Meet a Critic: Scott Weinberg
You've seen his work online...now meet eFilmCritic's resident scribe!
To toast the holidays on this fine Christmas day, we bring you an all-new Meet a Critic...with the ubiquitous Scott Weinberg!
Everyone in online journalism knows and loves Philadelphia native Scott Weinberg. Like his hometown, Weinberg's passion for movies engenders a feeling of fraternal, film-geek kinship...and his well-observed film reviews are as satisfying as a cheese steak from Pat's King of Steaks. (Or Geno's. You choose.)
A beloved member of the RT community (and our former Newsdesk anchor), Weinberg has written extensively as a film and DVD critic for websites like Apollo Movie Guide, Cinematical, DVD Talk, FEARnet, Hollywood Bitchslap, and eFilmCritic, where he is managing editor. He also serves on the governing board of the Online Film Critics Association (OFCS), which counts over 175 international members among its ranks. As his 'net-spanning resume suggests, Weinberg is a consummate critic -- an opinionated writer with a voracious appetite for movies, sharing his insights into films you may not hear of otherwise.
And while he's got a natural bloodlust for all things horror (a recent review extols the covert virtues of 2006's Bikini Bloodbath), Weinberg's appreciation truly runs the gamut -- who else would dare take in a double feature of La Vie En Rose and The Evil Dead in one night? Read on to meet Scott Weinberg, look for him next month at Sundance, and give him a holler on the streets of Austin at South by Southwest!
Name: Scott Edward Weinberg
Age: I was born in the early 1970s. Someone else do the math!
Hometown: Philadelphia, as seen in Rocky, 12 Monkeys, Trading Places, Unbreakable, and (of course) Mannequin.
Years reviewing film: About nine, and thanks for reminding me.
Why and how did you become a critic?
Scott Weinberg: I've always been a junkie for films. The final product moreso than the casting reports, the gossip, and the production stuff. As a kid I used to wake up on Fridays and BOLT for the newspaper so I could read all the new reviews, check out all the new movie ads, and plan when I was going to sneak into something R rated. It's my dream job, really. As far as the HOW is concerned, I was working in Philly as a social worker when a friend who wrote for one of the weeklies read my stuff. She said it was a bit rough around the edges, but definitely informed, passionate, and entertaining to read. That one piece of praise and I was hooked. I found a few outlets that wanted my stuff, and I started writing (for no money) for a few years. I got a LOT better as a writer, made some contacts, asked around, and then some paying gigs came my way.
Fill in the blank: "If I wasn't a professional film critic, I'd be a ____________."
SW: Somewhere too depressing to think about. Thing is, you only live once, right? So it only makes sense to do something you LOVE. My hope is that everyone loves their job as much as I do. The money ain't great, I'll sure as heck tell you that much.
Describe your personal taste as a movie watcher...
SW: Well, thanks to my mom's mom, I grew up a carnivorous horror geek. (And I'll always love my grandmother for that!) But I also get misty-eyed at some of the girliest movies you can imagine. (Like, say, Waitress or Moulin Rouge.) Early in my career I discovered that you BETTER know a little about everything, just in case you're asked to review an old Fassbinder title, a new Wayans brothers debacle, or something in between. But while I can definitely get behind some of the "arthouse" fare, the honest truth is that I'm a popcorn junkie. I love summer-time movies (when they don't suck), and I still get pretty excited for certain 'event' movies. My #1 favorite, though, is being able to discover a new (usually horror) flick on the festival circuit and then helping to spread the word among my fellow film freaks. In other words, there's nothing I won't watch, but my preferences definitely lie in the genre department. Last night was a double feature: La Vie en Rose, followed by The Evil Dead.
Which filmmaker (living or not) who you'd most like to meet, and why?
SW: Either Sidney Lumet (check his filmography for why), Steve Martin (childhood hero, depsite his awful career choices of late), or Jennifer Connelly (just so I could stare at her face and then go stark raving mad). Or maybe Ed Wood, just so I could tell him that his name does live on.
What is your favorite film (or scene in a film)?
SW: If I had a dollar for every time I was asked this question, I'd have another 25 bucks to buy yet ANOTHER copy of Ridley Scott's Alien. Because, yes, that's my #1, all-time, top-of-the-chart, without question, supah-genius favorite film. For personal reasons, obviously, but also because I think it's one of the most "primally" effective horror films ever made. Good god did that movie scare me as a kid. Close behind in second place would be Mel Brooks' Young Frankenstein, which I think is just about the most perfect comedy I've ever seen. Smart, silly, strange, beautiful to look at, satirical yet affectionate -- and that cast! Tied for third place are about 500 films, including Miller's Crossing, Airplane!, Laura, The Blues Brothers, Strangers on a Train, Jaws and Raiders, the original King Kong, Texas Chainsaw Massacre, and Halloween, and (yep) the Lord of the Rings trilogy.
Who is your favorite director?
SW: Sidney Lumet, Terry Gilliam, John Carpenter, Guillermo del Toro, Hitchcock (kinda goes without saying), Joe Dante, Kubrick (see Hitchcock), David Fincher, Ridley Scott, Spielberg (see Kubrick), John Landis (pre-1984), Wes Craven, Adam Shankman (just kidding), Brad Anderson, Peter Berg, Brian Levant (see Shankman), and (of course) Joel and Ethan Coen.
What's the worst movie you've ever seen?
SW: Oh jeez. It's an easy pick, but Jerry Springer's Ringmaster pops into my head. Ever seen Spun? Dear lord. Oh wait, I got it: Patch Adams.
Who do you think is a shoo-in come Oscar night?
SW: Daniel Day-Lewis for There Will Be Blood. The guy's a force of freakin' nature in that film. Plus he delivers one helluva two-hour Jack Palance impersonation, and I always liked Jack Palance. And while she's not nearly a shoo-in, I'd be very pleased if Helena Bonham-Carter got some love for her work in Sweeney Todd.
Best overlooked film of 2007?
SW: For my fellow horror geeks, I'd say Bug, Hatchet, Behind the Mask, and Severance. Oh, and Vacancy. (And The Mist should have done better!) For films in general, I'll go with Breach, Death at a Funeral, First Snow, The King of Kong, My Kid Could Paint That, The Nines, Sunshine, and the excellent This is England.
Overlooked or not, Before the Devil Knows You're Dead, Persepolis, Sweeney Todd, Redacted, There Will Be Blood, Waitress and The Orphanage are among the best I've seen all year.
What's your most anticipated upcoming film?
SW: I try not to look TOO far ahead, because waiting for Iron Man is sort of like torture. So I see in January we have Cloverfield (marketing aside, it's a monster movie, and I was born for monster movies), Rambo (ha!), and not one but two Uwe Boll films. Plus I get to go classy and see a bunch of Sundance stuff, and their slate looks pretty promising this year. But yeah, Iron Man. Or The Hobbit.
Favorite film event of the year and why?
SW: Despite the fact that I'm lucky enough to attend both Sundance and Toronto Film Festivals, my favorite events of the year both take place in Austin, Texas. In March we have my very favorite film festival, which is South By Southwest. (Great programming, excellent people, and you simply haven't lived until you've had authentic BBQ.) Then in September I roll back into Austin and writhe around like a pig in poop at Fantastic Fest, which is one straight week of horror, sci-fi, fantasy, foreign weirdness, and a few BIG surprises. Great fun, great people.
|
Jack Sommersby writes: on Dec 25 2007 04:34 PM Super-duper interview of one of the most-read critics on the Internet. Was a real pleasure to read this Christmas Day. Hope Scott's around to review several thousand more films. (Reply to this) |
|
Bardego writes: on Dec 25 2007 05:15 PM I totally identify with his anticipation for the upcoming Uwe Boll films. (Reply to this) |
|
wbgoose13 writes: on Dec 25 2007 05:28 PM "The essence of criticism", eh? Well, you're gonna have to find someone else to refute that. (Reply to this) |
|
Jen Yamato writes: on Dec 25 2007 10:38 PM Not that I don't believe it, but I changed that phrase. (Reply to this) |
|
Erik Childress writes: on Dec 26 2007 07:36 AM Hey, I remember that phone call. :) A terrific interview for a series I hope just grows and grows and grows. Scott has always been a professional in an industry full of whores and simplified tastes. (Reply to this) |
|
fullmetalnek writes: on Dec 26 2007 08:27 AM I still can't understand how can he give a good review of the texas chainsaw massacre remake and at the same time hate the devils rejects? Greatest disagreement with him. Anyway, I really like reading his stuff. Everytime I check reviews for a film, I always read his. (Reply to this) |
|
red_wine writes: on Dec 26 2007 09:31 AM For a major film critic, I think his taste is appallingly mediocre. Iron Man??? (Reply to this) |
|
wbgoose13 writes: on Dec 26 2007 10:02 AM "Consummate critic" does admittedly go down better. ;) (Reply to this) |
|
Scott Weinberg writes: on Dec 27 2007 05:25 AM Jack, thanks pal! Bardego, Uwe Boll makes my job so much more fun. Goss, thanks amigo. Jen, thanks for the good questions! Very flattered you asked me, and very happy with the article. Erik, you da man. Metal, gracias! Red, thanks for calling me a major film critic. That praise outweighs your dismissal of my cinematic tastes by about 1,000 percent. (Reply to this) |
|
Jack Sommersby writes: on Dec 28 2007 09:41 PM In reply to this comment (#1395746) Well, Red Wine, this is one of the things that make Scott so commendable a critic: he's got eclectic taste and doesn't automatically look down on a film beforehand just because it's a big-budget Hollywood film. He'll give equal weight to "Iron Man" as he would "sex, lies, and videotape". The late, great critic Pauline Kael did an interview where she accused a lot of filmgoers as being "priggish" for championing the dead weight of the lifeless "Remains of the Day" just because it was a "classy" production while ignoring the bravura staging of Brian De Palma's much more entertaining "Carlito's Way" the same year. So just because Scott's looking forward to something like "Iron Man" doesn't mean he's a puerile, popcorn-munching simpleton -- he's simply agog over something that, in his true film lover's eyes, is ripe with potential. (Reply to this) |
|
red_wine writes: on Dec 29 2007 01:33 AM In reply to this comment (#1403891) Its not being priggish, but I dearly loved The Remains Of The Day. I for one consider drama to be one of the few arenas where genuine cinematic excellence can be achieved. I am plain sick of the big budget Hollywood action film. They mostly have teenage level scripts and appeal to people just looking out for low-intellect cheap entertainment. I hated Spiderman 3 and Pirates 3. I don't think its necessary to take leave of your intelligence to properly enjoy a film. (Reply to this) |
|
Scott Weinberg writes: on Dec 29 2007 10:48 AM Perhaps my Top Ten will elevate your opinion of me. htt If not, it's cool. I happen to think that certain blockbusters are quite intelligent indeed. Not arthouse contemplative, mind you, but there's a little more brains behind, say X-Men 2 or Spider-Man than there has to be. And sometimes they're just flashy-looking boxes of eye-candy. And sometimes they suck eggs. (Reply to this) |
|
EDouglas writes: on Dec 29 2007 02:17 PM LOL! Why did I clink on that link? I spend a lot of time trying to avoid Scott at film festivals*, and now I know more about him than I ever *wanted* to know! :) Hey, Jen, next up you should do a feature on Emmanuel Levy or Josh Tyler. I want to know what makes those guys tick. (*that's a joke, Scott) (Reply to this) |
|
red_wine writes: on Dec 29 2007 07:04 PM The Top 10 is fine indeed. And just so that you know, I'm not a grumpy world-weary 70 year old but just a teenager. So even I occasionally enjoy a good action film, and I did like Spiderman and Raiders Of The Lost Arc. But overall, I avoid watching these kind of films. Of the fare served this year, I haven't yet managed to watch all, but my current No.1 is Ratatouille. (Reply to this) |
|
PopeAndrewPaul writes: on Dec 30 2007 01:37 AM In reply to this comment (#1408953) Ah a teenager... with the username like Red Wine... ah huh. I'm not saying, I'm just saying. (Reply to this) |
|
Damon687 writes: on Dec 31 2007 07:09 PM Iron Man is being directed by Jon Favreau who I have always enjoyed, he's done a good job directing so far and is beyond serious about making this a good movie. There is no question his direction combined with Robert Downey Jr's acting skills and we have an excellent recipe for a top quality popcorn action flick (the best kind). Before I saw the trailer for Iron Man, I only cared because of the director and star. Now that I have seen the trailer, it looks great. I can completely see why he is really looking forward to it, can't wait to see it myself. (Reply to this) |
|
BrokebackYoda writes: on Jan 01 2008 09:45 PM In reply to this comment (#1393441) .......Why? (Reply to this) |
|
BrokebackYoda writes: on Jan 01 2008 09:46 PM In reply to this comment (#1393441) .......Why? (Reply to this) |
|
LillyVon writes: on Jan 02 2008 02:05 PM Wow, what a great interview and certainly a 'man after my own heart'. Not too many people I've spoken to have Alien as their favourite movie of all time. Yes, it's mine too - well on par with Holy Grail of course. I'm also a huge 'early work' Steve Martin fan. The Jerk, The Man with Two Brains and Dead Men Dont Wear Plaid are all on my funniest movies of all time list. I'm yet to see Waitress but given your taste in movies I'll definately check it out. I totally agree on Death at a Funeral. Shame is bombed in America. It kicked arse here in Australia. In fact I think it did it's best world wide box office here. Yes, we have great taste down under! I'll make sure to check your reviews out from now on. One question - did you really like 'Before the Devil Knows Your Dead' BECAUSE it was a Sidney Lumet - or maybe 'swayed' because it was a Lumet? Just curious because although a good film - I did not find it 'great'. Like for example I'm suprised you didn't prefer No Country For Old Men over 'Devil'? Just curious as to your opinion. All the best Lillyvon (Reply to this) |
|
LillyVon writes: on Jan 02 2008 06:22 PM In reply to this comment (#1404308) You can actually be intelligent and enjoy a 'brainless' 'fun' movie. God I hate film snobs. What does your boyfriend think of your taste in movies? (Reply to this) |
| You must be registered to post comments. Login or Register. |






