B 4 I write any reveiws, I will always veiw the movie first. Unlike some who would think the most important thing, is to be first with a reveiw at the expense of quality in truth. Which is the case in the movie HANCOCK. I am new to this site and I thought I would give it a chance. The 2 reveiwers that critic the movie totally missed the point. They sounded like they did not see the movie at all. They were busy saying what others of their kind (Critics) were saying. Things like ... That's right, they said nothing because they did not see the movie, so they could not say anything helpful about it. I don't know, I thought when you preceeded the prefix 're' in front of the word 'veiw', it meant, and I may be wrong, you may have seen the movie first? When you do that, it renders what you have to say as BS and why should we care about what you say ever again. There's a trust issue envoled and it going to be hard to put faith in what you have to say in the future. With that said, HANCOCK as Summer Blockbusters go, lives up 2 the tradition of blockbuster movies. There was action from beginning to end. The plot itself, kept you awake between the action scenes. I would not put to muck stock in what the critics have 2 say, especially the 2 mentioned above. IT IS A VERY FUN AND ENTERTAINING WATCHFEST that will leave you wanting more. The tention between Mr. Smith and Ms. Theron alone gave me a quarter shwing and that has not happen from the silver screen in quite a while. Go see the movie.


PS: What the deal with putting the 150 million movie like HANCOCK in the same catagory as, come on, Blankman and pleaseee...Meteor Man. Get the Fake out of here.