Chapter 27 Reviews

Page 1 of 2
August 22, 2018
It does give a sense of disturbance, but after a while it gets irritating, as much of it is repetitive without either developing the story or adding significance.
November 16, 2011
November 16, 2011
October 18, 2008
October 18, 2008
Despite all his obvious effort and admirable Stanislavskian immersion, his Chapman is pure cinematic affectation, a compendium of great movie madmen of the past.
July 12, 2008
The eternal question of why Chapman shot Lennon is not answered. And that's probably because there IS no real reason.
April 25, 2008
his drama, about the three days leading up to the murder, never overcomes its inherent ghoulishness, largely because Chapman, like so many mentally ill people, is a huge bore.
April 25, 2008
Chapter 27 just makes you feel bad for, and about, everybody -- including the wretched souls who made the thing.
April 24, 2008
Imagine hanging out in the head of a psychotic, indefensible loser for 80 minutes and getting nothing worth remembering or admiring in return.
April 21, 2008
Despite the subject, the script is flat. Despite using the real locations, the production looked cheesy. Finally, the decision to strip Mark David Chapman (John Lennon's killer) of any humanity makes the narrative decidedly one note.
April 18, 2008
Stop the madness and please avoid this film at all costs.
April 14, 2008
The film manages to be entirely about Mark David Chapman without saying a single insightful thing about him.
April 11, 2008
If [director] Schaefer's intent was to provide some sort of insight into Chapman's character, some hint of explanation for this senseless tragedy, he fails, probably because there's none to be found beyond one lonely guy's addled brain chemistry.
April 4, 2008
There are cheesy special effects and even cheesier gags, and the schmaltz eventually piles on neck-deep.
April 4, 2008
It's a train-wreck turn in a dreary movie about a self-pitying loser responsible for murdering a beloved pop icon.
April 3, 2008
[Leto's] mumbled voiceover may perfectly reflect Chapman's inner world. [But] who wants to enter that world? Neither Chapman ... nor his inner life is very interesting ... I was looking at my watch before the first third of the movie had passed.
April 3, 2008
A study guide for celebrity bodyguards.
March 28, 2008
If there is any good reason for an audience to spend an hour and a half wallowing in the psychotic reveries of this wayward young man, the filmmakers and their star have sadly failed to provide it.
March 28, 2008
However much objectivity the filmmakers try to bring to it, there is an inescapable element of glorification of thoroughly reprehensible characters.
March 28, 2008
The film's 85 minutes drag by painfully slowly, because there's no respite from Chapman's tedious, self-pitying reveries.
Page 1 of 2