The Arrival - Movie Reviews - Rotten Tomatoes

The Arrival Reviews

Page 1 of 2
Mark R. Leeper
rec.arts.movies.reviews
January 1, 2000
Full Review | Original Score: high 0 out of -4..+4
Christopher Null
Filmcritic.com
January 1, 2000
The Arrival is part sci-fi action flick, part conspiracy thriller, and all preposterous nonsense.
| Original Score: 2.5/5
Rob Blackwelder
SPLICEDWire
January 1, 2000
"The Arrival" is a good 20 minutes too long and heavy with useless scenes in which we learn far too much about Sheen's relationship with his girlfriend.
Full Review | Original Score: 1/4
David N. Butterworth
rec.arts.movies.reviews
January 1, 2000
It's like "Stakeout" with a glossier Sheen.
Full Review | Original Score: 2.5/4
Top Critic
Lisa Schwarzbaum
Entertainment Weekly
May 31, 1996
[Sheen] spends most of the movie in a kind of sweaty apoplexy that makes one worry for his health.
Full Review | Original Score: D
Chuck O'Leary
FulvueDrive-in.com
October 14, 2005
You know a movie's in trouble when it's called The Arrival and nothing arrives -- the film's aliens are already here.
Read More | Original Score: 2/5
Madeleine Williams
Cinematter
January 1, 2000
Full Review | Original Score: 2.5/4
Top Critic
Susan Stark
Detroit News
January 1, 2000
Read More | Original Score: 2/4
Chris Hicks
Deseret News, Salt Lake City
January 1, 2000
No logic, little character development and a thin story that is supposed to be compensated for by startling effects.
Barbara Shulgasser
San Francisco Examiner
January 1, 2000
A hokey summer entertainment that is full of big machinery, satellite dishes du jour, long embarrassing close-ups and gaps in logic through which large UFOs could hurtle.
Frank Swietek
One Guy's Opinion
March 1, 2004
| Original Score: 2/5
Emanuel Levy
EmanuelLevy.Com
August 12, 2005
Read More | Original Score: 2/5
Top Critic
Roger Ebert
Chicago Sun-Times
January 1, 2000
The movie is as smart as ``Mission: Impossible'' is dumb.
Full Review | Original Score: 3.5/4
Top Critic
James Berardinelli
ReelViews
January 1, 2000
This is not a dumb movie; in fact, with its heavy reliance upon real science, it's startlingly credible.
Full Review | Original Score: 3/4
Top Critic
Geoff Andrew
Time Out
February 9, 2006
What it lacks in sophistication (everything), it partly makes up for in sheer gall.
Jeffrey Westhoff
Northwest Herald (Crystal Lake, IL)
February 17, 2003
| Original Score: 3/5
Top Critic
Stephen Holden
New York Times
January 1, 2000
A movie that shoehorns a blunt warning into its silly but entertaining story of a young radio astronomer's one-man battle against sinister extraterrestrials.
Top Critic
Mick LaSalle
San Francisco Chronicle
June 18, 2002
It's a strong, lean piece of writing that moves quickly. Nothing is wasted, and nothing happens the way you'd expect.
Full Review | Original Score: 3/4
David Nusair
Reel Film Reviews
September 25, 2002
...it ultimately seems apparent that the movie would've been well-served had it topped out at 90 minutes (ie it's too long and feels it).
Full Review | Original Score: 2.5/4
Dragan Antulov
rec.arts.movies.reviews
June 4, 2003
Full Review| Original Score: 7/10
Page 1 of 2