I'll Believe You - Movie Reviews - Rotten Tomatoes

I'll Believe You Reviews

Page 1 of 2
½ June 14, 2012
A different storyline from the usual stuff .... Pretty good "B" movie
March 28, 2012
I'm pretty sure a deaf guy listening to deaf musicians chose the music for this movie. Also, the editing is horrible--the jumpy camera in the playground scene was the first laugh the movie got out of me. It couldn't seem to be able to contain all three characters in the same shot, the poor thing.
However, Ed Helms was great. Blew Chris Elliot's oddly shirtless performance out of the water.
½ September 11, 2011
I could tell this was a low budget movie at the start of the first scene, but it sort of fit the (very weak) plot, I have been to Melbourne Florida, and the film was shot there and it is central to the plot. Everyone knows Florida has it's share of wing nuts, this movie would give one the impression that everyone that lives there is not normal, not too beliveable. I purchased this on DVD and I almost was not able to finish watching this, and I am an American in Afghanistan, where there is a severe shortage of movies to choose from. For me the film was too slow to get to the point, poorly edited, almost absent of any special effects for a Sci-Fi Comedy, and I never really cared about the 3 main Characters. The acting seemed forced and the actors uncomfortable in their roles. The one saving grace in the film is Patrick Warburton, it was good to see him going beyond his Puddy and the Tick cadence and really do some acting . There is also a fair bit of improve by Chris Elliott, Ed Helms and Warburton but when known stars are on screen and going off script riffing during improve, Basche, Pleasants and Gallo seem star struck and, stunned, obviously out classed as actors, instead of being able to play off the other actors lines. I wanted it to be better. The DVD does have some extras, and I admit I watched the making of and saving of I'll Believe You, and in it, almost everyone in the making of admitted it was a bad movie. Good idea, but poorly executed.
½ July 10, 2011
Very weak. The characters aren't strong and the story line is blah... there are several funny moments, but it's not worth it really. I got it just to heck out Ed Helms, but he's not much in it.
October 9, 2010
average and not at all worth anything.
October 9, 2010
Only the second time I've seen this movie. The first was at the world premiere. It held up surprisingly well.
August 8, 2010
the ending was funnier than the rest of the movie combined...
April 26, 2010
An Intriguing What If

The thing is, they all think they're actually like this. All those people on those late-night call in shows all think they're actually in on the Secrets of the Universe. They think Men in Black are following them, just waiting to kill them for revealing what they know. This made me wary about the movie. The important question to me was how seriously they were going to take it. Netflix does list it as a comedy, thank Gods, but that doesn't necessarily mean that it's a comedy that isn't going to drive me batty with its implicit assumptions of how the universe works. And yeah, there's the moment where the scientist is encouraged to throw logic out the window, is told that everyone chooses what to believe, and she shouldn't be so worried about evidence. Such things always bother me. However, this is a place where the evidence itself can be interpreted a couple of different ways, and it's just a matter of how you look at it.

Dale Sweeney (David Alan Basche) is the host of one of those desperate radio call in shows aimed toward encouraging all the weirdos to call in with their stories, though depressingly, no one ever does. He's about to lose his job, which means the horrifying prospect of working for his brother, Kyle (Thomas Gibson), owner of Hose World. His best friends are Officer Nick Senna (Patrick Gallo) and science teacher Paige Zinke (Cece Pleasants), and they have deep sympathy for his problems--which seem solved when a call very late at night involves someone drinking in a mysterious language which, of course, they immediately determine to be alien. Suddenly, Dale has incredible ratings. He's even being offered the morning drive time slot, which he doesn't take because his mystery caller, played by Patrick Warburton, says he needs the specific five minutes Dale can give him. There is great debate over the question of whether or not he's really an alien, with Paige leaning very heavily toward hoaxer.

The film does, happily, give equal time to the skeptics, and they aren't being looked down upon. This isn't Scully denying the facts which are right in front of her. Half the crazies are demonstrably crazy no matter what else is going on, no matter whether they're right or wrong. The skeptics have dealt quite a lot with these people, and the film agrees that they should be frustrated. They're not deluded, and looking at the evidence objectively is not the same as blinding yourself to What's Really Out There. There is a lot of at least lip service given to actual science--a gator wrangler played by Chris Elliott talks about the part of time travel that no one considers--the Earth does, after all, move, and it will move out from under you. Where you are standing now may seem like the same place you were standing two weeks ago, but the Earth has moved--heck, the Sun has moved. That's leaving aside all the other physics, which the film doesn't really go into.

I can't help thinking that the ratings of shows on at one in the morning aren't necessarily the most important aspect. Being cheap, for example. Being cheap was also a major concern for the filmmakers, it turns out--even though they completely rearranged the beginning of the movie, it was all done in post. They couldn't afford to do any reshooting. Which is alarming, given that they threw out the subplot it involved entirely. It's a good thing, mind. The subplot was dumb and distracted from the focus, such as it is, of the movie. Honestly, it's kind of impressive, all things considered, that they got the minor celebrities they did. It's not so surprising that they couldn't get them in to redo all their scenes when they figured out that the beginning wasn't working. Still, though, this was one cost-cutting method I didn't notice, so that's something. It's obvious the film is low budget, but it's still far better than a lot of the low budget stuff I've seen with puppets in the corner.

I have never believed that there is no life elsewhere than Earth. The idea that there might be some deep in the liquid water oceans of Europa is fascinating to me, and I like to hope we'll have an answer in my lifetime. However, if the life of Europa turns out to be much more than microbial, I will be greatly surprised. Either way, it is vastly unlikely to be life as we know it. Certainly I do not believe that we are being visited by visitors from another planet, regularly or indeed at all. The movie had to either sell me on the possibility or at least get me to accept that these were otherwise rational people with a reason to themselves be sold on the possibility. I have a hard time laughing at people who are just crazy, and I have a hard time sympathizing with characters who willfully ignore evidence. Which, when you get right down to it, is why I don't listen to the kinds of shows this movie is about in the first place.
½ March 2, 2010
Had a really impressive cast, but I had a hard time telling whether this was a student film or a family movie with a target demographic of 8 year olds.
½ February 3, 2010
It has a quick, light pace, a thoughtful approach, engaging characters, and a terrific cast (Ed Helms!), but it's also visibly low budget, introspective, and has a laughably predictable ending and quirky sense of humor, and, sadly, those things will prove an unavoidable barrier to some viewers.
½ December 16, 2009
When I read the plot I thought it seemed like a good concept. It must have seemed like a great idea to someone, however it did not produce a script that was anywhere near good enough to attract a stellar budget or a stellar cast. overall, it looks cheap and feels flat.
½ November 22, 2009
You know, going in to a movie knowing next to nothing about it other than the front DVD cover and who stars on it, is sometimes a great way of seeing stuff. The two films above this were seen in such a way, and without any ideas as to whether I would like or not like either one, I loved one, hated the other. This movie here was always viewed in such a way. And in this case, I love it also. I expected crap based on the silly cover and the B-comedians who star, despite the presecne of Evil Johnny (aka Patrick Warburton) on it. This had some of the funniest non-seuiturs and throw-away one liners I've heard in a long time. The plot was really fun, and the ending was great!
½ November 10, 2009
A very sweet and original film, fresh performances and a cute story. I was very entertained and found it?s uniqueness refreshing. 6.5/10
½ September 23, 2009
pretty bad. had some bright spots and it tried really hard to be funny but it fell flat
½ September 20, 2009
In one word, 'meh'.

Yet another movie that has a great idea, good cast, but which is ruined by aiming for being overly feel good. They're just screaming "we have heart!" so strongly, and amid pratfalls and the like it just falls short.

It's played off coast am as understood by someone who's never heard it, or known the kind of crazy people it tries to portray. Or just as much someone who's never known an actual scientist.

It's cute, but forgettable. Except for being such a waste of a great cast and idea.
½ September 16, 2009
funny moments, but otherwise a waste of time, imho
½ September 13, 2009
A low grade movie that will bore you till the end!! Don't waste your time...
September 1, 2009
100% Rotten to the core. Worse acting, budget filming, terrible story. Basically the whole thing stinks. Had to turn it off and sit on hold for 30 min to get a refund from Shaw. I spent the 30 min not for the 5.99 refund but so that the film maker didnt get credit for money made on this crap film. - Nathan
January 2, 2008
Page 1 of 2