Meet a Critic: Roger Ebert!
RT chats with America's favorite critic.
Wishing him a speedy recovery from his surgery, we're re-posting our Meet a Critic chat with Roger Ebert -- Pulitzer Prize-winning author, screenwriter, and America's most recognizable (and beloved) film critic.
To paraphrase Roger Ebert himself, "I cannot speak, but I can write." Although cancer silenced the nation's best-loved film critic last year, Ebert (ranked by Forbes as the number one pundit in America) recently returned to the movies with a vengeance, publishing to his website an output of new reviews and Answer Man columns that puts entire fully-staffed newsrooms to shame. The qualities that made Ebert a critical celebrity for decades -- his wonderfully dry wit, deft writing, and a yearning to be moved by cinema -- of course remain intact, but while he's currently aided by a speaking computer, he shares with RT his hope that he'll soon recover his own voice.
There are many reasons why Ebert is the heart of the critical community, and in the hearts of the moviegoing public. His influential review show, begun on public access television in 1975 with fellow critic Gene Siskel as Opening Soon at a Theater Near You, blazed a path for the celebrity critic by merging serious film analysis with America's penchant for spectatorship. Ebert's reverence for great films (and irreverence for bad ones) gave birth to the coinage of terms like "Dead Teenager Movie" and the idea of an "evil" zero-star film (see: Deuce Bigalow: European Gigolo). And as many know, everyone's favorite critic penned a handful of delightfully camp B-movies with pal Russ Meyer: Beyond the Valley of the Dolls (1970), Up! (1976), and Beneath the Valley of the Ultra-Vixens (1979).
Catch up with Roger Ebert in our interview below, and look for two of his forthcoming books (Roger Ebert's Four-Star Reviews 1967-2007 due January from Andrews & McNeel, and a book on Martin Scorsese from the University of Chicago Press in the autumn).
Name: Roger Ebert
Age: 65
Hometown: Chicago
Years reviewing film: 40
How are you these days? (We all miss seeing you on the show and at festivals!)
Roger Ebert: I am cancer-free, and looking forward to what I hope will be a final surgery in late January, in which I may regain the ability to speak. I attended the Toronto Film Festival and plan to be back at my own Ebertfest in April and Cannes in May.
We hear you've been using a computerized British voice named Lawrence to speak...
RE: Nope, I've got an American accent now. It came with the new Leopard OS for my Mac.
Diving in: Why and how did you become a critic?
RE: I wrote a weekly column for The Daily Illini at Illinois which sometimes involved movies, and did some interviews and think pieces for the Sun-Times before being named to fill the vacancy in April 1967.
Before reviewing film you were a sports writer. How did that transition happen, and how would you compare/contrast the two fields?
RE: I was a sports writer in high school, for my local daily. Not an intern, an actual staff writer. Both fields involve reporting on what you saw with a great deal of subjectivity and latitude in language and style.
Fill in the blank: "If I wasn't a professional film critic, I'd be an op-ed columnist or a professor of English literature.
Which filmmaker (living or not) would you most like to meet, and why?
RE: I've met most of the living and recently departed. Going back further, Buster Keaton, of course.
What is your favorite film?
RE: Citizen Kane. I know it's the standard answer, but what can I say? I've taught it a shot at a time at least 40 times, recorded the commentary track, and could look at it again right now.
Who is your favorite director?
RE: Alphabetically: Altman, Herzog, Keaton, Scorsese.
What's the worst movie you've ever seen?
RE: Too many to choose from.
What's the best movie you've ever written? (Beyond the Valley of the Dolls, Up!, or Beneath the Valley of the Ultra-Vixens) And where did your two noms de plume, R. Hyde and Reinhold Timme, come from?
RE: BVD, of course. The pseudonyms came from Russ Meyer. It was no secret they belonged to me.
Who do you think is a shoo-in come Oscar night?
RE: Diablo Cody (Juno).
|
See-Jay 420 writes: on Dec 18 2007 06:52 PM Hello Roger. (Reply to this) |
|
jokerboy1991 writes: on Dec 18 2007 07:07 PM hope you feel better soon, your my favorite critic. I hope to see you again soon and your infamous thumbs back on TV. (Reply to this) |
|
shorndaddy writes: on Dec 18 2007 07:18 PM Thanks for the years and years of good reads, Roger. (Reply to this) |
|
Silverevilchao writes: on Dec 18 2007 07:19 PM FEH. I hate this guy, he said that video games can't be art. (Reply to this) |
|
Bardego writes: on Dec 18 2007 07:22 PM Hope all is well, Ebert. But seriously, what is with giving a bad review to The Usual Suspects? Seriously. (Reply to this) |
|
fullmetalnek writes: on Dec 18 2007 07:24 PM Man, he's just the best! Love reading his reviews. Hope everything goes well on january! (Reply to this) |
|
a_sad_un-sorry_hashbrown writes: on Dec 18 2007 07:42 PM He never said they can't be art, he just said no game has reached the level of beauty and sophistication that films have. (Reply to this) |
|
insanemansam5 writes: on Dec 18 2007 07:46 PM What is the state of current film criticism? RE: Flourishing, in great part because of the internet. What a wonderful and simply true answer I get sick and tired of critics saying the internet is bad for film criticism when the internet has allowed me to read about and become aware of so many films I would have never known of otherwise. (Reply to this) |
|
insanemansam5 writes: on Dec 18 2007 07:50 PM In reply to this comment (#1372209) That's true but he also allowed for an extensive discussion of whether or not video games could be considered art that has been unrivaled anywhere else on the internet. (Reply to this) |
|
TheAnswerMVP2001 writes: on Dec 18 2007 08:08 PM In reply to this comment (#1372231) Ah, I beg to differ... Final Fantasy X was more beautiful and sophisticated than most films out there today. (Reply to this) |
|
interestingfilms writes: on Dec 18 2007 08:32 PM In reply to this comment (#1372252) (Reply to this) |
|
Lesmana writes: on Dec 18 2007 08:33 PM Me personally, the only people deserve to be a film critic are filmmakers. Cmon, some guy that hasnt made a movie (or little of it) tells this movie sucks and the other's not..... Come to think of it, almost everyone who ever has a taste of making a film feel reluctant to badmouthed a movie, no matter how poorly it's made. Why?? I'd like to think Because they understand, it ain't no walking in the park...... I have never made a movie, and has numerously express my dissapointments or admiration for a movie with another movie buffs (as in here), which I think is just fine.....But to "attack" a movie or it's makers practically for the whole world, and regarded as "experts" on that while never make a movie (or little of it) themselves??? Cmon.... When Spielberg or jackson or perhaps even the wayans decided to become a critic, let me know...I'll surely regarded their opinions more (Reply to this) |
|
pom_pom288 writes: on Dec 18 2007 08:35 PM While I am often disagreeing with his reviews, there is no denying the impact he has had on the film industry. I wish him the best of luck during this difficult time. (Reply to this) |
|
arendr writes: on Dec 18 2007 09:25 PM Nice read. But are you guys going through every Chicago critic or something? (Reply to this) |
|
IKRfilmfan writes: on Dec 18 2007 09:35 PM Yay! It's Mr. Ebert! (Reply to this) |
|
Tollens writes: on Dec 18 2007 10:28 PM In reply to this comment (#1372252) Final Fantasy X was soulless crap. Keep sticking it to them. Even when I don't agree with Mr. Ebert I still usually understand why he disliked a film. My favorite critic. (Reply to this) |
|
elmokajaky writes: on Dec 18 2007 11:09 PM Get well soon, Mr. Ebert. And please, play Bioshock. (Reply to this) |
|
iheartbrucecampbell writes: on Dec 19 2007 12:20 AM the one critic i trust. i may not always agree with him (in fact, recently i haven't agreed with him much at all), but he's steered me in the right direction more consistently than any other critic out there. and his great movies section is an invaluable resource. (Reply to this) |
|
filmfestive writes: on Dec 19 2007 02:13 AM More than 30 years ago, Roger taught me (through a PBS series he hosted on Ingmar Bergman) how to look at film and I have been grateful ever since. Although I strongly disagree with your review of "The Natural", I miss you and wish you the best of luck with your upcoming surgery. (Reply to this) |
|
filmfestive writes: on Dec 19 2007 02:14 AM More than 30 years ago, Roger taught me (through a PBS series he hosted on Ingmar Bergman) how to look at film and I have been grateful ever since. Although I strongly disagree with your review of "The Natural", I miss you and wish you the best of luck with your upcoming surgery. (Reply to this) |
| You must be registered to post comments. Login or Register. |











