Beginning of the End - Movie Reviews - Rotten Tomatoes

Beginning of the End Reviews

Page 1 of 3
Super Reviewer
January 9, 2018
Watching some of the old MST3K episodes available for streaming on Hulu and Netflix (there is a different random selection on each platform). Whether it is Joel or Mike watching these awful movies with the bots I do not envy their torture. Their snarky comments add some entertainment value, but my ratings are based on the movie's quality itself and not the commentary broadcast from the satellite of love. Another one by Bert I. Gordon. A scientist (the stiff Peter Graves) invents giant vegetables to solve a food shortage, but when grasshoppers nibble the engineered food they grow huge too. A lady journalist (Peggie Castle) tags along to track the story as military help is sought. Like the 50s version of War of the Worlds from four years before the military is a mighty savior though they have limits and the scientist must use a bit of knowledge to fool the giant bugs in the end.
Super Reviewer
½ October 25, 2015
Back in 1957 the preferred acting called for sort of a documentary style staccato monotone delivery and the cast delivers just that in this Nature Gone Wrong crapfest as grasshoppers eat nuclear treated veggies and become giant sized themselves, deciding to invade Chicago! Its all in fun, but fun played straight as 1957 could get it. Watching this I wondered that perhaps swarms of cannibal locusts would've made a better movie, but that's just me dreaming out loud.
Super Reviewer
September 7, 2015
Still in the year of 1957, the year of the sci-fi thriller it seems. Its pretty clear to see that this movie came to be purely from the success of 'Them!' which revolved around killer ants. Although I really have no idea which giant bug movie was thought up first from the vast array of clones. Considering this is about giant locusts/grasshoppers, which are hardly terrifying really, leaves me to think this may have been all that was left to utilise after the obvious bugs like scorpions, mantis, slug-things etc...were all in production.

So what's this all about you say? well let me see. A small town with all its inhabitants vanish, well the people vanish, the town is destroyed. Onto the case stumbles a young attractive journalist who smells a rat and starts to poke around. After much dialog and wondering around from place to place we finally meet up with the good looking Dr Wainwright who is experimenting with radiation on crops to make them bigger. Hmmm I wonder if this has anything to do with it. Why yes! low and behold grasshoppers managed to eat some of the infected crops and now they are as big as a barn. Standard procedure then requires that the army (national guard) be brought in to try and stop the giant bugs, which of course proves ineffective. Thusly we are draw into a tense situation as Dr Wainwright and his attractive journalist partner must come up with a devious plan to stop the mutant hordes.

Basically this is a complete rerun of 'Them!' only with much worse effects. The actors are merely props for the movies giant bugs which clamber around over awkward models. The funny thing is, the giant bugs don't actually turn up for ages! not until the 27 minute mark. Up until that point the acting is actually pretty good strangely enough, you'd think this was a proper suspense movie. Both Peter Graves and Peggie Castle are very engaging in their respective roles. I wasn't sure which way Graves's character would go to be honest, kinda thought he might be some kind of loony scientist villain for a time. Castle of course does everything a woman would do in a 1950's B-movie, scream and look pretty, but she is also quite a strong character when it comes down to it. The only other character that stuck was Morris Ankrum as Gen. Hanson who came across as the stereotypical gruff military type with a buzz haircut, almost like a Jonah Jameson type character.

Once the giant bugs appear everything goes downhill terribly I can't lie. Basically what they've done is enlarged rear projection footage of real grasshoppers against the live action of the actors. This, of course, is nothing unusual in these type of movies (every driving scene ever!), but the fact that the footage is clearly real grasshoppers makes it ridiculously stupid. In other scenes they have used traveling matte effects as the bugs shuffle across live action footage of the actors, again looking awful and disjointed. But the worst has to be the cheap-ass visual effect of having the hoppers crawling on a large photo of a building...and pretending its a real building. Its actually a real eye-opener because you can clearly tell its a photo. There are one or two model shots of Chicago when the bugs attack the city, but again its so very obvious, clearly tiny bugs bumping into models.

Its not all bad though, the action is quite intense at times when the actors break out the big guns and machine guns, blasting away at nothing. You could almost be fooled into thinking you're watching a gritty war flick at times. Sadly that's all though as nothing much else happens here, you don't see any form of death or attacks or anything. Every time a hopper is about to eat someone the matted hopper just moves over them and it cuts away, there is no destruction or carnage at all which makes it hard to engage in the fantasy. I'm not expecting blood and gore of course but you can tell that they weren't able to do anything due to budget limitations and the fact the hoppers were matted on top. There is never any life size models/puppets of the hoppers to interact with the actors. Don't even get me started on the finale where they drown all the hoppers, clearly real hoppers filmed in a small tube of water.

I think the most interesting aspect of the whole movie is the stock footage, of which there is a lot used. There is of course lots of footage of the military in action, training wise and real war time stuff (I'm guessing), which is interesting to see...for obvious reasons really. Other stock footage shows in and around 1950's Chicago which was also pretty cool I thought, amazing to see the changes.

Now I did enjoy this but mainly for hilarious reasons. Its not exactly the same as other bug B-movies, for instance there was no smartly dressed, old fashioned, crusty old scientist guy who knows everything, and they don't kill the bugs with any weapons here, they just use their ingenuity. Errr...but that's about it, every other cliche is here from the screaming female to the gruff military dude, and of course the movies poster is awesome but doesn't represent the movie whatsoever. This definitely comes under the 'so bad its good' banner I think, hokey effects, cookie cutter plot, but decent acting amazingly.
May 23, 2014
So Worst and so good at the same time.
November 16, 2013
The Beginning of the End is such a great title because once the movie starts you'll wish it was the beginning of the end (at least that's how I remember feeling at the time). It's just another movie in a long line of bad 1950's atomic bug movies. They're supposed to be locusts, but the people in the movie can't decide whether or not they're actually grasshoppers or locusts. Oh well, it doesn't matter all that much because what they are is not the point. The point is that giant bugs try to take over the world after they've been mutated by radiation. You know, the usual plot of these things. The effects are a mixed bag. Sometimes they work and sometimes they're just terrible, and don't hold up at all. I highly recommend the Mystery Science Theater 3000 version of the movie, by the way. It's much more enjoyable.
September 5, 2012
This was a very enjoyable movie, maybe not the best effects I've ever seen; but this was classic 50's monster brilliance! Giant Grasshoppers taking over the world, what an absolutely genial idea, no one would consider creating a movie like this today! I've seen my share of monster movies and this one can compete with the best of the worst! Definitely worth the watch!
½ March 31, 2012
One of the worst films of all time only to be made watchable with the assistance of people making fun of it.
½ March 21, 2012
The story is a bit interesting, but the effects can be pretty cheap in some shots and the film goes nowhere near the beginning of the end. Decent characters but none too interesting. Best if watched on MST3K.
½ December 21, 2011
Central Illinois attacked by giant locusts. Basically just a novelty for people from Ludlow to hear their town mentioned about every 30 seconds for the first half hour of this movie. Other than that, for a 1957 monster movie this is awful. No excuse for how crappy it is considering the other monster films of the time.
December 13, 2011
I actually should have watched the MST3K version of this to heighten my enjoyment but a giant grasshopper flix but I can take my own piss out of it just fine. 4th rate on all accounts mostly due to its outlandish animal gone amuck concept w/ some awful special effects. Thousands of grasshoppers? Really? Then Chicago should have been crushed under the weight of them. There were never more then a half a dozen or so on screen @ the same time. This movie is completely void of logic even though it tries to explain everything away. Shaking your head until your pea brain rattles around in your head like a bean in a can won't help..drinking does though
½ October 25, 2011
Bert I. Gordon, will you ever learn?
Super Reviewer
½ July 3, 2011
Another giant bug movie, with a few scenes very reminiscent of Them!. Gordon is my least favourite sci-fi horror director, his movies aren't so bad that they're good, they're just plain bad. The special effects are so simple a kid could have made them, the acting is bad, the story is lacking and full of holes. I wouldn't recommend this movie.
April 28, 2011
I've heard it said that if you've seen one giant monster or nature run amuck movie, you've seen them all. I'm not sure about that, but I do feel safe in saying that if you've seen one Bert I Gordon movie, you've seen them all. Who's that, you say. Bert I Gordon, aka Mr. B.I.G., was a somewhat prolific B-movie director from the fifties through the seventies, rather in the same vein as Roger Corman.
But while Mr. Corman worked mainly for American International Pictures, and directed all manner of low-budget offerings, Gordon worked for whatever studio would hire him, and had a more specialized niche: movies about giant creatures. He did endless variations on this theme; giant ants in Empire of the Ants, prehistoric beasts in King Dinosaur, giant rats and wasps in Food of the Gods, out of control teenage giants in Village of the Giants, and giant locusts in this film, Beginning of the End.
Another difference between Corman and Gordon was their production values. Corman usually had low budgets to work with, necessitating the use of flimsy models, cheap monster suits, second rate production facilities, and a fair amount of stock footage. The budgets of Gordon's films on the other hand were virtually nonexistent, forcing him to rely on improvised sound stages in offices or vacant warehouses, practically endless stock footage, and severe overuse of rear projection shots. This is where you place the actors in front of a screen, onto which you project the giant monsters they're supposed to be fighting or running from.
I've already mentioned that this movie is about giant locusts. These locusts became giant because they ate giant vegetables that were created using radioactive isotopes as part of Department of Agriculture experiment run by Peter Graves. Now based on his later work in movies like Airplane! I still believe him to be a decent actor who got a bad rap. But I admit that seeing the number of Z-grade movies like this that he's appeared in, it's pretty easy to see how he acquired that bad rap. But I digress. As a side effect of their rapid growth, the locusts have become ravenous, and carnivorous. And so, after destroying a small town and eating Graves's lab assistant, they attack Chicago and do battle with the United States army.
As befitting the nonexistent budget, the special effects are equally nonexistent. The small town that they destroyed before the start of the movie looks suspiciously like it was hit by a tornado. And in every scene with the locusts, it painfully obvious that they're just regular grasshoppers who have been shoddily edited into footage of the actors. Much of the film consists of grasshoppers wandering through battle footage from previous war movies and newsreels. If you look closely you can actually see them walking through the tanks and guns. The handful of extras in soldier's uniforms do their part, firing into the air and backing away in terror, but when their eaten, it's always just off-screen.
And for the ultimate in cinematic penny-pinching, look no further than the scenes of locusts climbing Chicago's most famous buildings. Anyone with good eyesight will quickly realize that what the locusts are climbing is actually postcards of famous Chicago buildings. At one point a grasshopper even walks off into thin air- and they still put the shot in the movie. These people weren't even trying. And then there's the rather anti-climactic climax, in which the locusts are lured into Lake Michigan and drown. It's just footage of grasshoppers swarming across stock footage of Grant Park, and then a close up of dead grasshoppers bobbing around in water.
The only thing that saves this movie from complete awfulness is the bad laughs generated whenever the locusts appear on screen. Even this would probably have gotten old after awhile if I hadn't been watching the Mystery Science Theatre 3000 version. If there was ever a movie that was meant to be mocked, this is it. I would highly MST3K episode to fans of the series or anyone looking for some laughs. As for the original, I can only recommend it for curing insomnia. Trust me, you'll be out cold from boredom long before the first locust appears.
½ September 13, 2010
Better then average small-animal-grown-to-enourmous-size sci flick. Peter Graves and Peggie Castle try to save Chicago from a huge onslaught of attacking grasshoppers. Although the reasoning for these large beasts is flimsy (and the film totally sidesteps the issue that Graves could be held responsible) it does hold up well in the special effects department. The Hoopers look superimposed, and the special effects crew, with some exceptions, did a pretty good job of making them look menacing, All in all, reccomended for someone looking for these type of films.
½ December 20, 2009
The grasshoppers are moving towards the postcard! AAAAHHHHH! Oh and Illinois has mountains. Can we save central illinois from the giant grasshoppers? Or are they locusts? AHHHHHHHHHHH!!!
½ February 13, 2009
I'm surprised, given the era the movie was released, that it wasn't titled Attack of the Giant Grasshoppers, or something similar. Probably because people wouldn't have gone to see it. It sucked either way.
½ December 2, 2008
Giant grasshoppers attack Chicago. Kewel
October 7, 2008
Hilariously awful, but giant grasshoppers are still pretty cool.
July 30, 2008
Pretty decent monster flick (I'm Peter Graves) But a perfect MST3K movie (I'm Peter Graves)
½ July 7, 2008
Giant locusts (cleverly disguised as Giant Grasshoppers!) ravage the downstate Illinois towns of Paxton and Chebanse! Can the Illinois National Guard stop them before they reach Chicago? (The Illinois National Guard couldn't stop the Blues Brothers! What chance have they against giant locusts????) Peter Graves in a Impossible Mission before his days on Mission Impossible!
Page 1 of 3