The Passion of the Christ
(2004)
9 years ago via Rotten Tomatoes
So as i said i saw The Passion and Dogville recently and thought id let yall know how i think.
[img]http://www.chloesevigny.com/chloe_pictures/gbjghgfh.jpg[/img]
I don't have alot of time right now and i wanna talk more about The Passion, but the gist is that [b]Dogville [/b]is endlessly facinating, original, stunningly acted, and almost a masterpiece...i just need to see it again. Ive never seen a movie create as much tension, drama, and true human emotion with the use of such bare and intriguing techniques. The fact that the film is shot on a soundstage, with chalk outlines for houses and sound effects for doors opening where there are no doors is masterful in itself. At first i thought it was just a stupid novelty thing to attract viewers but it lends itself to the story so much. You really feel how the down of Dogville is a place of its own, seperated from the world, and you can feel the entrapment that its residents live with. Nicole Kidman plays Grace, a fugitive on the fun that the town takes in, and as usual Kidman serves up an amazing understated performance.
Her character is so quiet, so nuanced, she speaks softly, doesnt yell, barely cries or shows any emotion, yet manages to capture your attention at all time. Kidman is truly the finest actress working today, and Dogville just continues her string of amazing movies with amazing performances.
***1/2 out of **** - maybe ****...the ending needs some thinking on.
[img]http://angrywhitefemale.net/passion-gibson.jpg[/img]
As to The Passion...its hard to say how i feel about it. One the one hand i thought is was one of the most well crafted films ive seen in a lonnggg time, but ont he other hand i felt any spirituality or message was sacrificed for shock value. It was almost as if Gibson wanted to shock us into believing in Jesus...like its one big guilt trip. The entire movie is essentially watching Jesus get the crap kicked out of him, and after a while the effect started to wear off (especially in the interminable cross caring scene....how many times can i watch him fall down in slow motion!).
The movie is not without its good points though, like i said the craftmanship is excellent, its beautiful to look at, with a haunting score. Technically the films a marvel, the sets and costumes make it extremely authentic feeling, and Gibson is very sure of himself and his camerawork, never ceasing to amaze me on the new ways to present the same scene to make it seem less repetitive (e.g the lashing scene).
It had some brilliant scenes, like when Mary holds jesus after he is taken off the cross (seen in ads), she stares directly into the camera, placing the blame directly on us, on our sins for what we have witnessed throughout the film. Is that extreme, and kind of offencive in an odd way...sure, but he gets his point across with a punch.
The acting is good considering most of the actors barely say anything...mostly its just the taunts and jeers of onlookers. Jim Caczevial is great...but doesnt really get to do much other than look hurt...which he probably was. The best performance was the lady who played Mary (to lazy to look it up). Her performance of silence and restrain spoke emotional volumes, her performance maeks the film worth seeing.
So as of right now im divided on the film, i myself am a flaming athiest, but can still enjoy a good story, and the story of the sacrifices of Christ is a great story of love and redemption even if I dont believe it. But i cant get over how the film is just a visual representation of violence and gore done to Jesus christ without any real message or content.
*** out of ****