PROFILE STATS
- Total Profile Views:
- 8201
- Profile Views Last 7 Days:
- 7
ABOUT
- Member Since
- October 2008
- Best Movie Seat
- middle
RATINGS SNAPSHOT
RATINGS
Showing 1 - 1 of 1 Ratings for 28 Days Later
| Title | Genre |
Date
|
Rating | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
28 Days Later (2002) |
9/02/10 |
60% |
|
|
xwadewilsonx on 9/02/10 at 08:14 PM
I personally felt this was a great film. Nice review btw. Thumbs up!
0 Replies | Report Abuse
Ryan M on 9/03/10 at 06:53 AM
This wasn't THAT graphic. I thought it was a powerful tale of survival. I don't think it's worth criticizing just because you think it's too "extreme" (which it really isn't). You want extreme? Watch "Cannibal Holocaust". Otherwise, I think you made some PRETTY good points (aside from the fact that the violence obscured your opinion of this film). Good review overall. Thumbs up.
1 Replies | Report Abuse
Throw An Onion on 9/03/10 at 12:48 PM
It was a powerful tale of survival, just the last third turned into a typical gorefest zombie flick. I don't have any problem with graphic violence in a film but it has to serve a purpose. Saving Private Ryan, Gran Torino, and No Country for Old Men all used graphic violence effectively. 28 Days Later didn't need to go as far as it did and thus it wasn't as good as I thought it could have been.
1 Replies | Report Abuse
Ryan M on 9/05/10 at 08:17 AM
Grand Torino was NOT graphic and No Country for Old Men wasn't anything out of the ordinary. And 28 Days Later is a zombie flick. Good zombie flicks need gore. That is how it works.
2 Replies | Report Abuse
Throw An Onion on 9/05/10 at 09:31 AM
Let me clarify, 28 Days Later lost me when Jim started killing guys with his bare hands. It didn't add anything to his character and was needlessly graphic. I realize zombie gore is essential and I didn't have any problem with the zombies I just didn't think the human on human violence was necessary.
Report Abuse
Ryan M on 3/10/11 at 05:38 PM
I shall argue against that. The brutality definitely added something. It has the potential to do so. In this case, it showed that Jim has become a wild, mad beast.
Report Abuse
Captain Hindsight on 9/04/10 at 03:12 PM
Great review man. Personally this film didn't entertain me in any way, but that's just me. Great review.
1 Replies | Report Abuse
Throw An Onion on 9/05/10 at 09:31 AM
You don't like zombies? Not even British ones?
1 Replies | Report Abuse
Captain Hindsight on 9/05/10 at 10:49 AM
I love zombie movies actually, just not this one. We're expected to believe that zombies don't attack people in comas. And the whole eye gouging didn't really make sense. Tons of zombies running around, yet you have time to stop running for a good eye gouge. The Brits had an epic fail with this one.
0 Replies | Report Abuse
Ryan M on 9/05/10 at 11:46 AM
....I guess it blended in for me. I see what you're saying. But I really didn't mind it that much.
0 Replies | Report Abuse