Warcraft Movie Coming in 2009
Summary
Get your level 60 Blood Elf Paladins ready; World of Warcraft, the biggest MMO vid game known to man, is finally coming to theaters. Back to Article
Get your level 60 Blood Elf Paladins ready; World of Warcraft, the biggest MMO vid game known to man, is finally coming to theaters. Back to Article
|
Legalos245 writes: on Aug 05 2007 05:45 PM Sounds pretty neat. (Reply to this) |
|
missnman writes: on Aug 05 2007 06:00 PM Seems like they are preparing for it well, but who knows how this will turn out. (Reply to this) |
|
Chadowe writes: on Aug 05 2007 06:07 PM Oh brother... Two of the most iron clad rules of entertainment are: 1. Movies based on games suck. 2. Games based on movies suck even more. I'll be very VERY sceptical as both a movie fan, and a former WoW addict. (Reply to this) |
|
UselessRob writes: on Aug 05 2007 06:48 PM More proof that Hollywood is out of ideas. They're just ripping apart anything that will make money, without any real creative thought. It'll suck, and it'll be the biggest movie of the year. Lame. (Reply to this) |
|
PlanBFromOuterSpace writes: on Aug 05 2007 06:50 PM I think the bigger question is whether or not you can peel the diehard fans away from their computers for the 2 hours that it's going to take to watch the movie. I've known people that have lost jobs and skipped friends' weddings and other special occasions because of that damn game. I also know people that look EXACTLY like the guy in the South Park episode. Creepy. (Reply to this) |
|
JesusofSuburbia writes: on Aug 05 2007 07:01 PM I hope this bombs, it sounds awful. They know it's going to suck, and they think a big name director is going to solve this disaster of a movie idea. (Reply to this) |
|
Gareth writes: on Aug 05 2007 07:24 PM More Details htt (Reply to this) |
|
Darkness My Old Friend writes: on Aug 05 2007 07:36 PM This... is a terrible idea. I'm not saying that because it's a video game movie and I'm making some kind of reactionary judgment. I actually think a more than decent animated series could be made based on much of the Warcraft lore. For a movie however... what will it be, a series of 90 second vignettes of fan service for each WOW fan's favorite fill-in-the-blank? Just an endless chain of I mean, who needs that? There's no way that they could avoid biting off more than they could possibly chew in making this film. There's just no way. And on a slightly different topic... how bizarre is a person with a level 60 blood elf paladin? That's seriously what the article is being led off with? A post TBC character at the pre-TBC level cap? What is that, just a couple of untargeted wow references tossed out off the cuff? Might as well just say "big news for you hep cats with your hip hop and your pac-man video game mtv big mac time!" Especially since for 2009 saying "get your level 80 Death Knights ready". I mean... it's a question of relevance, no? (Reply to this) |
|
Darkness My Old Friend writes: on Aug 05 2007 07:39 PM I totally lost a "would make much more sense" around the end there. (Reply to this) |
|
ManofStee1 writes: on Aug 05 2007 07:42 PM I play WoW currently and I don't see a problem with the Warcraft series becoming a movie. Sure it'll end up being a colorful LOTR rip-off but it might still be worth seeing. (Reply to this) |
|
Scarborough Fair writes: on Aug 05 2007 08:08 PM Well here's a bag of horse**** for us all to choke down. I wonder why this needs to happen. Really. This is just pointless. So you want to make a movie about elves and knights and goblins all getting ready to go to war with each other? Fine. If that's a movie you want to make, make it. But why bother calling it 'world of warcraft'? The only point is name recognition. This movie will barely resemble that game. (Reply to this) |
|
Jen Yamato writes: on Aug 05 2007 08:22 PM Yeah, I pretty much chose that example to see who of our readers would know that the highest level isn't 60 anymore and that blood elves could be paladins with the first expansion pack. I guess that reader is you. Congrats. (Reply to this) |
|
CoUcH ToMaToE DoUgIe writes: on Aug 05 2007 08:51 PM hey, if south park can create a legendary episode out of it then, i'm okay with a big movie about it. still, big ups for matt and trey for being the first to pick up on this apparent phenomomen that i still don't get. but when i think of this movie's future aspects, i think the great eric theodore cartman said it best,"your about to get poned!" of, it would help to know what the word "poned" means but hey if Stan's Dad goes "Awww, My Gawd" about something then it usually means it something to respect & good. (Reply to this) |
|
Darkness My Old Friend writes: on Aug 05 2007 08:57 PM "I ate the dork bait at rottentomatoes and all I got was this stupid post out in the ether." (Reply to this) |
|
Chim writes: on Aug 05 2007 09:48 PM "As for a director, Tull (who executive-produced 300 and Superman Returns) said they're looking for someone along the lines of a Zack Snyder or a Chris Nolan, both of whom have had recent hits (300 and Batman Begins, respectively) produced by Legendary Pictures." In other words they have no idea. (Reply to this) |
|
bob rulz writes: on Aug 05 2007 10:00 PM I think it could be good. Batman Begins and 300 were both awesome movies. As much as I hate the idea of a Warcraft movie, don't write it off just because it's uninspired and unoriginal. (Reply to this) |
|
bob rulz writes: on Aug 05 2007 10:01 PM In reply to this comment (#1014488) Except that it'll have all of the races and lots of places from that game, and it will follow the storyline, etc etc etc. (Reply to this) |
|
Jen Yamato writes: on Aug 05 2007 10:30 PM :) I so seldom have any dork bait to lay around here. Forgive me. Friends, Darkness? (Reply to this) |
|
koktengri writes: on Aug 05 2007 11:05 PM that will be interesting.i want to see arthas.but not played by orlando bloom i hope (Reply to this) |
|
killermonkey8822 writes: on Aug 05 2007 11:58 PM world of warcraft is one of the biggest waists of money this world has ever known...... and this movie isn't going to work out.... i just know that it's not going to. (Reply to this) |
|
Product_of_You writes: on Aug 06 2007 04:30 AM blah 300 (Reply to this) |
|
Exode writes: on Aug 06 2007 05:55 AM The logic "300 was awesome so we want our movie to be like that" doesn't present any confidence that this will be well made, especially after calling 300 legendary. (Reply to this) |
|
darkringer writes: on Aug 06 2007 08:21 AM I am gonna say it will be a people movie and not a critic movie. I cant think of one single all out war movie that the critics have enjoyed. 300 is like the closest thing and that bearly was fresh. but hey! I think it sounds utterly fantastic! (Reply to this) |
|
bobdebicker writes: on Aug 06 2007 10:18 AM can we please get a legend of zelda movie? (Reply to this) |
|
DarthWonka writes: on Aug 06 2007 10:32 AM In reply to this comment (#1014376) Heh? (Reply to this) |
|
DarthWonka writes: on Aug 06 2007 10:36 AM In reply to this comment (#1015212) Legendary was the name of the company that made 300 with Warner Bros. So yeah 300 was a "Legendary" Picture. (Reply to this) |
|
DarthWonka writes: on Aug 06 2007 10:37 AM In reply to this comment (#1015672) Yes. A fully developed three-installment adaptation of "Ocarina of Time." (Reply to this) |
|
DarthWonka writes: on Aug 06 2007 10:40 AM Ooh! Ooh! With the first film devoted to young Link, the second to Older Link and the first three temples, and the final film with Older Link and the final temples and his ultimate showdown with Ganon. Mmmmmmm. Tastes good. (Reply to this) |
|
Ashron writes: on Aug 06 2007 01:02 PM I swear to God you people are some of the most negative, depressing people around. Talk about lack of creativity. Anytime a movie about some treasured thing is announced, everybody rushes in to denounce it and talk about how much it's going to suck. This movie doesn't even have a script or director yet and already to many of you it's the wost thing ever made. I seem to recall a similar reaction to Transformers. Geez, at least wait until there's a trailer that you can tear apart before you take out your knives. With Blizzard involved, I have confidence. I haven't played any Warcraft title since the first one, way back in the day, but I know it had a pretty involved world and I think it could make a decent movie, given the right treatment. Sorry for the rant. It's been a bad day. (Reply to this) |
|
PlanBFromOuterSpace writes: on Aug 06 2007 02:07 PM In reply to this comment (#1016035) Well, if this is anything like the long-awaited Halo movie....oh wait, there's been no progress with THAT beloved property either, despite actual names behind the camera attached to it. And you wonder why people have so little faith in WoW? "This movie doesn't even have a script or director yet and already to many of you it's the wost thing ever made." It's BECAUSE there's no script or anything significant that's been done about it that people aren't taking a possible film version seriously yet. You want to talk about a lack of creativity? Saying "Yeah, we'd like to make a movie, and we have some good ideas" and dropping some random geek-friendly names, but having nothing to show for it , means nothing. We're not giving anyone credit, because honestly, there IS no reason to get excited about it yet. (Reply to this) |
|
Alexaion writes: on Aug 06 2007 04:46 PM Hmmm... the problem I see with this is (and this is my personal opinion), that story and character and entirely the world of Warcraft in generally isn't too great. The game itself is incredibly well made (I'm speaking here of WCIII... not having played WOW I'm not qualified to comment on that, but I can assume that Blizzard did an equally admirable job on the presentation), and is quite a bit of fun to play. As a game, it gets top marks. However, as a story and world I've always had a great deal of antipathy towards it. This can be ignored when enjoying a game, but might be more difficult to overlook in a movie, where in fact such things come to the fore. The problem with it has always been that the writers don't seem to me to be very good. They adapted Tolkien (like so many others), but only in so far as surface appearances went, and in the end provided only a shallow echo of the earlier fantasy works from which it has sprung. Part of the reason for this is simply because it IS a second generation fantasy story, as I'd call it. Writers like Tolkien looked directly to the old myths, the 'first' fantasy stories, for the basis, and only looked to other writers for inspiration. Not only this, but they were often well versed in fields like Classics, Linguistics, and the like. The writers who have written things like Warcraft are, more often than not, little beyond what we'd call fanboys, and do not seem to have any understanding of the art and literature behind it, and relegate themselves to adapting things upon the surface. You've lost the philosophy, the theology (relegated to trite 'the light' vs darkness sort of things), and most of the depth. What these are are not literature writers, but story writers, and the stories have been borrowed off of others. I would not be too aggrieved if I saw an advance in the art from one to the next (like the ancient Tragedians did to the Epics of Homer), but they have done nothing that has improved upon what came before, but only given us a hollow mishmash that serves well for the mood and setting of a game, but would be difficult to make for a proper movie. I once read the WCIII universe origin story in the WCIII manual, and I think it has forever shown to me an example of what is so very wrong with it all. It is, in outline, copied right out of the pages of Tolkien's Silmarillion, only with what made Tolkien's work actually meaningful removed. Now, I have not problem with borrowing and adaption: that is what makes art move. But it's sad to see things degenerate. And before anyone tells me that, if I am to say this, I should write something better myself, firstly I'll say that it doesn't require someone able to write better to be critical of things such as this. And secondly, I do attempt it, and complain for the cause that the sorts of things I see and complain about in this are the very things that I myself did some time ago, but feel I have moved past. (Reply to this) |
|
sickofitall writes: on Aug 06 2007 04:49 PM In reply to this comment (#1014242) you suck (Reply to this) |
|
Darkness My Old Friend writes: on Aug 06 2007 05:51 PM In reply to this comment (#1014784) You can be my wingman anytime, Jen. After reading some more of the Blizzard rep's statements on this project I've become more optimistic, giving it around a 10% chance of being decent. They will have to fight even harder than Bungie is with the Halo project however, and it'll be a hell of a road for them. If they can pull together a proper story to focus on and not bow to fan pressure to make Snakes on an Azeroth then they might have half a shot. (Reply to this) |
|
Ashron writes: on Aug 06 2007 06:06 PM In reply to this comment (#1016300) I don't mind anybody not getting excited yet; I'm not excited yet. I just don't understand the "it's gonna suck" mentality. As for Halo, getting any movie off the ground is a chore. When you start bringing the companies involved with this particular property, I imagine it's a little like trying to turn the Titanic. I'm also not excited about Halo yet, but I'm willing to give them the benefit of the doubt that they'll try to make a good movie. Now Alexaion has a little meat behind his basis for concern, but I don't know that the mythology for this particular type of film has to be all that deep. Take a couple of armies, throw in some interesting heroes/villians, and whip out some awesome fight scenes, and you've got a servicable summer movie. We can leave the literature to the books. These are just my thoughts. I could be wrong. (Reply to this) |
|
Paul_Is_Drunk writes: on Aug 06 2007 07:02 PM I'm taking a risk here, but... still too early to tell? Yeah, I'll go with that. Could be pretty cool if they do it right. Just make it a small, contained movie with some new relevance to the Warcraft mythos, and you have yourself a hit. I just wonder what kind of cinematography they're going to use. Too close to 300 or Sin City could be cheasy, but anything along the lines of LoTR is going to be equally cheasy. They must tred carefully. Ah, screw it. FAN BOYS, ATTACK!!!!!!! (Reply to this) |
|
zgberg writes: on Aug 06 2007 07:22 PM This should be interesting. Big fan of the game...however, as one mentions above, video game movies tend to suck. Spending a 100 mil on this flick? It has to look cool with that budget. Films really depend on chemistry between the actors, director and everyone involved. If it has that, and appeals to outside the hardcore pc gamer crowd, it has a chance. If it relies to heavy on lore and too violent ( I want violence!, but can't be R...), it might not rake in what they need to re-coup the investment. (Reply to this) |
|
RawIsRamsey writes: on Aug 06 2007 07:48 PM OK, if the studio is willing to drop at least $100 mil on this flick, they obviously want it to succeed. Hopefully they'll be working closely with Blizzard to craft a story worthy of the series (they've destroyed enough lore in WoW....might as well just make a whole new story for the movie). Top-notch effects, a star or two, and a good director/producer should be on board for the amount of money involved... ...then again, this could end up as another Pluto Nash... (Reply to this) |
|
kfarschman writes: on Aug 06 2007 08:17 PM Ashron I think you nailed why people are skeptical about movies like this anymore when you said that this movie doesn't even have a script yet. Studios are just plucking random money making things in other mediums and then thinking, "hey, let's also make money off this thing", regardless if it would work in the film medium or not. Not like they cared if it did as long as it sold. It used to be a movie's genesis came from a great script than they decided to go into production for it. Not, "oh, what's an already popular thing, or was a popular thing that we can exploit and make a awful to lukewarm blockbuster? Oh how about Blahblahblah? Let's buy the rights to Blahblahblah and haphazardly throw a script together and make Blahblahblah: the movie and shove it down the fans of the source materials throat!". I don't play online games and don't know alot about Wow, but the old Warcraft RTS games were fun, but not because of the story. They served their purpose as a fun, if slightly cartoony collection of fantasy cliches in RTS form. Possibly a groundbreaking game, but nothing even remotely groundbreaking in the characters, story, or fantasy elements....medieval like time, elf, goblin, yawn, Nordic name here and there, magic spell, dark and light, the sword or crystal of something, blah. Seriously, wake me when New Line pulls their head out of their *** and gives Peter Jackson they stole from him and make "The Hobbit". (Reply to this) |
|
kfarschman writes: on Aug 06 2007 08:20 PM Since their is no edit, please imagine the words "the money" after "Peter Jackson" in my above post. (Reply to this) |
|
bobdebicker writes: on Aug 06 2007 08:39 PM In reply to this comment (#1015711) that sounds delicious darkwonka (Reply to this) |
|
yodas gooch writes: on Aug 06 2007 09:41 PM Lamest. Idea. Ever. EVER!!!! (Reply to this) |
|
SticksandStones writes: on Aug 06 2007 10:12 PM My only gripes with this film is the writing and the perspective. Having a mostly Alliance perspective is a weak cop out and clearly only done to cater more to the viewing audience, seeing as Alliance is more aesthetically appealing to people than the Horde. As for the writing, I believe that is what will make or break this film. And unfortunately, I wouldn't be surprised to find out that the writing is poor. Still, I have some optimism for this film, and I also don't see the justification for so aptly damning the film. (Reply to this) |
|
kfarschman writes: on Aug 07 2007 01:45 AM I know where people are coming from with the whole giving it a chance thing and all. It's just it seems in today's movie industry something like Star Wars would never be made. It didn't have inherent pop culture interest and no immediate cross media appeal and not having a readymade fanbase from another medium. Just bothersome. Original ideas are faulted because they aren't already actively making money and having a fanbase in a different medium and they are ignored by Hollywood. It's one of the reasons that the business side of film sometimes really bothers me. Also, movies wouldn't cost so much if there was less cgi. I rarely like cgi. I don't understand why people are fooled by it because I always notice it when used. I don't know why they gave up on the cheaper more realistic practical effects. I understand maybe touch up cgi or if something is completely impossible to do, but it seems like they don't even think of trying things practical anymore and go straight for expensive, crappy, cgi. My hate of cgi is what made Terminator 3 so enjoyable to me. There was tons of badass practical stunts and effects in that movie and was the single reason I liked it. Jurassic Park had some of the only realistic cgi, but that's because they spent tons of money and time on it and it was mixed with animatronics, puppets, and other practical effect techniques. Why do people think that just pure cgi is acceptable. It sucks. (Reply to this) |
|
deneco4 writes: on Aug 07 2007 10:31 AM My power is absolute! (Reply to this) |
|
southwick writes: on Aug 07 2007 01:11 PM In reply to this comment (#1017648) "I know where people are coming from with the whole giving it a chance thing and all. It's just it seems in today's movie industry something like Star Wars would never be made. It didn't have inherent pop culture interest and no immediate cross media appeal and not having a readymade fanbase from another medium. Just bothersome. Original ideas are faulted because they aren't already actively making money and having a fanbase in a different medium and they are ignored by Hollywood. It's one of the reasons that the business side of film sometimes really bothers me." -It was called Firefly (movie Serenity) and it came out a few years ago. -It was also better than StarWars imo. (Reply to this) |
|
dopeheathen writes: on Aug 09 2007 12:32 AM It's gonna suck, better accept it now so you wont be saddened the day it drops. I'm not a WoW player or a fan but due to the internet vids like Leeeeeeeeeroy Jenkins and spoofs on Southpark, I'm fairly interested in seeing it. But I still know it's gonna suck. (Reply to this) |
|
Huntressmoon13 writes: on Aug 09 2007 03:34 PM In reply to this comment (#1014218) Hey Chadowe, I thought "Goldeneye" the video game was cool :) But I agree with pretty much you are saying on the Game-to-Movie ideas: The original "Mortal Combat" was ok (it helped that it was pretty toungue-in-cheek), "Resident Evil" and "Tomb Raider" series have been eh, "Silent Hill" licked @ss, I won't even comment on "Super Mario Bros." and "Street Fighter," and I'm just as worried about "Diablo" as "WoW" right now. Still, if it could be pulled off, I'm willing to have a go...Love to see if anyone would ever touch "Vampire Masquerade: Bloodlines." (Reply to this) |
|
romsy writes: on Aug 12 2007 04:36 AM In reply to this comment (#1014550) you're kidding right? that whole south park episode was making fun of it not praising it, and its "pwned", from "pwn" a common typo of own, not "poned", you have no idea what you are talking about. as for the movie? its going to be a LOTR re-hash and its going to make money from people that have no idea what it is, because unless you can get Wi-Fi in the theater the addicts are not going to be seeing it, raiding molten core is more important. (Reply to this) |
|
High School With Money writes: on Aug 12 2007 05:14 AM [i]Less of an adventure party quest-type situation. More of an armies building to an inevitable conclusion type situation."[/i] Strange. [i]Lord of the Rings[/i] had BOTH. How is this different from it, again? Maybe there will be noobs and griefers and player killers (oh my) abound. It needs the verisimilitude of major server lag that [u]makes[/u] the game. All the characters will speak l33t. And they'll be composed of goofy looking, also ran anime designs. The one in the photo looks like something Rob Liefeld threw up. All that's needed is the subtle, gentle touch of a music video director... But even if this is successful, all it will end up being is a "ALL GAYMR MOOVEES IS TEH SUXXORX XCEPT WAR OF WORLDCRAFT LOLOMGDND!!!" footnote. Here's hoping... (Reply to this) |
|
Redwulf writes: on Sep 07 2007 12:19 AM I have some faith in this movie despite the reputation put on video game movies for one reason: (as far as I can see) blizzard has never throughout its history as a company ever published anything that has fallen short of exreamely high quality content. I personally have played and enjoyed warcraft II, III, WoW, Starcraft (though only briefly), and diablo II. Though they have only worked in the video game world and never have ventured into the movie world, I think that if the movie begins to look like a Piece of crap they will cancel it (They did just that to the game Warcraft Adventures: Lord of the clans which had a fanbase and potential cashcow status.) I don't think that blizzard would ruin that reputation on their first product in Hollywood. You can call me crazy but I think it may actually be a great movie...... (Reply to this) |
|
Arannor writes: on Dec 10 2007 09:40 AM I think that the movie should stay in Blizzard. Moving to an actual movie production company like legendary is a bad idea, knowing how badly storylines can get skewed. Live-Action is also a mistake. Blizzard has so much potential to make their own movie using the same cinematic material as they do for the WoW intro cinematics. I remember the first time I saw the intro cinematic for WoW and i was totally blown away, and I still enjoy watching it. I'm sure other people feel the same way. (Reply to this) |
|
bigymac writes: on Dec 22 2007 06:07 AM Live-Action = b-b-b-B-BULL****!!! after all these years of dreaming for a warcraft movie and they are alrdy gonna *** it up. i know for a fact that every other warcraft fan wished for them to make a movie, but for it to be in the same style as the cinematics they had put into wc3 RoC/TfT aswell as the trailers for WoW/TBC... wtf is this real ppl **** if u dont understand 1) ur a dum **** 2) go dl and watch the cinematic trailer for World of Warcraft (original or TBC) now tell me does that not look real... and fuken awesome. the world matches the characters in it. if all of it is animated there will be NO MISTAKE! it will be every bit as awesome as every1 expects it to be. ppl actually applauding the idea of a live-action style, complete retards. if they do that then it will, as ppl have commented on many sites a **** house movie (Reply to this) |
|
Lorialis writes: on Jan 22 2008 04:28 PM Really, I think the people who are posting on this site seem to think this is just going to be about the whole MMORPG stand point with just a bunch of random crap. Which it won't be, I quote from an unofficial, yet seemingly reliable resource "The plot for the film will take place approximately a year before the start of World of Warcraft, including races you have played and lands you have wandered in, where lots of plot arcs are melded into a two and a half hour story" In other words, you have to be familiar with pure Warcraft lore to know what exactly this movie will be about. It will mainly be based off of the books, I'm sure, but will have visuals that will be similar to that of the game. It will lead up to why these factions are at war in the first place, and will inspire players of the game to get more of a feel for it. (Reply to this) |
|
De4no writes: on Apr 10 2008 08:25 AM Personally I am extremely excited about this movie. Many of you out there with your negative comments have never even played a Warcraft game, read any of the stories or lore or understand it in the slightest. One of my favourite aspects of the Warcraft games, funnily enough, is the short ingame films they have. They look spectacular and often send chills up my spine when I view one for the first time, which I cannot say for many things I view. Call it a LOTR rip off all you like, if they approach this correctly it WILL be a very good movie which they are aiming to be accessible to anyone, not just warcraft fans like myself. (Reply to this) |
|
jumpinsnakes writes: on May 01 2008 09:53 AM With out a doubt it should be the same as the CGI they use for the Intro movies. That is the only way they can truly capture the fantasy world of Warcraft. Trying to create realistic magical effects and such will just all short. Not to mention there is some great voice talent and they could just have a star studded cast voice it and you wouldnt have to see their face so it wouldnt ruin your already developed perception of main characters. (Reply to this) |
|
randy m. writes: on Nov 02 2008 09:23 PM it doesnt seem like to bad of an idea, but i think it should be animated, like a beowolf kind of deal, so much more you could do with it, and i just dont think that the actors could pull it off. i cant see it happening =/ (Reply to this) |
|
Caleb K. writes: on Apr 03 2009 08:20 AM The fact that the company Blizzard has never turned out a bomb leads me to be hopeful for this movie. I played WC3 and read into the lore a little; my conclusion is that these guys know how to write a story. If they get a good director (like Nolan), get someone capable of turning the story into a screen play, and actually give the movie the 100 mil budget it is going to be awesome. In short, it could easily be screwed up. But, if they do everything right it could be epic. (Reply to this) |
|
Albert M. writes: on May 07 2009 03:28 PM So many of you are retarded. Since when does a movie need to be good to be a good idea? Nearly 11 million people play World of Warcraft, millions of them will want to see this movie and most likely enjoy it even if it's sh^t. Blizzard are NOT out of their league, they are brilliant. And FYI, knowing how much effort Blizzard puts into their games, this movie will most likely be nothing short of awesome anyway. (Reply to this) |
| You must be registered to post comments. Login or Register. |
Related Articles
Most Discussed
- Box Office Guru Wrapup: New Moon Shatters Records (176)
- Critics Consensus: New Moon Wanes (130)
- Total Recall: John Travolta's Best Movies (76)
- Total Recall: Star-Crossed Lovers (75)
- Weekly Ketchup: Idris Elba cast in Thor, more Spider-Man 4 rumors (59)
- Critics Consensus: Flee From Ninja Assassin (37)
- Friday Harvest: New Moon, Avatar, and more! (32)
- WB offers DVD to Blu-ray Trade-In Program (26)
- RT on DVD & Blu-Ray: Angels & Demons, Funny People, and Superman (18)
- Five Favorite Films With Zombieland Director Ruben Fleischer (18)
Latest News
- Five Favorite Films With Zombieland Director Ruben Fleischer (18)
- WB offers DVD to Blu-ray Trade-In Program (26)
- RT's Blu-ray Picks from WB (15)
- Critics Consensus: Flee From Ninja Assassin (37)
- RT's Disney Animation Celebration --- A Walk Through The Magic Kingdom! (0)
- "I Don't Hate Women": Lars von Trier on Antichrist (13)
- Total Recall: John Travolta's Best Movies (76)
- RT on DVD & Blu-Ray: Angels & Demons, Funny People, and Superman (18)
- Box Office Guru Wrapup: New Moon Shatters Records (176)
- Weekly Ketchup: Idris Elba cast in Thor, more Spider-Man 4 rumors (59)
Latest Interviews
- "I Don't Hate Women": Lars von Trier on Antichrist (13)
- Eric Bana talks Love the Beast - RT Interview (9)
- Fight Club Sound Designer Reflects on Film's 10th Anniversary (19)
- James Schamus talks Taking Woodstock - RT Interview (6)
- John Hurt Talks Harry Potter, Quentin Crisp and Alien - The RT Interview (15)
- Terry Gilliam Talks Doctor Parnassus (20)
- Wes Anderson Talks Fantastic Mr. Fox - RT Interview (8)
- Wolverine Creator Len Wein Talks About the Film (28)
- Gavin Hood Talks Wolverine; Possible Sequel (28)
- Duncan Jones talks Moon, Sam Rockwell, and Mute (14)
Latest Features
- Five Favorite Films With Zombieland Director Ruben Fleischer (18)
- "I Don't Hate Women": Lars von Trier on Antichrist (13)
- Fight Club Sound Designer Reflects on Film's 10th Anniversary (19)
- Five Favourite Films with Ang Lee (34)
- 10 Movies That Changed The (End Of The) World (33)
- Ho-ho-horror! 10 Scary Christmas Movies (39)
- 12 Facts About 2012 (135)
- Terry Gilliam Talks Doctor Parnassus (20)
- Five Favourite Films with 24's Carlos Bernard (33)
- Six Horrible Part Sixes (32)















