman was just the duct tape holding together an '87 Ford Tempo. He was great, the movie they gave him was crap, and what they did to Deadpool is unforgiveable. (Reply to this) |
|
mike c. writes: on Oct 16 2009 09:46 AM It's great to see Wolverine on screen if only for the opportunity to see the movies/stories get better. Unfortunately, this character was ruined by the comics industry prior to the big screen. Wolverine's most interesting feature was the fact that we did not know the full story of his origin. And it should have stayed that way!!! But Marvel stripped that away. Fine, everyone needs to make a buck regardless of the expense. But to me the first Wolverine movie should have been the Weapon X story. If anyone has read that series i am sure you will agree. And to take that amazing story and compress it to once scene of a water tank and 20 needles is a sin! The mental, spiritual and physical torture that Wolverine had to endure is what shaped the character we knew and loved in the comics. I just hope round two has more edge and grit that the character deserves. (Reply to this) |
|
DanielthePhantasm XIX writes: on Oct 16 2009 10:03 AM Wolverine should be in more R-rated territory (Reply to this) |
|
Jane Doe writes: on Oct 16 2009 11:00 AM The weapon x comic series was brilliant and the 5 minutes they devoted to that in the movie was crap. Studios worry about cramming too many popular characters into one movie that we lose the story. i.e.(SM3, Batman n Robin, Weapon X). I know the kids want to see Venom, want to see 7 villains, need a love interest, but some of these original books/novels can stand on their own as is. TDK and Begins were great because it focused on the story vs. more and more characters as did spidey 2. Sorry for the fanboy rant but there it is. The Japanese Story for Wolvy 2 would be a great idea if they stay close to the series, odds are they will feel the need to add unneeded super villains, dinosaurs or Samuel L Jackson. (Reply to this) |
|
Matanuki writes: on Oct 16 2009 11:59 AM In reply to this comment (#2553589) Deep down he must be disappointed? So now your highbrow savvy allows that you call foul on what a creator thinks about the rendition of his own sh.t. Hmm. Well, I've been remiss then. The Force is much stronger in you than I thought. (Reply to this) |
| You must be registered to post comments. Login or Register. |









