Reviews

Jan 16, 2020
Even though I didn't approach it with a genre fan's enthusiasm, I will allow that this remake offers its share of scares.
Jan 16, 2020
My advice: If you have four hours to spare, spend it reading the book.
Jan 16, 2020
The presentation of the story just doesn't seem fresh. The familiarity may appeal to King fans, but those expecting an innovative take on a classic vampire tale will be disappointed.
Jan 16, 2020
The first five minutes of "Salem's Lot" are great. Well, four minutes. And then Lowe's voice-over kicks in, which essentially starts the poison drip. It's a lot of King-speak, which is annoying and so formulaic it ought to be patented (and might be).
Jan 16, 2020
It's just not particularly scary. Which is a problem for what's supposed to be a horror film
Jan 16, 2020
In the lavish visuals, acrobatic vampires prowl ceilings and expire with ferocious flourishes... Those images should satisfy moviegoers who can't get enough visual magic at the multiplex. But great acting serves the show better in the long run.
Jan 16, 2020
TNT's four-hour miniseries boasts fine performances, exceptional photography and all the other bells and whistles that mark a great show.
Jan 16, 2020
It develops psychological complexity and a fullness of character that is usually in King's books but rarely makes the transition to screen.
Jan 16, 2020
The script of ''Salem's Lot'' does justice to the mini-series's effects.
Apr 29, 2009
A horrible remake to a classic horror film...
Oct 22, 2004
Better than the original. You know what? You'll actually want to sit through this one
Apr 24, 2004