Cannes Winner Ken Loach Faces British Press Attack
After winning the Palme d'Or with "The Wind That Shakes The Barley," English director Ken Loach has found harsher critics on his home turf than those in attendance at this year's Cannes Film Festival.
"Wind," a brutal war story of two Irish brothers politicized and torn apart by the Irish Civil War of the early 1920s, was a surprise win at Cannes. Reviews were mixed, but the film's selection to take the festival's top honor seemed a validation of its historical theme, championing a voice (early Irish Republicans battling the British empire) that is seldom heard.
With "Wind" opening in British theaters next week, some members of the British press have wasted no time in blasting Loach for his film's politics. Articles in "The Sun," "The Daily Mail," and "The Times" heavily criticize Loach's Irish sympathies, realized onscreen in "Wind" in the vilification of the British-backed Black and Tans militia and the involvement of its protagonist (played by Cillian Murphy) in the IRA's guerilla organization.
In a candid interview with UK paper "The Guardian," Loach defends himself against the political wave of criticism surrounding his film (among which he's been compared to Hitler lenswoman Leni Riefenstahl and called a traitor to his country). Loach is a public figure in the leftist RESPECT political party; many of his detractors are avowed Conservatives.
Loach also makes the point that, although 300 prints of "Wind" have been bought for theatrical distribution in France, only 40 have been requested in England. As of yet, the Cannes first-place winner has not secured North American distribution, despite its high-profile win last month.
To read the "Guardian" interview, click here.
"Wind," a brutal war story of two Irish brothers politicized and torn apart by the Irish Civil War of the early 1920s, was a surprise win at Cannes. Reviews were mixed, but the film's selection to take the festival's top honor seemed a validation of its historical theme, championing a voice (early Irish Republicans battling the British empire) that is seldom heard.
With "Wind" opening in British theaters next week, some members of the British press have wasted no time in blasting Loach for his film's politics. Articles in "The Sun," "The Daily Mail," and "The Times" heavily criticize Loach's Irish sympathies, realized onscreen in "Wind" in the vilification of the British-backed Black and Tans militia and the involvement of its protagonist (played by Cillian Murphy) in the IRA's guerilla organization.
In a candid interview with UK paper "The Guardian," Loach defends himself against the political wave of criticism surrounding his film (among which he's been compared to Hitler lenswoman Leni Riefenstahl and called a traitor to his country). Loach is a public figure in the leftist RESPECT political party; many of his detractors are avowed Conservatives.
Loach also makes the point that, although 300 prints of "Wind" have been bought for theatrical distribution in France, only 40 have been requested in England. As of yet, the Cannes first-place winner has not secured North American distribution, despite its high-profile win last month.
To read the "Guardian" interview, click here.
Related Items
| Celeb: | Ken Loach |
| Cillian Murphy | |
| Movie: |
|
Now it's dark writes: on Jun 16 2006 01:57 PM Face it England: your empire's gone. (Reply to this) |
|
insanemansam5 writes: on Jun 17 2006 05:49 AM Who knew people still cared about 1920's politics. Honestly isn't this sort of like people who are the ancestors of slave owners complaining about the depection of slave owners in movie? (Reply to this) |
|
insanemansam5 writes: on Jun 17 2006 06:10 AM Check out what this person from the UK, persumably a member of the press, since this hasn't been released commercially yet, had to say: "Whether you like this film depends purely on what side of its political argument you stand. It's a film that takes a position and brooks no argument, tolerates no discussion or different opinion. If you don't agree with Loach, well, I'm afraid you're going to Hell forever. Of you do agree, then you're one of the immortal heroes of the revolution. Simple as that. So, if you agree with him, you'll click on 'no' as to whether you found the review useful. If you don't, you'll click 'yes.' Neither will have anything to do with the film. Which is the trouble. Look at it dispassionately and it's not much good." Personally I think this review wasn't helpful to me because I have no idea what the political issues surrounding this film are so I clicked 'no'. More to come later.... (Reply to this) |
|
insanemansam5 writes: on Jun 17 2006 06:10 AM Check out what this person from the UK, persumably a member of the press, since this hasn't been released commercially yet, had to say: "Whether you like this film depends purely on what side of its political argument you stand. It's a film that takes a position and brooks no argument, tolerates no discussion or different opinion. If you don't agree with Loach, well, I'm afraid you're going to Hell forever. Of you do agree, then you're one of the immortal heroes of the revolution. Simple as that. So, if you agree with him, you'll click on 'no' as to whether you found the review useful. If you don't, you'll click 'yes.' Neither will have anything to do with the film. Which is the trouble. Look at it dispassionately and it's not much good." Personally I think this review wasn't helpful to me because I have no idea what the political issues surrounding this film are so I clicked 'no'. More to come later.... (Reply to this) |
|
cowsfan writes: on Jun 19 2006 12:22 AM The British press attack anything moving with some sort of celebrity attached. They hate success. But they love living vicariously through their whirlwind brand of tabloidism. I lived in the UK for a while. Have family there. Miserable weather and plenty to complain about. This is nothing new. (Reply to this) |
| You must be registered to post comments. Login or Register. |




