ROTTEN TOMATOES: "28 Weeks Later:" Sequel Signs a Leading Man Comments

"28 Weeks Later:" Sequel Signs a Leading Man

by Scott Weinberg | August 24, 2006

Summary

You might not know the name, but odds are you'd recognize the face... Fox has signed actor Jeremy Renner to star as a heroic soldier in their "28 Days Later" sequel -- but if you remember what happened in the first movie, you know that the "heroic soldier" types don't always last that long. Back to Article

(1-9 of 9 posts) | Reply

Ashron writes:
on Aug 24 2006 08:05 AM

That's great to see him getting such a good part. I think he's talented and, based on the show on A&E that followed struggling actors (wish I could remember the name of it) he seems like a really nice guy.

(Reply to this)

timov writes:
on Aug 24 2006 09:20 AM

In reply to this comment (#843003)
what the crap? this movie doesn't need a sequel. the first was perfect - just leave it at that! I hope it doesn't suck.

(Reply to this)

unbreakable_samurai writes:
on Aug 24 2006 10:24 AM

I do like Jeremy Renner, but I still can't help but have major doubts about this. The first one was awsome and I don't see how they can match it without Boyle at the helm.

(Reply to this)

ddp73 writes:
on Aug 24 2006 12:24 PM

[b]What[/b]
So is the new title going to be "180 Days Later", I mean really why do they have to make a sequel to this. Just make some other Zombie movie with a different title, I mean c'mon.

(Reply to this)

dylan21484nj writes:
on Aug 24 2006 01:24 PM

In reply to this comment (#843006)
i believe the name is going to be "28 Weeks Later," as the title of this article implies. i don't think the first needed a sequel either, but i guess we'll have to wait and see how it turns out.

(Reply to this)

wakeofinsanity writes:
on Aug 25 2006 12:12 AM

It's got a good director in Fresnadillo, or I guess I just enjoyed Intacto. Renner has potential, and I'm glad that boyle and garland are both still involved... I really hope this doesn't suck.

(Reply to this)

TonyDHelms29624 writes:
on Aug 25 2006 09:24 PM

[b]kinda disappointed[/b]
Movies like this, where the ending could not be any clearer, don't need a sequel.

(Reply to this)

Jbourne37 writes:
on Aug 25 2006 11:36 PM

The ending left it open for a sequel. Main characters were saved, but there were still a lot of zombies that hadn't died. If they keep the style of the first film, this could be pretty good.

(Reply to this)

Irishbrwnie writes:
on Sep 28 2007 02:10 AM

In reply to this comment (#843010)
Over a year later I am posting that I loved this movie. I'm surprised so many people were assuming it'd suck. I like it a heck of a lot more than the first. The ending of the first annoyed me when it became about "I promised my men women..." and suddenly became based on the despicable crime of rape and zombies were forgotten for like 20 minutes. Jeremy Renner was awesome in the second, and despite what some people get out of it, I thought the soldiers were portrayed generally as good people. GENERALLY that's what our soldiers are and I'm so sick of conspiracies saying otherwise. You'll find bad apples anywhere there are large amounts of people. but you'll also find heroes and people who care. In this case, that type was portrayed by Jeremy Renner.

(Reply to this)

Related Links

Jeremy Renner

Related Articles

Most Discussed

Latest News

Latest Interviews

Latest Features

Sponsored Links