Diamonds - Movie Reviews - Rotten Tomatoes

Diamonds Reviews

Page 1 of 2
January 1, 2000
Simply a pleasure.
Read More | Original Score: 8/10
January 1, 2000
A thoroughly enjoyable piece.
January 1, 2000
Kirk Douglas is still the champ.
Full Review | Original Score: 3.5/5
January 1, 2000
Douglas, still vigorous at 83, carries the film with one of the best performances of his long career, probably because many of his scenes are straight from the heart.
January 1, 2000
The star's courageous performance is the main attraction of a movie that shamelessly pours on the sentiment.
Read More | Original Score: 3.5/5
January 1, 2000
In technique, Diamonds is rather placid.
Read More | Original Score: 67/100
January 1, 2000
Full Review | Original Score: 3/5
January 1, 2000
Douglas, always one of Hollywood's most vigorous actors, still commands the screen as Harry.
Read More | Original Score: 2/4
January 1, 2000
A thoroughly enjoyable piece.
September 7, 2011
Full Review | Original Score: D
August 9, 2007
A sub-par effort in family drama with Kirk Douglas barely registering above his usual excellence
Read More | Original Score: 2/5
July 22, 2005
Read More | Original Score: 2/5
June 7, 2003
Douglas struggles honorably with his stoke-impaired speech and a shoddy story.
| Original Score: 1/5
June 18, 2002
Read More | Original Score: 1.5/4
May 19, 2002
Inappropriate for audiences of all ages.
April 3, 2002
Read More | Original Score: D
June 15, 2001
I have to admit I shed some sentimental tears during the movie, so it's not really very bad at all, but it could have used a script polish.
Full Review| Original Score: 3.5
January 1, 2000
Sadly, Kirk Douglas' real-life stroke is the most compelling ingredient in Miramax's new cobbled-together caper flick.
January 1, 2000
Even in his prime, Douglas couldn't have saved himself from this cliche-ridden script.
Page 1 of 2