The Boys Next Door Reviews

  • Oct 03, 2018

    This is a creepy movie starring a young Charlie Sheen. I love the atmosphere and vibe of this film- reminds me of another rather underrated film by the name of Miracle Mile. This is dark movie full of violence and the fact that the leads are such assholes doesn't help. It takes courage to even make a film such as this. You may not like it but it is definitely worth a watch.

    This is a creepy movie starring a young Charlie Sheen. I love the atmosphere and vibe of this film- reminds me of another rather underrated film by the name of Miracle Mile. This is dark movie full of violence and the fact that the leads are such assholes doesn't help. It takes courage to even make a film such as this. You may not like it but it is definitely worth a watch.

  • Mar 23, 2015

    Definitely a period film of the 80s and underground at that. This is not as much a film to admire, but more a film that depicts a social message wrapped up in a cultish presentation. Growing up in the 80s, a guy could almost relate to Sheen's character albeit we hope that friend we know isn't really as psycho as portrayed here.... or are they? All in all, worth the watch - plus ironically due to the low knowledge of this film, most people won't realize it was remade in 2013. That film is called "Girls against Boys". Same thing.

    Definitely a period film of the 80s and underground at that. This is not as much a film to admire, but more a film that depicts a social message wrapped up in a cultish presentation. Growing up in the 80s, a guy could almost relate to Sheen's character albeit we hope that friend we know isn't really as psycho as portrayed here.... or are they? All in all, worth the watch - plus ironically due to the low knowledge of this film, most people won't realize it was remade in 2013. That film is called "Girls against Boys". Same thing.

  • Apr 27, 2014

    Charlie Sheen and Maxwell Caulfield go on a murderous rampage throughout L.A. What's not to like? Cheesy 80's awesomeness!

    Charlie Sheen and Maxwell Caulfield go on a murderous rampage throughout L.A. What's not to like? Cheesy 80's awesomeness!

  • Alex r Super Reviewer
    Apr 24, 2014

    Penelope Spheeris' The Boys Next Door is a pretty good crime thriller starring a young Charlie Sheen in an impressive performance. The film starts off a bit too slow, but steadily builds up to a good final. This is not a perfect picture, but is nonetheless impressive in its acting, storytelling and directing, especially considering that director Spheeris would start making bland films after 1992's comedy classic Wayne's World, along with that film, this among her strongest efforts, and it's a shame her career in the 1990's would suffer the way it did, but at least she managed to make a few good film, and The Boys Next Door is one of them. The film could have been better in some areas, but for what it is, it's a well crafted picture that manages to be riveting from start to finish. If you enjoy a good crime drama, you're sure to enjoy this, it's not a great film, but it's a pleasant time waster for what it's worth. Charlie Sheen was far better as an actor in his younger years, and he displayed a charisma that just lights up the screen. I enjoyed the film for what it was, and though it may seem a bit dated, it still is worth seeing if you enjoy Sheen's early work. I felt that the story was good and that it could have been a bit longer. The biggest issue with this film is that it tries to compress way too much material into a short run time, therefore it falls short of it potential, and it never becomes the crime film that it deserves to be. Despite its imperfections, The Boys Next Door is a well crafted picture that is much better than you would think. But in the end, it could have been a great, memorable picture, nonetheless it's quite entertaining and like I've said, is worth seeing.

    Penelope Spheeris' The Boys Next Door is a pretty good crime thriller starring a young Charlie Sheen in an impressive performance. The film starts off a bit too slow, but steadily builds up to a good final. This is not a perfect picture, but is nonetheless impressive in its acting, storytelling and directing, especially considering that director Spheeris would start making bland films after 1992's comedy classic Wayne's World, along with that film, this among her strongest efforts, and it's a shame her career in the 1990's would suffer the way it did, but at least she managed to make a few good film, and The Boys Next Door is one of them. The film could have been better in some areas, but for what it is, it's a well crafted picture that manages to be riveting from start to finish. If you enjoy a good crime drama, you're sure to enjoy this, it's not a great film, but it's a pleasant time waster for what it's worth. Charlie Sheen was far better as an actor in his younger years, and he displayed a charisma that just lights up the screen. I enjoyed the film for what it was, and though it may seem a bit dated, it still is worth seeing if you enjoy Sheen's early work. I felt that the story was good and that it could have been a bit longer. The biggest issue with this film is that it tries to compress way too much material into a short run time, therefore it falls short of it potential, and it never becomes the crime film that it deserves to be. Despite its imperfections, The Boys Next Door is a well crafted picture that is much better than you would think. But in the end, it could have been a great, memorable picture, nonetheless it's quite entertaining and like I've said, is worth seeing.

  • Oct 03, 2013

    Here's a largely forgotten gem. Penelope Spheeris' follow up to "Suburbia" documents a different type of urban alienation as it follows Maxwell Caulfield and Charlie Sheen as two extremely alienated recent high school graduates who travel to L.A. and commit an escalating series of crimes. A really solid 80s genre flick.

    Here's a largely forgotten gem. Penelope Spheeris' follow up to "Suburbia" documents a different type of urban alienation as it follows Maxwell Caulfield and Charlie Sheen as two extremely alienated recent high school graduates who travel to L.A. and commit an escalating series of crimes. A really solid 80s genre flick.

  • Jun 27, 2013

    Charlie Sheen was so young. Funny he never changed otherwise. His personality fits everything I've seen him in.

    Charlie Sheen was so young. Funny he never changed otherwise. His personality fits everything I've seen him in.

  • Jun 07, 2013

    Two newly graduated high school misfits take a road trip to Los Angeles where they engage in a spree of violence. Sheen and Caufield successfully portray two callous individuals but they don't quite fit the roles as guys who can't make any inroads with Bonnie and her popular friends or get invited to nerdy Joe's party.

    Two newly graduated high school misfits take a road trip to Los Angeles where they engage in a spree of violence. Sheen and Caufield successfully portray two callous individuals but they don't quite fit the roles as guys who can't make any inroads with Bonnie and her popular friends or get invited to nerdy Joe's party.

  • May 20, 2013

    this is one of the most underrated movies there is. so much violence!!!!

    this is one of the most underrated movies there is. so much violence!!!!

  • Jan 23, 2013

    (***): [img]http://images.rottentomatoes.com/images/user/icons/icon14.gif[/img] A very interesting film that is worth seeking out.

    (***): [img]http://images.rottentomatoes.com/images/user/icons/icon14.gif[/img] A very interesting film that is worth seeking out.

  • Jan 06, 2012

    Back When He Only Played Crazy There is a confusion in this movie between spree killers and serial killers. We start with discussion of the latter, but the movie is really about the former. These are not people who have anything in common with, say, David Berkowitz, who is one of the people shown at the beginning. These two are closer to Charles Starkweather, who--with or without the help of his girlfriend, Caril Ann Fugate (depending on which of them you asked)--killed eleven people in two months. Generally, spree killers are less methodical and less likely to kill similar people. Serial killers tend to have a preferred victim and a preferred method of killing. There are insights to be gained from the study of serial killers, but these boys just don't fit into it. This movie is the story of one terrible weekend, and while it's true that the boys were loners and outcasts before the movie starts, but it's equally true that there is no reason to believe they had a body count yet. Roy Alston (Maxwell Caulfield) and Bo Richards (Charlie Sheen) are graduating from some high school in middle-of-nowhere, Arizona. They have never gotten along with their classmates. Bo's grandparents give him two hundred dollars for graduation, and after the boys make a total nuisance of themselves at a classmate's party, they steal his mother's dog and drive to California. Only Los Angeles isn't what they expect--Mythic Los Angeles strikes again--and they decide to make their own fun. This starts with a gas station attendant who angers them by only giving them the gas they pay for; Roy beats him half to death. They hit an old lady with a beer bottle on Venice Beach. They then drive off with several women attacking their car. And on and on, while policemen are left to figure out if the crimes are connected. Which initially they have no reason to expect but which becomes increasingly obvious, given their car. Bo is not a healthy boy, but he would get in far less trouble in the end had he just avoided Roy like everyone else. He strikes me as the sort of person whose life would be improved if he just moved away from where everyone had known him his entire life, somewhere he could teach himself how to be a different person. Maybe if he got a little counseling. Got out of his own head for a while. Bad Influences and Peer Pressure only count for so much, I think; there are some minds that are just more susceptible to that kind of thing, and I think Bo is one of them. When he meets the girl, Angie (Patti D'Arbanville), he realizes that there's a life out there that isn't the one he's always thought he'd be stuck with. He can get out. He can meet girls. He doesn't have to work in a factor and stay in the same small town. And if he had learned that [i]before[/i] he had gone on a crime spree (and probably one which would get him the death penalty), that would have been so much the better for him. Early in the film, Roy tells Bo about the anger he has inside himself. He reminds Bo of a time when he was legitimately angry, when someone damaged the car, and tells him that he himself feels that way all the time. He considers joining the Marines to find an outlet for it, but the recruiter (Leonard O. Turner) knows the sort of questions being asked and says that the Marines are not for him. And indeed they are not; a military organization doesn't want someone who resents taking orders. They don't want loose cannons, and there's only so much inner rage which can be channeled. Bo would not have gotten into anywhere near as much trouble without Roy, but eventually, Roy would have gotten into just as much trouble without Bo. He was a lit fuse. The rules of society not merely didn't apply to him but simply didn't factor into his thought processes. In short, Roy was legally insane. No matter what situation he found himself in, it was only a matter of time, and not much of it, before he killed. That he was half in love with Bo didn't help. Oh, I'm not sure it was scripted that way; certainly one would not currently ask Charlie Sheen to find out. But there is definitely tension between the two, and it helps elevate a cheap exploitation flick into something a little more. Not [i]much[/i] more; this is still a mediocre film at best. (Though it is awfully satisfying when someone gets yelled at for using language which was common and even acceptable in 1985.) It could have been even better had that aspect of their relationship really been explored. After all, those rare killers who work together usually have something complicated and sexual between them. We don't much like to talk about it, because we as a society fear even tamer kinds of alternate sexuality, but the thrill of killing isn't just the kind of thrill the average person gets from, say, a roller coaster. There are more hormones at work than just adrenaline. Though of course, both of these guys are part of a mindset which wouldn't let them admit mutual attraction even if they weren't crazy.

    Back When He Only Played Crazy There is a confusion in this movie between spree killers and serial killers. We start with discussion of the latter, but the movie is really about the former. These are not people who have anything in common with, say, David Berkowitz, who is one of the people shown at the beginning. These two are closer to Charles Starkweather, who--with or without the help of his girlfriend, Caril Ann Fugate (depending on which of them you asked)--killed eleven people in two months. Generally, spree killers are less methodical and less likely to kill similar people. Serial killers tend to have a preferred victim and a preferred method of killing. There are insights to be gained from the study of serial killers, but these boys just don't fit into it. This movie is the story of one terrible weekend, and while it's true that the boys were loners and outcasts before the movie starts, but it's equally true that there is no reason to believe they had a body count yet. Roy Alston (Maxwell Caulfield) and Bo Richards (Charlie Sheen) are graduating from some high school in middle-of-nowhere, Arizona. They have never gotten along with their classmates. Bo's grandparents give him two hundred dollars for graduation, and after the boys make a total nuisance of themselves at a classmate's party, they steal his mother's dog and drive to California. Only Los Angeles isn't what they expect--Mythic Los Angeles strikes again--and they decide to make their own fun. This starts with a gas station attendant who angers them by only giving them the gas they pay for; Roy beats him half to death. They hit an old lady with a beer bottle on Venice Beach. They then drive off with several women attacking their car. And on and on, while policemen are left to figure out if the crimes are connected. Which initially they have no reason to expect but which becomes increasingly obvious, given their car. Bo is not a healthy boy, but he would get in far less trouble in the end had he just avoided Roy like everyone else. He strikes me as the sort of person whose life would be improved if he just moved away from where everyone had known him his entire life, somewhere he could teach himself how to be a different person. Maybe if he got a little counseling. Got out of his own head for a while. Bad Influences and Peer Pressure only count for so much, I think; there are some minds that are just more susceptible to that kind of thing, and I think Bo is one of them. When he meets the girl, Angie (Patti D'Arbanville), he realizes that there's a life out there that isn't the one he's always thought he'd be stuck with. He can get out. He can meet girls. He doesn't have to work in a factor and stay in the same small town. And if he had learned that [i]before[/i] he had gone on a crime spree (and probably one which would get him the death penalty), that would have been so much the better for him. Early in the film, Roy tells Bo about the anger he has inside himself. He reminds Bo of a time when he was legitimately angry, when someone damaged the car, and tells him that he himself feels that way all the time. He considers joining the Marines to find an outlet for it, but the recruiter (Leonard O. Turner) knows the sort of questions being asked and says that the Marines are not for him. And indeed they are not; a military organization doesn't want someone who resents taking orders. They don't want loose cannons, and there's only so much inner rage which can be channeled. Bo would not have gotten into anywhere near as much trouble without Roy, but eventually, Roy would have gotten into just as much trouble without Bo. He was a lit fuse. The rules of society not merely didn't apply to him but simply didn't factor into his thought processes. In short, Roy was legally insane. No matter what situation he found himself in, it was only a matter of time, and not much of it, before he killed. That he was half in love with Bo didn't help. Oh, I'm not sure it was scripted that way; certainly one would not currently ask Charlie Sheen to find out. But there is definitely tension between the two, and it helps elevate a cheap exploitation flick into something a little more. Not [i]much[/i] more; this is still a mediocre film at best. (Though it is awfully satisfying when someone gets yelled at for using language which was common and even acceptable in 1985.) It could have been even better had that aspect of their relationship really been explored. After all, those rare killers who work together usually have something complicated and sexual between them. We don't much like to talk about it, because we as a society fear even tamer kinds of alternate sexuality, but the thrill of killing isn't just the kind of thrill the average person gets from, say, a roller coaster. There are more hormones at work than just adrenaline. Though of course, both of these guys are part of a mindset which wouldn't let them admit mutual attraction even if they weren't crazy.