10,000 B.C. - Movie Reviews - Rotten Tomatoes

10,000 B.C. Reviews

Page 1 of 8
March 6, 2008
Worst of all, no one even gets eaten by the disappointingly tame saber-toothed tiger.
Full Review | Original Score: 2/5
May 20, 2008
In fact, while sitting through this banal attempt at a big-scale epic, I could not help but go through a checklist in my mind of all the movies "10,000 B.C." borrows from.
Full Review | Original Score: 1.5/5
March 7, 2008
Where's Raquel Welch in that fur bikini?
Read More | Original Score: 2/5
October 14, 2012
A lousier adventure movie you won't find this year: 10,000 B.C. belongs, if not back in the stone age, then at least back in the mid '90s, where this sort of mindless, effects-driven drivel is best left.
Full Review | Original Score: 2/5
March 7, 2008
10,000 B.C. isn't only brain-dead, it's completely dead. It's inert and without a heartbeat.
Full Review | Original Score: 1.5/4
March 7, 2008
If you are ten years old fan of video games with a short attention span and no knowledge of history, you will love this movie. The further you stray from these core qualifications, the less you will love it.
Full Review | Original Score: C
March 6, 2008
A lovely-to-look-at but ultimately forgettable adventure flick that feels like a cross between Land of the Pharaohs and the greatest hits of Joseph Campbell.
March 10, 2008
While there are moments, '10,000 B.C.' never makes you jump. On the plus side, the movie isn't as lumbering as those digital elephantine beasts.
March 6, 2008
I can't figure out exactly when the film 10,000 B.C. is set, but it's definitely ancient times. Like before they had cars, guns or tabloid blogs. And definitely before they had cohesive plots or dialogue that made sense.
Full Review | Original Score: 2.5/4
July 24, 2009
Brace yourself for a mammoth disappointment.
Full Review | Original Score: 1/4
August 27, 2009
Heavy on moronic mysticism and light on imagination, excitement, and shot-to-shot coherence
March 6, 2008
In an age where ... audiences reward blood-and-thunder films ... at the box office, greenlighting 10,000 B.C. must have seemed logical. I can imagine someone pitching the film ...by saying "It's like 300 .... plus 9,700!"
Full Review | Original Score: 1/4
March 7, 2008
The mammoths are cool. The squealing killer ostriches, perhaps inspired by ancient phorusrhacid fossils, are idiotic but... okay, they're idiotic.
Full Review | Original Score: 1/4
March 6, 2008
An atrocious waste of a perfectly good CGI budget ... at least the Geico commercials make an effort to get the historical accuracy right
Full Review | Original Score: 3/10
March 17, 2008
It's a horrible movie.
March 7, 2008
10,000 B.C. is a movie of woolly mammoths and fuzzy thinking.
Read More | Original Score: 2/4
March 7, 2008
10,000 B.C. takes a prehistoric approach to storytelling.
Full Review | Original Score: 2/4
March 6, 2008
Roland Emmerich is partial to cutting-edge special effects and stone-age storytelling, meaning that 10,000 B.C., a dim-witted CG extravaganza set in prehistoric times, is something like his ideal project.
Full Review | Original Score: 1.5/4
March 22, 2008
It's just a wrong movie altogether, an elaborately nonsensical stew of crazy costumes, bizarre accessories, and funny voices.
Full Review | Original Score: D+
March 9, 2008
Visually, historically and creatively, this film dishonors the year 10,000 B.C.
Full Review | Original Score: 2/10
Page 1 of 8