"Halo" Movie Frag Count Builds as Studios Back Out
The Peter Jackson-produced movie version of alien war game "Halo" has run into a spot of trouble, as co-financiers Universal and Fox have both withdrawn from the project.
The studios were set to foot the $135 million bill for the feature-film adaptation of Microsoft's popular Xbox game until earlier this week, when an initial payment was due.

The deal-breaking came after Fox and Universal tried a last-minute renegotiation with Microsoft and the filmmakers, attempting to get them to reduce their profit percentages. When Jackson, partner Fran Walsh, and the rest of the production team declined, the studios pulled out of the project.
Speaking to Variety, Jackon rep Ken Kamins explained, "What happened was this: Universal, on behalf of both studios, asked for a meeting with the filmmakers just prior to the due date of a significant payment. Basically, they said that in order to move forward with the film, the filmmakers had to significantly reduce their deals. They waited until the last minute to have this conversation. Peter and Fran, after speaking with their producing partners and with Microsoft and Bungee (the studio that designed the original game), respectfully declined."
Besides the filmmakers' percentages, other potential points of studio trepidation centered on the film's inexperienced director, Neill Blomkamp, and rumors that the $135 million budget could balloon to nearly $200 million.
Just last month, Jackson and Microsoft announced their plans to create a half-film, half-video game "Halo" experience for the Xbox in conjunction with the film's release.
Meanwhile, pre-production on the planned 2008 release continues at Jackson's Weta Digital and Weta Workshop visual effects shops, and Microsoft is shopping around for other distributors.
The studios were set to foot the $135 million bill for the feature-film adaptation of Microsoft's popular Xbox game until earlier this week, when an initial payment was due.

The deal-breaking came after Fox and Universal tried a last-minute renegotiation with Microsoft and the filmmakers, attempting to get them to reduce their profit percentages. When Jackson, partner Fran Walsh, and the rest of the production team declined, the studios pulled out of the project.
Speaking to Variety, Jackon rep Ken Kamins explained, "What happened was this: Universal, on behalf of both studios, asked for a meeting with the filmmakers just prior to the due date of a significant payment. Basically, they said that in order to move forward with the film, the filmmakers had to significantly reduce their deals. They waited until the last minute to have this conversation. Peter and Fran, after speaking with their producing partners and with Microsoft and Bungee (the studio that designed the original game), respectfully declined."
Besides the filmmakers' percentages, other potential points of studio trepidation centered on the film's inexperienced director, Neill Blomkamp, and rumors that the $135 million budget could balloon to nearly $200 million.
Just last month, Jackson and Microsoft announced their plans to create a half-film, half-video game "Halo" experience for the Xbox in conjunction with the film's release.
Meanwhile, pre-production on the planned 2008 release continues at Jackson's Weta Digital and Weta Workshop visual effects shops, and Microsoft is shopping around for other distributors.
Related Items
| Celeb: | Peter Jackson |
| Neill Blomkamp | |
| Fran Walsh | |
| Movie: | Halo |
|
blorenze writes: on Oct 20 2006 12:14 PM NOOOOOOOOOOO!!!! Geekdom cannot survive such a letdown. WE NEED THIS MOVIE! ...I really hope you picked up the sarcasm there... (Reply to this) |
|
Mainevent writes: on Oct 20 2006 12:56 PM The ridiculous thing is that, as far as movies are concerned, 200 million isn't that much anymore. Especially for a franchise with a base as large as Halo's; it'd most likely make that back in a month domestically. (Reply to this) |
|
Hamsack writes: on Oct 20 2006 01:41 PM I'm actually really dissapointed about this. Not because I'm a fan of the game (which I'm not), but because I was really happy about Blomkamp directing, seeing as how is a young, fellow South African ;P And I really wanted to see what he's capable of. Anyways, here's hoping they'll get someone else to finance the film (Reply to this) |
|
nogard64 writes: on Oct 20 2006 01:57 PM DUH! Seriously with how bad hollywood is doing they are way cautious now. And come on how many of you are seriously going to say "hey guys we all have to see Halo this weekend?" or "Hey sweety (your g/f) I really want to go see Halo" If you are comfortable with saying that out loud, then just make sure you wear clean suspenders and a new pocket protector when you go see the movie. (Reply to this) |
|
Merlin235 writes: on Oct 20 2006 02:47 PM You know, profit percentages are getting out of hand. It's making it difficult to finace movies anymore, especially big blockbusters. Imagine asking someone for up to $200 million, and you and your friend are going to take 45% of the profit. That's insane. Who in their right mind would take such a deal? Apparently Fox and Universal got wise and backed out. (Reply to this) |
|
Master King Sexington writes: on Oct 20 2006 03:11 PM In reply to this comment (#847042) You're dumb to think that the only people that play games and are comfortable admitting that they do are nerds. Pretty much everyone in the age 13-21 loves Halo. Guys and girls. All different types of people. Go castrate yourself so you don't reproduce. (Reply to this) |
|
vader_of_vjun writes: on Oct 20 2006 03:59 PM Meh. I don't see how a film adaptation of just another dumb shooter (albiet, a highly entertaining one) will make a great film. (Reply to this) |
|
rgallitan writes: on Oct 20 2006 07:00 PM Crap. Well.. I was also skeptical of the director, but $135 is a reasonable amount for a sci-fi story of that scale, and the two studios are splitting it anyway, and they already agreed to the contracts, so it's pretty lame to back away now. On the other hand, I never understood why they wanted studio backing anyway. All Fox and Universal were providing was the money, which is not something Microsoft is short on. Hell, that company is probably richer than all of Hollywood put together. Especially now that Jackson's production unit is already attached, and seems passionate about it, I say they just self-finance the picture. They'll get a better movie that way anyway, since they won't have to deal with meddling executives. Then they can shop for distributors at Sundance like all the other independants, and watch Fox and Universal come crawling back for a piece of the pie. (Reply to this) |
|
The Paki Don writes: on Oct 21 2006 01:46 AM Would you like a piece of pie? FRANKY, I think you should have a piece of pie! (Reply to this) |
|
Reel 2/Dialogue 2 writes: on Oct 21 2006 04:39 AM In reply to this comment (#847046) [b]Maybe I should actually play this game...[/b] Good point. That price would be only slightly larger than a drop in a bucket for MicroSoft, they could've done so and turn to the studios for distribution. I'm interested to know what the details of that backpoint plan were to make a couple bigshot studios to back off. (Reply to this) |
|
dagreenman18 writes: on Oct 21 2006 07:43 AM umm.... yeah IT'S FREAKING MICROSOFT AND PEATER JACKSON AND THEY ARE GONNA TELL ME THAT THEY CAN'T DISTRIBUTE THERE OWN GODDAMN MOVIE!!!!!!!! fuck you, i call bullshit. i think they just want the studio name for easier ticket sales, when in reality if you multiply the number of people who love Halo by the $10 ticket price, then i think that they are gonna make back double what you put in the movie, even if you actually make real living Covanant soldiers. which i bet microsoft is working on for the halo 3 promotions. (Reply to this) |
|
Future Genetics writes: on Oct 21 2006 08:48 AM In reply to this comment (#847040) 200 million is still a lot. King Kong Topped out at 185 or so. Not many projects, even today, reach that mark. And to assume that just because it's Halo it'll recoup it's costs in a month is insane considering all of the video game-movie flops there have been. (Reply to this) |
|
Matanuki writes: on Oct 21 2006 10:04 AM In reply to this comment (#847042) That's an unfair and grossly inadequate stereotype. (Reply to this) |
|
Matanuki writes: on Oct 21 2006 10:09 AM In reply to this comment (#847051) Considering the size of the Halo fan base and the people behind the production of this film, it's hardly insane to assume it'll make back the budget quickly. No matter what they do, I highly doubt we're gonna get a repeat of Resident Evil or Doom. (Reply to this) |
|
dylan21484nj writes: on Oct 21 2006 11:52 AM i have faith in Peter Jackson, but i'd have more faith if he were directing, not just producing. anyways, maybe New Line would be interested in distributing. (Reply to this) |
|
CartoonWorldVGM writes: on Oct 21 2006 03:34 PM [b]...[/b] Unless Jackson and Blomkamp really are trying as hard as they say they are into making a great adaptation, then this news will hit as a disappointment. Hollywood is no longer concerned about the quality of a film anymore. It's all about money and Universal and Fox are starting to worry that this will be a flop. I highly doubt this will flop if it's marketing and overall quality is done properly. Besides Silent Hill, then hasn't been one great video game adaptation. Let's hope Jackson and Blomkamp can change the views of how people see these types of films. (Reply to this) |
|
Matanuki writes: on Oct 21 2006 05:14 PM In reply to this comment (#847055) I hope they keep the song from the game. Imagine how awesome that would be for a trailer! The whole "aahhhhh ahhhhhhh......" lol. (Reply to this) |
|
CannibalPenguins writes: on Oct 21 2006 05:57 PM 2008 my ass. (Reply to this) |
|
South_park300 writes: on Oct 21 2006 08:00 PM i could really care less. the first game was alright. the second game was mediocre. no matter what video game it is, they rarely make awesome movies. (Reply to this) |
|
MOVIE FAN 101 writes: on Oct 21 2006 08:41 PM Cant say im not surprised by universal and fox's decision to withdraw from this project. In my opinion I always thought the budget was gonna be a problem. How can someone create a monster of a movie like this with a low budget? Its impossible. Now the big question is, is any other studio going to want to touch this one. I know i wouldn't (Reply to this) |
| You must be registered to post comments. Login or Register. |







