ROTTEN TOMATOES: Inconvenienter: Al Gore Strikes Back!

Inconvenienter: Al Gore Strikes Back!

by Scott Weinberg | May 25, 2007

Curious to know how "An Inconvenient Truth" finishes? Guess you'll have to see the sequel.

According to IESB.net, "ACT" director Davis Guggenheim is about to meet with Paramount to talk about doing a follow-up to his award-winning global warming documentary.

"I’m meeting with Paramount next week to talk about a sequel to Inconvenient Truth. Too early to talk about details..." is what the filmmaker had to say from the "Gracie" press event. Our source makes the solid point that "An Inconvenient Truth" was produced in only five months, which means we could have a second film pretty quickly.

Source: IESB.net

Related Items

Celeb:	Davis Guggenheim
Movie:	An Inconvenient Truth
	Gracie

(1-20 of 150 posts) | Reply

Thundaar writes:
on May 25 2007 03:07 AM

Please. No more truth.

(Reply to this)

MrWhite5252 writes:
on May 25 2007 05:53 AM

Please. No more lies.

(Reply to this)

my2ndbase writes:
on May 25 2007 06:26 AM

Lies eh? ummmm... wow. congrats on not believing what scientists all agree on... except the ones funded by the Bush administration... but they don't count.

(Reply to this)

tankedsuperman writes:
on May 25 2007 06:41 AM

do your homework dumbass. it was all lies. how come scientists from all over the world are denying that we are the cause. take a geology class and study how old earth actually is genius. oh, and algore isn't even a scientist! he's a politician. and ps, science isn't based on consesus. what school did you go to.

(Reply to this)

Merlin235 writes:
on May 25 2007 07:25 AM

Alright, a Global Warming flame war. Where's my popcorn, I gotta watch this...... ;)

(Reply to this)

arendr writes:
on May 25 2007 07:38 AM

I guess he's not running for president then!

And to the guy who denies it: even if you don't believe in "global warming", don't you understand that CO2 emissions are bad for you anyway? I live in Los Angeles. The smog here is terrible. If we were to get off our dependence on oil, we would not only have an opportunity to clean the air, but also to stop getting in pointless middle eastern conflicts, and spark our economy with our own local energy plants instead of relying on overseas nations.

And yes, it's a Global Warming flame war.

(Reply to this)

crudebob writes:
on May 25 2007 08:00 AM

In reply to this comment (#866824)
Spoken like a true 'Amurican'. Party on dude.

(Reply to this)

Now it's dark writes:
on May 25 2007 08:00 AM

Saddam is responsible for global warming.

(Reply to this)

welease_woger writes:
on May 25 2007 08:13 AM

In reply to this comment (#866824)
Stwike him, Centuwion, vewy woughly!

(Reply to this)

medicineman writes:
on May 25 2007 08:17 AM

In reply to this comment (#866828)
That must have been the weapon of mass destruction Bush said he had! Time to invade Iraq and hang that infidel!

(Reply to this)

Cindy_Lou_Who writes:
on May 25 2007 08:31 AM

In reply to this comment (#866824)
Earth calling tankedsuperman; What planet do you live on? Cause it's certainly not this one. You must be living on the same planet that crazy old George lives on. Time for you to take you head out of George's backside and face reality.

(Reply to this)

zeromark16 writes:
on May 25 2007 08:32 AM

In reply to this comment (#866830)
Oh, wait...

You did that already.

(Reply to this)

Now it's dark writes:
on May 25 2007 08:46 AM

In reply to this comment (#866832)
Global warming's over!! The polar bears owe the Decider big time.

(Reply to this)

copperlion writes:
on May 25 2007 08:51 AM

In reply to this comment (#866826)
If it wasn't for CO2 we wouldn't be alive...CO2 is a relatively minor percentage of the mix, that when greens start screaming that man is contributing 49% of the CO2...it's actually 49% of about .032...I like getting my environmental info from the man that invented the internet, though...

(Reply to this)

tankedsuperman writes:
on May 25 2007 09:03 AM

wow, cindy lou. you must not have gone to school either. i don't like george thank you very much but you need to seriously research before you open your mouth. i will gladly debate anyone on here outside of this website because this is for movies not politics. and p.s people, we have only been studying earth's ozone layer and atmosphere since 1952. get a clue people!! the earth is 4.6 billion years old!! i seriously doubt our little .000001 percent of exsistence on this planet has had a serious affect. god bless, go read a geology book.

(Reply to this)

tankedsuperman writes:
on May 25 2007 09:04 AM

so...how about that new joker photo. looks darn good to me.

(Reply to this)

Crenshaw writes:
on May 25 2007 09:10 AM

Gotta love those crazy 30 percenters.

(Reply to this)

arendr writes:
on May 25 2007 09:11 AM

In reply to this comment (#866835)
"i will gladly debate anyone on here outside of this website because this is for movies not politics."

funny how you started the political debate.

"i seriously doubt our little .000001 percent of exsistence on this planet has had a serious affect."

why don't you take a look at how many times earth's population has increased since your precious statistical year of 1952. Here's a link: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_population

If you research the small tribal societies of our ancestors, you will see that their ecological footprint was left. There is a myth that indiginous societies were kinder to the earth. They all left some kind of environmental impact. Now, imagine what happens when you increase the number of people living in a single area. What do you get? More resources used, and a greater impact on the environment.

It's just like when a certain species of animal overpopulates an area. They start to harm the ecosystem instead of support it, as they did before.

I just provided you will a logical viewpoint. Don't tell me to simply read a geology book, because it's a terrible argument.

(Reply to this)

tankedsuperman writes:
on May 25 2007 09:17 AM

are you serious!? you are getting your info from wikipedia! hahahahaha!!! you might as well go ask a 3rd grader!! thanks for the laugh!!

(Reply to this)

The_Corrector writes:
on May 25 2007 09:18 AM

I completely agree!!!!...that joker photo did look pretty sweet.

(Reply to this)