The Tomatometer rating – based on the published opinions of hundreds of film and
television critics – is a trusted measurement of movie and TV programming quality
for millions of moviegoers. It represents the percentage of professional critic reviews
that are positive for a given film or television show.
From the Critics
From RT Users Like You!
The Tomatometer is 60% or higher.
The Tomatometer is 59% or lower.
The Tomatometer is 75% or higher, with 40 reviews (movies) or 20 reviews (TV). At least 5 reviews from Top Critics.
Percentage of users who rate a movie or TV show positively.
Definitely good fun, and mostly unimpugnable in that category. Chris Pratt is likeable, as is the rest of the core group, and they create a motley mix of rapscallions that believably join forces to save the day, etc. etc. It's funny, the film looks luxurious and colorful in so many ways, the chief characters get enough development to make their arcs interesting and fulfilling. That said, Guardians never truly rises to excellence, and possibly not even "very good" like some other Marvel Cinematic Universe flicks, maintaining a steady plateau of expected beats that are nonetheless quite entertaining. I anticipated a strong soundtrack coming in, but it still was unexpectedly good in parts. The film bore resemblance to Pirates of the Caribbean on more than one occasion - but that's mostly a good thing, in my opinion, especially in a space opera setting. Fun stuff.
Marvelously entertaining caper romp, with wisps of poignancy in the right moments that aren't falsely contrived like in earlier Anderson efforts. GBH is hilarious and dark, beaconed by Ralph Fiennes' tremendous comic energy and wit. There's not a lot of character depth going on that we find in Wes Anderson's stronger films (Moonrise Kingdom, The Royal Tenenbaums), but there are enough beats to color the pages of his hallmark picture book visual style meaningfully. The caper format, too, allows the story to hurdle forward without forcing emotions, letting the director to cadence things with a rollicking mixture of whimsy, jokiness and tension. The Grand Budapest Hotel is a manic extension of many recognizable Wes Anderson quirks, like an eclectic playset with bonus accessories for all the dolls within, but the chaos is grounded enough to follow to linear story milestones, with a glaze of wistfulness, a simplified experience in a sense but no less rewarding. It lives on the edges of his best work, in my opinion.
Asghar Farhadi's follow-up to the outstanding A Separation, The Past is a confident, engrossing film that buoys itself from becoming too talky by keeping a deliberate rhythm to each scene and conversation. It even covers some similar themes - along with the ever-present and unwelcoming obtrusiveness of the one stated in the title, there's the exploring of relationships / marriages both before, during, and after both parties drift from each other, and the forces that pull each away.
With A Separation, there's a central tragedy to the circumstances that seem utterly convincing and the personalities and dreams of each party prevent a compromise from actualizing. It's similar here, but even more electric and possibly scandalous, particularly with Berenice Bejo's Marie-Anna character. But the film is truly anchored with Ali Mosaffa's Ahmad, the man who comes back to Paris, from Iran, to complete his divorce from Marie-Anna, and gradually falls back into old dramas by pragmatically unspooling a mystery at the core of the film. It's fascinating, in a subtle manner, to watch, as the film is unafraid to confront the material, where lesser films might have their characters learn these secrets learned to their advantage, instead of disseminating to all parties and dealing with it, until the next plot development. It's mature, observed storytelling.
The problem is, the film goes about two or three "reveals" too many, stretching the believability of said central mystery and the emotions riding with it. And when the film veers from Ahmad as the audience surrogate, it loses momentum. Still, it's another expertly made movie that almost has a touch of Almodovar to it, with fine performances elevating the film from an ordinary, Euro-style relationship drama. Asghar Farhadi is going to make many more good movies.
Luxurious, transporting, and grand - though not always effective... but in general, I truly enjoyed The Great Beauty. It's a lovely experience, even if you're not entirely sure on some scenes, it still evokes something in the viewer, usually something strong and almost always enthralling.
Now, the film's been considered a rehash of some of the old Italian greats of cinema, most notably Fellini's La Dolce Vita. I've seen La Dolce Vita, but since it's not embedded in my filmic vocabulary, The Great Beauty doesn't come off as derivative at all to me. And even if it was mimicking those styles and structures (and it does, at least for La Dolce Vita), it still achieves its own emotions and glimpses of beauty, that the complaint seems less relevant to me. And that's where the film works - it's a mesmerizing glide through self-reflective waters for a post-midlife Italian socialite / novelist in Rome named Jep. Like life, Jep wanders in and out of scenes of confusion, awkwardness, emptiness, sadness, and beauty, set against the sumptuous nighttime Roman landscape. There's a loose arc through it all, and when I thought the film might end... it carried on another 40 minutes (!). Not that it was all bad, but there is certain several peaks and valleys that make The Great Beauty not the easiest to process, but it was ultimately rewarding and one I was happy to experience.
I liked The Desolation of Smaug despite a great deal of flaws... and apologizing for liking Jackson's most recent cinematic voyages to Middle-Earth is becoming troublingly commonplace lately, though it doesn't bother me so much. Yet. Its excess seems on fuller display here than in last year's An Unexpected Journey, but there is still a detectable sense of adventure that supercedes the silliness, for me. But, it's a tricky balance. The barrel sequence is astonishingly fun despite being over-the-top, and the spider scenes had some purpose despite also showing a fair amount of near-misses. And Smaug? He's another satisfying creature creation from PJ (Cumberbatch's voice talents help here, too), even though Smaug's scenes funnel into yet another protracted sequence of near-death and dwarven ingenuity. I barely remember the book, so I have no comparison reference points to draw ire from here - which is probably a good thing, given the book's length and that this will be a bleeping 9-hour trilogy. Still, the movies are fun and competently rendered, even if Peter Jackson's storytelling is being sacrificed to squeeze in so much transparent padding.