Little Women - Movie Reviews - Rotten Tomatoes

Little Women Reviews

Page 1 of 2
Philip Martin
Arkansas Democrat-Gazette
March 11, 2004
| Original Score: 2/5
Alex Sandell
Juicy Cerebellum
August 12, 2003
A little sappy.
| Original Score: 2/5
Steve Rhodes
Internet Reviews
January 1, 2000
The characters are two dimensional stick figures. They do absolutely no wrong.
Full Review | Original Score: 1.5/4
Top Critic
Roger Ebert
Chicago Sun-Times
January 1, 2000
Little Women grew on me.
Full Review | Original Score: 3.5/4
Top Critic
James Berardinelli
January 1, 2000
It's the performances ... that make this movie special.
Full Review | Original Score: 3/4
Nell Minow
Movie Mom at Yahoo! Movies
August 7, 2003
Devoted and lovely retelling of the classic story.
| Original Score: 4/5
Top Critic
Todd McCarthy
May 27, 2008
An outstanding version of Louisa May Alcott's perennial, one that surpasses even the best previous rendition, George Cukor's 1933 outing starring Katharine Hepburn.
Kit Bowen
January 30, 2004
| Original Score: 3/5
Mark R. Leeper
January 1, 2000
The sixth filming may well rank as the most beautiful and compelling version, though certainly some will still prefer George Cukor's classic 1933 version.
Full Review | Original Score: high +1 out of -4..+4
Christopher Null
January 1, 2000
The story of Little Women is given a new breath of life with this film, and it is still as relevant about our place in the world and overcoming its man-made obstacles as it was when it was written.
| Original Score: 4/5
Top Critic
Geoff Andrew
Time Out
February 9, 2006
Be prepared, however, for a large beaker of the milk of human kindness.
Jeffrey Westhoff
Northwest Herald (Crystal Lake, IL)
February 17, 2003
| Original Score: 3/5
Frederic and Mary Ann Brussat
Spirituality and Practice
August 26, 2002
Vibrant and appealing screen interpretation of Louis May Alcott's classic story about family as an evolving energy field of love.
Top Critic
Richard Schickel
TIME Magazine
January 1, 2000
Director Gillian Armstrong and writer Robin Swicord have fashioned an entrancing film from this distinctly unfashionable classic.
Top Critic
Lisa Schwarzbaum
Entertainment Weekly
September 7, 2011
Full Review | Original Score: A
Dragan Antulov
September 18, 2002
Despite good casting, interesting sets and costumes and Armstrong's good direction, the viewers still might feel somewhat cheated -- instead of an interesting period piece they received ordinary melodrama.
Full Review| Original Score: 7/10
Shellie Iliff
Palo Alto Weekly
May 20, 2003
| Original Score: 3.5/4
Jonathan R. Perry
Tyler Morning Telegraph (Texas)
July 15, 2005
| Original Score: 5/5
Top Critic
John Hartl
January 1, 2000
This time Winona Ryder plays Jo, and she is radiant.
David Parkinson
Empire Magazine
January 1, 2000
While adherents of the original will carp at some anachronistic themes, few will quibble about the quality of the performances.
Page 1 of 2