It's Official: Daniel Craig is 007
ComingSoon.net shares with us the long-in-coming announcement, and it's one that shouldn't stun any of the astute movie geeks: British actor Daniel Craig has been signed to play everyone's favorite superspy, James Bond. The next 007 adventure, "Casino Royale," goes before the cameras early next year.
Mr. Craig is probably best known for his excellent performance in Matthew Vaughn's "Layer Cake," but the guy's been doing great character work for years.
After making his cinematic debut in John Avildsen's "The Power of One" (1992), Craig appeared in such films as "Elizabeth" (1998), "Lara Croft: Tomb Raider" (2001), "Road to Perdition" (2002), "Sylvia" (2003), "Enduring Love" (2004), and "The Jacket" (2005). The actor just finished work on Steven Spielberg's "Munich" and is now filming Oliver Hirschbiegel's thriller "The Visiting."
Let the Bond discussions begin in full swing, but we think Mr. Craig is a fine choice. Now all the producers have to do is replace their screenwriters and we just might get a Bond adventure that's worthy of the legendary character.
Mr. Craig is probably best known for his excellent performance in Matthew Vaughn's "Layer Cake," but the guy's been doing great character work for years.
After making his cinematic debut in John Avildsen's "The Power of One" (1992), Craig appeared in such films as "Elizabeth" (1998), "Lara Croft: Tomb Raider" (2001), "Road to Perdition" (2002), "Sylvia" (2003), "Enduring Love" (2004), and "The Jacket" (2005). The actor just finished work on Steven Spielberg's "Munich" and is now filming Oliver Hirschbiegel's thriller "The Visiting."
Let the Bond discussions begin in full swing, but we think Mr. Craig is a fine choice. Now all the producers have to do is replace their screenwriters and we just might get a Bond adventure that's worthy of the legendary character.
Related Items
|
scottybarkbark writes: on Oct 14 2005 08:38 AM damn i wanted clive owen (Reply to this) |
|
lavatory love machine writes: on Oct 14 2005 08:51 AM I only saw him in road to perdition and didn't make much of an impresion on me after seeing him in the brothers grimm heath legedr was my favourite for bond, maybe a little short but very amusing (Reply to this) |
|
xavieric writes: on Oct 14 2005 08:52 AM I am so incredibly excited by this news. Daniel Craig IS James Bond. I can't stop saying it over and over again in my head. We're in for an amazing ride. (Reply to this) |
|
MC. writes: on Oct 14 2005 08:54 AM Since Bond has to be at least 6' it's interesting how short many actors are these days. (Reply to this) |
|
inessalenin writes: on Oct 14 2005 08:56 AM In reply to this comment (#826724) Clive Owen have no interest to play Bond! Neither Colin Ferrel! (Reply to this) |
|
arpeggio191 writes: on Oct 14 2005 10:48 AM In reply to this comment (#826728) [b]you are correct.[/b] Clive owen would have been cool, collin farrel would have sucked ass, but you're right, neither of them wanted to do it. he's the best of the choices (Reply to this) |
|
Eros_Amor writes: on Oct 14 2005 11:08 AM talk about LAME! that guy is a NOOB of all NOOBS! bring back Sean Connary! this is one bond flim im NOT going to see (Reply to this) |
|
OutToLunch25 writes: on Oct 14 2005 12:19 PM [b]Awful Choice[/b] It's obvious why Craig got the job. All the other candidates were unwilling to sign a multi-picture contract and/or they wanted a lot of money. Hugh Jackman, Clive Owen, Ewan McGregor, Colin Farrell, and Orlando Bloom aren't exactly having trouble finding work, which means they can get away with asking for a lot of money. How sad that the guy who got the roll is ranked near the bottom in most online polls. Brosnan probably did ask for a lot of money, but so what? He deserves it. His Bond movies have made a lot of money, despite the awful writing. The Bond producers are just cheap. Daniel Craig may be a good actor, but he's all wrong for the part. He doesn't look charming and sophisticated, he doesn't look like the kind of man who can seduce women easily, and he's not the actor fans look forward to seeing as Bond. (Reply to this) |
|
lovelykeira writes: on Oct 14 2005 12:36 PM Replace their screenwriters, bullshit, Haggis is writing this and he is damn good. (Reply to this) |
|
dmcmanus99 writes: on Oct 14 2005 12:43 PM [b]Daniel Craig will do fine[/b] Have any of you seen Layer Cake??? There is not one mention of that movie through this thread. He was great in that movie, and in my opinion was the role that made him 007.. until you see Layer Cake you naysayers really don't have any idea what your talking about.. Great role in a great movie! Welcome to the Layer Cake son (Reply to this) |
|
InfinityCorp writes: on Oct 14 2005 12:56 PM I've posted previously and extensively about this subject. Again, Craig is the best choice out of the actors they were going to choose from. But... I am sorry to say NOT casting Brosnan for his 5th film is a galactic mistake. Poor Craig has shoes to fill that are far to large for him... I still don't understand. People say it was Brosnan asking for too much money. Well, I did some research and he was asking roughly $12-14 million for "Casino Royale". I'm sorry his last 4 films grossed approx. $1.5 billion.... Yep, $1.5 billion. $12 million is a drop in the bucket. I wish Daniel Craig all the best. I love the Bond films. Not bringing Brosnan back is a huge mistake. Period. (Reply to this) |
|
maverick_2k writes: on Oct 14 2005 01:12 PM [b]Timothy Dalton with blond hair[/b] This choice stinnks. The Bond character has been so overdone it's unreal. They should have kept Brosnan for one more film and then did away with the Bond character and franchise. Heck, Roger Moore in his 70's would have made a better choice than someone like Craig. The series has grown totally stale and old. The screenwriters, including Paul Haggis, are uncapable of writing a screenplay that can compare to the great Bond films of the 1960's. I truly think this will be the worst bond ever. (Reply to this) |
|
mizzoucritic writes: on Oct 14 2005 01:32 PM [b]A great pick[/b] This is the best movie news all week! Craig's work in "Layer Cake" was excellent and his incarnation of 007 will likely be the deepest, most well-rounded Bond of them all. I was getting tired of Brosnan and had they chosed him again, I probably wouldn't have wanted to see "Casino Royale." And with Haggis writing the adaptation, this is going to be great! (Reply to this) |
|
maverick_2k writes: on Oct 14 2005 01:40 PM In reply to this comment (#826736) [b]Disagree[/b] The problem is there has already been a good young Bond, you might remember a Guy named Sean Connery who played him. Craig looks like another stiff actor who will play the character with a dark edgy tone much like Dalton did. The issue is that this has already been done, and the results were . . . umm Pierce Brosnan as Bond. So there you have it, Craig will last one film and Sony will be signing an aging Brosnan to star in the film after this disaster. (Reply to this) |
|
sparetime writes: on Oct 14 2005 02:32 PM thank the bond gods... no more pretty fancy schmancy bond stuff please. craig should be able to pull bond back to his womanizing roots. this is good news. very good news. (Reply to this) |
|
jaydurden writes: on Oct 14 2005 02:43 PM [b]I dunno about his...[/b] I really think that this flick will be a commercial flop...I'm not saying it won't be good but the problem is that pierce brosnan was probably the most beloved james bond ever (i'm not saying he was the best). When people see daniel craig on the trailer for the first time (cause most people won't know about the new james bond before the movie begins its commercial campaign) they'll all freak out. First, because they didn't know that pierce brosnan was gone. Then, because most people have no clue who daniel craig is. and lastly, let's admit it, he's not an ugly guy but he's just tough and weird looking. for my part I don't mind Craig, he's a decent actor and i think he'll do ok...but i'm still angry at the producer for being so ungrateful towards brosnan...anyway, will have to wait and see (Reply to this) |
|
UselessRob writes: on Oct 14 2005 08:08 PM [b]Oh look, another killer satellite...[/b] Hey I wasn't sure Brosnan would be any good until he started, so I figure lets wait and see how this guy does. But lets hope it's got a better story than DAD has. I mean come on people, it was just another stupid killer satellite! And lets hope John Cleese is still on board. (Reply to this) |
|
TheAnswerMVP2001 writes: on Oct 14 2005 11:26 PM [b]Casino Royale[/b] Great is this going to be the remake of the Woody Allen film with the same title, which was actually a James Bond spoof? (Reply to this) |
|
sokiveta.com writes: on Oct 15 2005 01:56 AM [b]you can buy anything with money[/b] I like Daniel Craig, but I'm a long-time James Bond fan and I was hoping that they would have just offered Pierce Brosnan more money. I feel like there is a pattern emerging with actors who play James Bond: ugly, handsome, ugly, handsome, ugly, handsome, and now we're back to ugly. (Reply to this) |
|
Mr. Mojo Risin' writes: on Oct 15 2005 03:16 PM It seems like Jude Law would have made the best Bond. (Reply to this) |
| You must be registered to post comments. Login or Register. |






