Young Turks (2013)
Art critic Hunter Drohojowska, writing about Stephen Seemayer's "Young Turks" in the L.A. Weekly in 1981, called the rough-cut verson "a kaleidoscopic melange of Hollywood's B-movie corn, bizarre underground existence and a few naked truths." "Artists are portrayed earnestly explaining their work in one scene," Drohojowska wrote, "and participating in some hallucinogenic madness in the next." While the film about art and life in downtown L.A. circa 1980 has been fully digitized and reedited by Pamela Wilson, the filmmakers have attempted to maintain the energetic quality noted by Drohojowska while giving some structure to the "inherent irony and absurd juxtapositions." "It's a rare art movie that can keep me awake for two hours, but this one manages," Drohojowska wrote, citing the original rough-cut's length. (The newly edited version is a fast-paced 95 minutes.) "For one thing, the editing is riotous, crowded with consciously trite, humorous special-effects techniques. ... All of this is entertaining and decorative, so if the movie is somewhat self-indulgent, at least it isn't dull." "Everything about 'Young Turks' strikes me as something of an L.A. phenomenon," Drohojowska wrote. "It's an extremely personal work, more about a lifestyle than art. It remains, nonetheless, a valid document, because it shows how the art created was so intimately involved in the style of life led." (c) Downtown Independent … More
No Friends? Inconceivable! Log in to see what your friends have to say.Login
Critic Reviews for Young Turks
Audience Reviews for Young Turks
There are no audience reviews yet. Hurry, submit your review so you can be first!
Discuss Young Turks on our Movie forum!