Forgot your password?
Don't have an account? Sign up here
Got more questions about news letters?
Already have an account? Log in here
and the Terms and Policies,
and to receive email from Rotten Tomatoes and Fandango.
Please enter your email address and we will email you a new password.
We encourage our community to report abusive content and/ or spam. Our team will review flagged items and determine whether or not they meet our community guidelines.
Please choose best explanation for why you are flagging this review.
Thank you for your submission. This post has been submitted for our review.
Sincerely, The Rotten Tomatoes Team
i thought that this movie was pretty good because Christopher Reeves played a good role most people wont agree but i havent seen the original film but yeah
The acting is bad, for a thriller the suspense is not well executed. Overall the film feel extremely lazy.
one if Christopher Reeves best movies
I ran into this on Netflix, a movie starring Daryl Hannah and Christopher Reeve after his paralyzing accident. In it, Reeve's optimism, drive, and work ethic shine through. I think he enjoyed making this. Hannah's character is a balanced counterpart to Reeve.
It's a suspenseful remake of an earlier film that I don't recall seeing. His condition no doubt led to numerous script changes, making it more his own.
Overall, the storyline works, although it's perhaps a bit slow at times. It picks up toward the end as Jason Kemp comes face to face in a harrowing confrontation with a killer that he's been stalking turning the tables to stalk him.
If you want to catch another glimpse of the now departed Reeve, formerly Superman back in the 70s and 80s, here you go.
It wasn't expected to achieve Hitchcock's mastery, but it delivers the thrills while offering a new twist in the middle of the modern update, even if it's shorter and slightly less-focused towards a mostly resolving end. Also, what really adds into the thrilling fear is Christopher Reeves' fragile, real-life condition that deepens the reality of the classic and showing that he still performs fine with the same charisma. So basically, it's a good benefitting remake that's a little less to the original. (B+)
(Full review TBD)
This was never going to be a patch on the original and it is weak overall but an interesting ending just about saves this TV version of Hitchcock's classic from being a complete disaster.
While maybe not as good as the original, CHRISTOPHER REEVE gives a better performance than most actors today. A shining achievement!
Its a brave move to remake Hitchcock, and for the most part this succeeds, far better than Van Sant's Psycho remake. Whilst sticking to the basic premise of Hitch's original this version at least attempts to do something different it and plays to Reeve's strengths. With solid support from Hannah and Forster, its just a shame that the filmmakers didn't try to raise the bar a little more as this looks and feels like a TV movie, so whilst not the classic that the original is there are worse ways to spend an hour and a half.
Decent reworking if the Hitchcock classic doesn't have the wit and humor the original had.
Christopher Reeve is legitimately excellent in this remake of the Alfred Hitchcock classic, but he's the only great thing in it. While the screenplay tries to play around with the basic building blocks of the original's plot, it eventual devolves into a straight rehash, one done with none of the cinematic virtuosity that Hitchcock's original had in spades. Not an atrocity like the PSYCHO remake, and fans of Reeve should check it out, but it's entirely mediocre.