"Hills" Remake Too Intense for an R Rating!
Those who bemoan the current state of PG-13-ish horror (like me) should find this report from Empire Online to be an equal dose of good news and bad. The upcoming remake of "The Hills Have Eyes" has recently received an NC-17 from the MPAA, and producer Wes Craven is required to deliver an R. So it's back to the editing booth for director Alex Aja ... at least until the DVD comes out.
"If you thought that Wes Craven’s 1977 horror classic "The Hills Have Eyes," in which a suburban family are terrorised in the desert by a family of inbred mutants, was too intense and disturbing, then prepare yourself for the forthcoming remake – because you ain’t seen nothing yet.
Says who? Well, Craven himself, who’s producing the new movie, directed this time by "Switchblade Romance" ("High Tension") helmer, Alexandre Aja. At the moment, the new "Hills" – starring Aaron Stanford, Kathleen Quinlan and Ted Levine – is so intense and gory that the American ratings board, the MPAA, have given it the dreaded NC-17, aka commercial suicide.
“It’s a very strong picture and we’re trying to figure out what to do with that, without ruining it,” says a perplexed Craven, speaking to Empire yesterday. “We have to deliver an R rating. We looked at it last night in the screening room and before we started, we said to Alex ‘what do you think?’ And he said ‘this is a PG-13 now’. And one of our producers said ‘Alex, can we commit you to an insane asylum if this isn’t an R?’ and then he showed it to us and ohmigod, there’s no way you would get an R for that.”
Craven confirmed that Aja is still cutting the movie, and with a March 10 release date (both here and in the States), there’s plenty of time to meet the MPAA’s strict demands. But don’t worry, gore fans – “We can put it all full strength on the DVD, though,” laughs Craven. “We’ll be able to do that.”"
Head on over to Empire Online for the entire juicy scoop, but tread lightly, newcomers; there's spoilers in them "Hills"!
"If you thought that Wes Craven’s 1977 horror classic "The Hills Have Eyes," in which a suburban family are terrorised in the desert by a family of inbred mutants, was too intense and disturbing, then prepare yourself for the forthcoming remake – because you ain’t seen nothing yet.
Says who? Well, Craven himself, who’s producing the new movie, directed this time by "Switchblade Romance" ("High Tension") helmer, Alexandre Aja. At the moment, the new "Hills" – starring Aaron Stanford, Kathleen Quinlan and Ted Levine – is so intense and gory that the American ratings board, the MPAA, have given it the dreaded NC-17, aka commercial suicide.
“It’s a very strong picture and we’re trying to figure out what to do with that, without ruining it,” says a perplexed Craven, speaking to Empire yesterday. “We have to deliver an R rating. We looked at it last night in the screening room and before we started, we said to Alex ‘what do you think?’ And he said ‘this is a PG-13 now’. And one of our producers said ‘Alex, can we commit you to an insane asylum if this isn’t an R?’ and then he showed it to us and ohmigod, there’s no way you would get an R for that.”
Craven confirmed that Aja is still cutting the movie, and with a March 10 release date (both here and in the States), there’s plenty of time to meet the MPAA’s strict demands. But don’t worry, gore fans – “We can put it all full strength on the DVD, though,” laughs Craven. “We’ll be able to do that.”"
Head on over to Empire Online for the entire juicy scoop, but tread lightly, newcomers; there's spoilers in them "Hills"!
Related Items
| Celeb: | Wes Craven |
| Alexandre Aja | |
| Aaron Stanford | |
| Kathleen Quinlan | |
| Ted Levine | |
| Movie: | High Tension |
| The Hills Have Eyes |
|
killthemall4444 writes: on Nov 30 2005 10:23 AM well at this is probably a good thing because it means Craven in going full on. He probably will only have to cut a little bit to get an R. SOunds like a good movie. (Reply to this) |
|
Reel 2/Dialogue 2 writes: on Nov 30 2005 11:49 AM When was the last time violence, by itself, garnered an NC-17? [i]Hollow Man[/i]? (Reply to this) |
|
HoneycombSAFARI writes: on Nov 30 2005 03:55 PM craven origionally got an NC 17 for scream so he had to cut it. For scream 2 they decided to make it as gory as possible so that when it got an NC 17 they could know what to cut. However scream 2 got an r straight away because miramax liked the "message". While i doubt that hills has a strong moral message, these movies are best enjoyed when there's gore aplenty. In Australia, our equivelent of NC 17 is MA, which 15 year olds can see. Sux to be u (Reply to this) |
|
kenporules writes: on Nov 30 2005 04:50 PM Sounds like a good DVD. (Reply to this) |
|
scottybarkbark writes: on Nov 30 2005 06:24 PM no leave it with nc-17 (Reply to this) |
|
haelohm writes: on Nov 30 2005 07:56 PM [b]grrr[/b] i hate MPAA...america is over censored (Reply to this) |
|
pota1967 writes: on Dec 01 2005 09:16 AM [b]re: NC-17[/b] I dont know about anyone else but when I reached 17 and could see any movie, after a while, I didnt even think of the rating only if the movie sounded good or not. side note--with my new rule of not going to see movie remakes, sequels, or tv shows into movies I wont be seeing this anyway. The only exception will be Final Destination 3 but if there is a FD 4 I wont be watching that one. (Reply to this) |
|
killthemall4444 writes: on Dec 01 2005 10:58 AM In reply to this comment (#828284) that funny considering australia has such strict videogame laws yet fifteen year olds can see anything they want. (Reply to this) |
|
lilegs86 writes: on Dec 01 2005 01:11 PM out of all the sequels coming out, the only one you picked to watch was final destination 3? (Reply to this) |
|
pota1967 writes: on Dec 02 2005 08:11 AM In reply to this comment (#828290) [b]lilegs86[/b] Yup :-) Is there any other sequels worth seeing?--maybe I missed one, but it cant be a comic book or tv related sequel (Reply to this) |
| You must be registered to post comments. Login or Register. |





