ROTTEN TOMATOES: New Cloverfield Stills, TV Spots, Production Notes Online

New Cloverfield Stills, TV Spots, Production Notes Online

Now how are we supposed to get anything done today?

by Jeff Giles | January 10, 2008

With a little over a week to go before Cloverfield reaches theaters, it's time for the hype machine to kick into high gear -- which is why you've got a whole bunch of new J.J. Abrams-produced monster-movie goodness to feast your eyes on this morning!

We're talking specifically about 25 new stills, two new TV spots, and -- spoiler(s) alert! -- 38 pages of Cloverfield production notes. We've helpfully arranged everything at the links below, so dim the lights in your office, tell the boss you have a doctor's appointment, and spend the next hour or two taking an early look at stars Michael Stahl-David, Lizzy Caplan, Mike Vogel, Jessica Lucas, T.J. Miller, and Odette Yustman running for their lives. Click on each image to view the full gallery!

And click here for the production notes.

Source: ComingSoon (TV spots)

Related Items

Celeb:	Lizzy Caplan
	Mike Vogel
	Jessica Lucas
	Michael Stahl-David
	Odette Yustman
	T.J. Miller

(1-20 of 49 posts) | Reply

dahluzz writes:
on Jan 10 2008 06:31 AM

shots of the monster? why would they be here if the monster's not even gonna be in the movie? is there a monster at all? probly not. and no, it's not scarier to just imagine the monster. if that's what i'm expected to do, why sit through 2 hours of screaming and explosions caught on a DV cam? there will be no pay-off here.

(Reply to this)

opTIMus Nerd writes:
on Jan 10 2008 06:54 AM

There will be a monster and it will be disappointing to everyone on the internet and then EVERYONE will HATE it; yet it will succeed at the box office all the same. Hopefully, a sequel produced and directed by someone else (preferably someone no one's ever heard of)and the Cloverfield monster will fight Mothra or something.

I still think the monster will turn out to be a Mario Bowser.

(Reply to this)

Dave the Destroyer writes:
on Jan 10 2008 07:40 AM

After all, unbelievable as it may seem to some, there are people in the world that have NOT been feverishly following every tidbit, every morsel that Internet addicts have been slobbering all over for the last six months - there are even people that might go see "Cloverfield" with (*GASP*) an Open, Unbiased, Un-Hype-Scrambled brain.

The Horror....the Horror....somebody who reserves their opinion until AFTER they've actually seen the movie.

But, who cares about them, eh?

(Reply to this)

opTIMus Nerd writes:
on Jan 10 2008 07:53 AM

I care Dave. You are right!

(Reply to this)

dahluzz writes:
on Jan 10 2008 08:11 AM

In reply to this comment (#1450117)
but that's what we do here, dave. we speculate. and then once the movie's out, we speculate on what might have been. it's kind of one of the main reasons to comment on this site. well, aside from trying to make fun of the speculators, right?

(Reply to this)

LordVapor writes:
on Jan 10 2008 09:08 AM

I think it will be a good movie....i think it will be more of a cross of some type of normal animal that the slusho crap ends up turning into a giant *almost like when the old cheesy power rangers would kick a monsters tail and then the main bad guy would make it get all giant....* wonder if in the sequel they end up having them morph over and clean up the ocean floor with this beast lol

(Reply to this)

arendr writes:
on Jan 10 2008 09:37 AM

I get the feeling that this movie will be like a Blair Witch kind of thing where the hype tells people it will be scary, but in reality it isn't. I mean, the acting in the commercials/trailers is terrible.

(Reply to this)

LowBalls writes:
on Jan 10 2008 09:39 AM

I read on a website that the monster in Cloverfield will in fact be The Stay Puff Marshmellow Man. This will be the monsters second big screen performance after his 1984 blockbuster "Ghostbusters".

(Reply to this)

Eldorado writes:
on Jan 10 2008 10:16 AM

If it were, I would definitely pay to see the old Stay Puft again!

(Reply to this)

southwick writes:
on Jan 10 2008 10:37 AM

/shrug I thought Blair Witch was a good suspense scare the first time I saw it.
Then again its a movie I will never see again.

(Reply to this)

Maalstrom Aran writes:
on Jan 10 2008 11:08 AM

The Slusho Monster comes to town! I'd be upset too, if I was made of so many different fun fruity flavors.

(Reply to this)

Scarborough Fair writes:
on Jan 10 2008 11:35 AM

I read that the monster was a giant crying Hillary Clinton.

(Reply to this)

ivor1 writes:
on Jan 10 2008 11:37 AM

Sounds neat I can't wait; a first person narrative, a la, "Children of Men" hand held cameras and everyone walking around half dazed like 9/11. Hope they can pull it off. For me, I would love to see the "monster" as a "Human" giant, check out my, "teen giants" portfolio page.

(Reply to this)

trpsomewhere writes:
on Jan 10 2008 11:55 AM

I'll let you know when I watch it! :-P

(Reply to this)

Skadalilama writes:
on Jan 10 2008 01:08 PM

In reply to this comment (#1450087)
Dahluzz,

Clearly someone hasn't been researching. Matt Reeves said it himself that you will see the monster in very intimate detail. Why do you think there won't be a monster when it clearly shows the back of it in the second trailer?

(Reply to this)

Dave the Destroyer writes:
on Jan 10 2008 01:12 PM

In reply to this comment (#1450161)
Aaaah, I'm too busy to hunt down glazed-over, sweaty little freaks with nothing better to do than bellyache that filmmakers have absolutely no right to make the movie that THEY want to make, instead of what the whiny, unpleasable fanboys want them to make. I got enough of those "The-World-Revolves-Around-ME" chowderheads here at work as it is...

I just intend to go see "Cloverfield" and THEN evaluate it on it's own merits, instead of crying all over my keyboard that it's not the Flaming Goddamn Masterpiece that I've been cranking myself up over since July - instead of the usual re-hashed, videogame-ripoff, incoherent 92-minute direct-to-DVD brain farts that comprise the vast bulk of movies today....

(Reply to this)

ManofStee1 writes:
on Jan 10 2008 01:20 PM

Yes we all get that the Statue of Liberty gets decapitated. Stop beating us over the head with it Abrams.

(Reply to this)

T45Red writes:
on Jan 10 2008 01:28 PM

This movie looks like it could be very good, or very bad. I'll wait until after the movie though. I like it how they are going with something new though, by using the hand held camera to such an extent, as well as going back to a monster movie. Sounds like the makings or a good, fun movie.

(Reply to this)

dethburger writes:
on Jan 10 2008 02:03 PM

Dave the Destroyer is right...clinically insane, but right.

(Reply to this)

Dave the Destroyer writes:
on Jan 10 2008 02:19 PM

In reply to this comment (#1450860)
Shucks, I'm not sure which of those I should agree with....

(Reply to this)

RottenTomatoes.com