RottenTomatoes.com
Log In | Register | What is RT?
Check out the new RT Community
  • Home
  • Movies
  • DVD
  • Celebrities
  • News
  • Critics
  • Trailers & Pictures
  • CommunityBeta
  • Features
  • | Columns
  • | Guides
RT Search Powered by Google
help icon Enhanced RT
searches on Google
Click here to turn on enhanced search results from RT on your Google searches.
 
News
The Return of "Harold & Kumar"
by Scott Weinberg | October 30, 2006
Discuss Article
It's a sequel that's been (mildly) discussed for quite some time now, but it seems that New Line is ready to get rolling on the as-yet-untitled "Harold & Kumar 2." And yes, both lead actors will be returning -- a rarity in New Line sequels.

From ComingSoon.net & Production Weekly: "Production Weekly reports that the sequel to 2004's Harold & Kumar Go to White Castle is planned for a late January start date in Shreveport, Louisiana. John Cho and Kal Penn are set to reprise their roles as Harold and Kumar, respectively.

In Harold & Kumar 2, the cross-country adventure follows the pot-smoking duo as they try to outrun the authorities after being suspected as terrorists when they try to sneak a bong on board a flight to Amsterdam.

The screenplay is by Jon Hurwitz and Hayden Schlossberg, who wrote the first film's script and will co-direct the sequel."

Interesting trivia: In the UK, "Harold and Kumar Go to White Castle" is known as "Harold and Kumar Get the Munchies." (Cuz they don't have White Castle in England!)

Related Items
Celeb: John Cho
Kal Penn
Jonathan Hurwitz
Hayden Schlossberg
Movie: Harold & Kumar Go To White Castle
Bookmark and Share
Comments (1-15 of 15 posts) | Reply
nogard64
nogard64 writes:
on Oct 30 2006 11:17 AM

[b]hate to play the race card![/b]
but this movie would have been a huge smash if it was 2 white stoner dudes.
Very under rated movie, didnt do very well box office wise, happy to see a sequel.

according to American stereotypes its ok for asian poeple to fix your computers and help you with your math homework but no they never smoke weed or have fun or throw a party. yeah and its 2006? Are we sure about that?


(Reply to this)
elziard
elziard writes:
on Oct 30 2006 12:21 PM

yahh!!!
there was a lot of wit and much stoner humor in the first, also some clunking running gags, however there was also charm. and this has some potential to capture the first one's charm.


(Reply to this)
TheIceGhost
TheIceGhost writes:
on Oct 30 2006 12:35 PM

In reply to this comment (#847575)
I don't think race has anything to do with it, it just wasn't that good; although I do like the two main actors so, I'm happy they're still working, they both need to do more stuff....the plot for this sequel sounds dumb though, like the first one's.

(Reply to this)
donkeytron
donkeytron writes:
on Oct 30 2006 01:32 PM

[b]Great news![/b]
The original was probably one of the best surprises I ever got out of a rental. I was expecting nothing and what I got was an infintely watchable riot. It's one of those comfort movies you can watch anytime and it'll make you smile. Can't wait for the sequal. A Cheech & Chong for a new era whose characters are more than one-note stoner stereotypes. MEEKROB!!!


(Reply to this)
The_Corrector
The_Corrector writes:
on Oct 30 2006 01:33 PM

There was the same basic movie with two white stoners, it was called Dude, Where's my car?, and it sucked balls.

Leave the racism talk for your therapy sessions


(Reply to this)
victorkanghuang
victorkanghuang writes:
on Oct 30 2006 01:35 PM

In reply to this comment (#847577)
[b]wasn't... that good.... ?[/b]
nope you're wrong. it was pure hilarity from start to finish. but you're right, it doesn't have anything to do with race, not when it comes to attracting audiences. there was certainly plenty of race related humor which cracked everyone up. it's just a movie about two fellas going from point A to point B with wacky hijinks in between. simple. classic. utterly hilarious.

anyway if it were two white guys it'd been crap. so much of it only works the way it is. stop trying to ruin a wonderful comedy.


(Reply to this)
dagreenman18
dagreenman18 writes:
on Oct 30 2006 03:06 PM

hehehehehe sweet, loved the first one for the sheer insanity of it all and the compleate randomness of the situations, like riding a cheetah, or flying a hangglider, or rocking out to wilson philips, or pot induced animated dreams ( ah, bullets, my only weakness!). im totally phyced to see it, i can't wait. i just wish it was in amsterdam so i could be "Harold and Kumar go to Amsterdam"

(Reply to this)
hugz4thugz
hugz4thugz writes:
on Oct 30 2006 04:39 PM

On a scale of 1 - 10, 1 being not very extreme and 10 being extremely extreme, this ranks as a 9.5

(Reply to this)
Darby891
Darby891 writes:
on Oct 30 2006 08:35 PM

extreme cheddaaar eyaaaaaaaawoo!! the original was a classic. people who didn't like it must be sticklers cuz everyone i show this movie too can do nothing but quote it non-stop well after the movie ends

(Reply to this)
alsanali
alsanali writes:
on Oct 30 2006 08:56 PM

Harold and Kumar was hilarious, plus it had some decent social commentary as well a very clever plot. I'm definitely looking forward to this.

(Reply to this)
Mariannie
Mariannie writes:
on Oct 30 2006 10:16 PM

i really liked this movie to be honest. I'm glad they're making another one. I think I like the whole minority, funny typa thing goin on, with stereotypical references, an cliche actions that doesn't mock nething per se, it's just fn funny.
m
www.myspace.com/mariannieo


(Reply to this)
frogleg
frogleg writes:
on Oct 31 2006 07:34 AM

"Nice pubes."

(Reply to this)
mizzoucritic
mizzoucritic writes:
on Oct 31 2006 09:02 AM

I can't wait. The first one was one of the best stoner films ever made. Correction - the best stoner film ever made. I'll be there opening weekend on this one.

(Reply to this)
bigcfk
bigcfk writes:
on Oct 31 2006 01:37 PM

I've just become rather excited.

(Reply to this)
fizzypulp
fizzypulp writes:
on Nov 01 2006 09:26 AM

YYYYYAAAAAAAAYYYYYYYY
Waited ages to hear this and i am so happy.
The film is so funny - the cheetah bit was side splitting funny! And i think the fact that they werent white stoner dudes made it even funnier!


(Reply to this)
Read More Comments
Page | 1
Post Your Comment
You must be registered to post comments. Login or Register.

Related Links

John Cho
  • Pictures
  • News
  • Filmography
  • Forum

Related Articles

  • Box Office Guru Preview: Star Trek Opens Fire on Wolverine (22)
  • Four New Star Trek Posters Posted Opens in new window (19)
  • Box Office Guru Preview: Odd Couples Invade Multiplexes (11)
  • Star Trek XI Finds Its Scotty, Sulu (31)
  • Neil Patrick Harris Still Ladies Man in Harold and Kumar 2 (11)
  • "Harold & Kumar" Find a Whole Bunch of New Friends (8)
  • Sundance Reviews: Short and Sweet, A Review Roundup (0)
  • The Return of "Harold & Kumar" (15)
  • Harold and Kumar to Ride Again (6)

Most Discussed

  • Box Office Guru Wrapup: Avatar, Sherlock, and Alvin Team Up To Break Records (374)
  • Critics Choose Must-Sees and Worsts of 2009 (234)
  • RT Editors Choose Their Favorite Films of 2009! (139)
  • RT's Ten Most Popular Movies of 2009 (93)
  • Total Recall: New Year's Eve Movies (42)
  • RT on DVD & Blu-Ray: 9 and Paranormal Activity (31)
  • Critics Consensus: The White Ribbon Is Certified Fresh (23)
  • Five Favorites of the Five Favorite Films of 2009 (22)
  • Friday Harvest: Eclipse, Robin Hood, and more! (16)
  • Weekly Ketchup: Annual Ketchup Edition (16)

Latest News

  • Weekly Ketchup: Annual Ketchup Edition (16)
  • Friday Harvest: Eclipse, Robin Hood, and more! (16)
  • Five Favorites of the Five Favorite Films of 2009 (22)
  • Critics Consensus: The White Ribbon Is Certified Fresh (23)
  • RT's 2010 Movie Preview -- Happy New Year! (0)
  • RT's Ten Most Popular Movies of 2009 (93)
  • Total Recall: New Year's Eve Movies (42)
  • Critics Choose Must-Sees and Worsts of 2009 (234)
  • RT Editors Choose Their Favorite Films of 2009! (139)
  • What We're Watching on Blu-ray from 20th Century Fox! (3)

Latest Interviews

  • Five Favorite Films With Peter Jackson (74)
  • Robert Downey Jr. talks Sherlock Holmes & Iron Man 2 - RT Interview (22)
  • Director Ruben Fleischer Talks Zombieland (2)
  • "I Don't Hate Women": Lars von Trier on Antichrist (17)
  • Eric Bana talks Love the Beast - RT Interview (12)
  • Fight Club Sound Designer Reflects on Film's 10th Anniversary (24)
  • James Schamus talks Taking Woodstock - RT Interview (8)
  • John Hurt Talks Harry Potter, Quentin Crisp and Alien - The RT Interview (16)
  • Terry Gilliam Talks Doctor Parnassus (24)
  • Wes Anderson Talks Fantastic Mr. Fox - RT Interview (9)

Latest Features

  • RT's Best of the Decade! (190)
  • Five Favorite Films With Peter Jackson (74)
  • The Effects of Where the Wild Things Are (37)
  • The Gimmicks That Changed Cinema: Part 2 (8)
  • The Gimmicks That Changed Cinema: Part 1 (37)
  • Five Favorite Films With Avatar's Sam Worthington (61)
  • Exclusive: The World of Where the Wild Things Are (10)
  • Sundance 2010: RT's 10 Most Anticipated Movies (44)
  • 10 Horrifically Profitable Films (48)
  • Ban Them All! 10 Infamously Controversial Movies (108)

Sponsored Links

 
 
About| Site Map| Help| RT To Go| Contact Us| Critics Submission| Linking to RT| Licensing| Movie List| Games| Celebs List| Newsletter
IGN Logo
About Us | Advertise | Contact Us | Press | Careers
IGN | GameSpy | Comrade | Arena | FilePlanet | Direct2Drive | GameSpy Technology
TeamXbox | Game Sites | VE3D | CheatsCodesGuides | GameStats | GamerMetrics
AskMen.com | Rotten Tomatoes | GIGA.DE | What They Play | Battlefield Heroes
By continuing past this page, and by your continued use of this site, you agree to be bound by and abide by the User Agreement.
Copyright 1998-2010, IGN Entertainment, Inc. | Support | Privacy Policy | User Agreement | Subscribe to RT's XML feed! RSS Feeds
IGN’s enterprise databases running Oracle, SQL and MySQL are professionally monitored and managed by Pythian Remote DBA.
Certain product data ©1995-present Muze, Inc. For personal use only. All rights reserved.