"Iron Man" Flees New Line and Heads Back Home to Marvel
For two years an "Iron Man" languished over at New Line, but the rights to the character have recently reverted back to the Marvel-eers, and uber-producer Avi Arad seems pretty excited about getting the adaptation ramped up at home.
According to Variety, "Marvel has raised $525 million from Merrill Lynch to produce up to 10 films. Because "Iron Man" isn't part of that deal, Marvel would have to get separate funds to produce the pic itself.
Project hit numerous snags at New Line. Late last year, studio announced Nick Cassavetes was attached to direct, but it turned out the "Notebook" helmer never had a deal.
Drafts by Alfred Gough & Miles Millar ("Smallville") and David Hayter ("X-Men") didn't get traction.
Arad expressed frustration in March that the Cassavetes deal fell through, so it wasn't a surprise that he took the project back when New Line's option expired this summer.
Marvel will now start development from scratch, commissioning a new script and possibly attaching a director before deciding whether to finance the pic itself or license it again.
Cassavetes remains a candidate to direct, Arad said.
If Marvel ends up making "Iron Man" itself, it could be one of its highest-profile projects. Most films in its Merrill Lynch-financed slate, like "Ant Man" and "Power Pack," are based on characters little known outside the comicbook world, save for "Captain America.""
According to Variety, "Marvel has raised $525 million from Merrill Lynch to produce up to 10 films. Because "Iron Man" isn't part of that deal, Marvel would have to get separate funds to produce the pic itself.
Project hit numerous snags at New Line. Late last year, studio announced Nick Cassavetes was attached to direct, but it turned out the "Notebook" helmer never had a deal.
Drafts by Alfred Gough & Miles Millar ("Smallville") and David Hayter ("X-Men") didn't get traction.
Arad expressed frustration in March that the Cassavetes deal fell through, so it wasn't a surprise that he took the project back when New Line's option expired this summer.
Marvel will now start development from scratch, commissioning a new script and possibly attaching a director before deciding whether to finance the pic itself or license it again.
Cassavetes remains a candidate to direct, Arad said.
If Marvel ends up making "Iron Man" itself, it could be one of its highest-profile projects. Most films in its Merrill Lynch-financed slate, like "Ant Man" and "Power Pack," are based on characters little known outside the comicbook world, save for "Captain America.""
Related Items
| Celeb: | Avi Arad |
| Nick Cassavetes | |
| Alfred Gough | |
| Miles Millar | |
| David Hayter | |
| Movie: | The Notebook |
| Smallville - Season 1 | |
| X-Men |
|
cgcbooks writes: on Nov 04 2005 01:46 PM [b]Who in the hell knows Iron Man?[/b] Does anybody really think an Iron Man movie would even be worth a rental? Marvel must be getting desperate. Stick to doing comic books. (Reply to this) |
|
slqrick writes: on Nov 04 2005 04:05 PM iron man is a comic book... (Reply to this) |
|
nazgul writes: on Nov 04 2005 08:59 PM he means just comics and not do any movies. if done right this could be one hell of a movie. (Reply to this) |
|
pota1967 writes: on Nov 04 2005 09:06 PM If they couldnt get the Hulk right--I dont hold out much hope for Iron Man Boy, did that Hulk movie ever suck!! (Reply to this) |
|
Now it's dark writes: on Nov 05 2005 09:04 AM I. Am. Iron. Man. (Reply to this) |
|
Minister2B writes: on Nov 06 2005 09:10 AM I didn't like Hulk, DareDevil was ok. Marvel, however, is doing really well with the XMen and Spiderman series. Hopefully, an Iron Man will have the same type of script. Not an Iron Man comic reader myself, the biggest problem with most of these scripts is the injection of the love interest as a side-bar issue. Weakened Hulk, weakened DareDevil. After the disasters of the 1979 and 1992 Capt America scripts (a tiny plastic shield? Cinematography that looked mid-60s?) I hope that if they do this one again, they would stick closer to the Marvel story line like the Superman script did with DC. Capt America script deserves better than it got in 1992. (Reply to this) |
|
Assassin writes: on Nov 06 2005 10:18 AM In reply to this comment (#827439) I'm sorry the Hulk didn't pander to your juevenile tastes and instead aimed to please an adult audience. The Hulk is one of my favorite comic book movies and found it to be far more engaging than the childrens films like spiderman and the original 4 batmans. (Reply to this) |
|
pota1967 writes: on Nov 06 2005 11:37 AM In reply to this comment (#827442) [b]juvenile tastes HA![/b] Comic books are for kids (and us kids at heart) well, they were years ago anyway. When I read The Incredible Hulk comic in the 70s it took me away to far away places, so maybe the Hulk movie was trying to be too adult and ended up being kind of boring and no fun. Spiderman was faithful to the comic and it was amazing--like a comic book coming to life. On a side note. I think I remember liking the 1979 versions of Captain America and I think it is funny if the show is on Sci-Fi channel Stan (huckster) Lee will say how great it was but if he is doing an interview with lets say Wizard magazine he will say it was crap (Reply to this) |
|
se7en85 writes: on Nov 07 2005 06:59 PM In reply to this comment (#827442) eat a dick you fag The hulk was fucking BORING. Now despite the attempts to make it all serious and what not, it failed. i'm right your wrong. movie was boring fuck ang lee (Reply to this) |
|
Lux Obscura writes: on Jan 03 2006 12:52 AM In reply to this comment (#827444) ...yeah so you are what 7...8. Listen princess, does your 'mommy' know you use words like that. I also thought Hulk wan't that bad of a movie. (Reply to this) |
| You must be registered to post comments. Login or Register. |




