Destricted - Movie Reviews - Rotten Tomatoes

Destricted Reviews

Page 1 of 1
October 16, 2015
Like most films of its type, "Destricted" is a decidedly mixed bag.
Full Review | Original Score: 2/4
November 4, 2010
That it's taken Destricted nearly five years since its debut at the 2006 Sundance Film Festival to turn up in theaters is doubly unsurprising.
June 15, 2007
Like real sex, this collection ranges from exhilarating to frustrating, from kinky to dull - and like real porn, it will have the viewer wishing at times for a fast-forward button.
Full Review | Original Score: 3/5
September 23, 2006
Destricted is a series of short films by directors and video artists ostensibly investigating the relationship between eroticism and pornography. A lot of them are dire.
Full Review | Original Score: 2/5
September 23, 2006
[A] mixed bag.
September 23, 2006
The graphic content guarantees that this will attract sensationalist attention. But, beneath the provocation and pretention, there are some interesting ideas here -- even though they're not always subtly expressed.
Full Review | Original Score: 3/5
September 23, 2006
Whatever most of the filmmakers here were trying to achieve, it sheds no light on porn, simply reproducing it at its most trite, stale and unimaginative.
Full Review | Original Score: 3/10
September 5, 2006
Full of hardcore, show-all scenes of couples getting it on, it's supposed to provoke debate about sex and art. In reality, porn has rarely triggered so many yawns.
Full Review | Original Score: 2/5
August 31, 2006
These shorts are essentially obscene. But they're also artful and intriguing.
Full Review | Original Score: 3/5
May 10, 2006
Wearing its presumed scandal value like a merit badge, porn omnibus Destricted loses almost all its salacious appeal as soon as it hits the screen.
March 27, 2006
It's a very up-and-down affair that alternately has us reaching for a smoke and wishing it was enough already so we can just get some sleep.
Full Review | Original Score: 2.5/4
February 4, 2006
Destricted is good for a few inadvertent laughs, but as a sociological statement on human sexuality, it's practically worthless.
Full Review | Original Score: 0/5
Page 1 of 1