Bunt. Delo Litvinenko (Poisoned by Polonium: The Litvinenko File) (Rebellion: The Litvinenko Case) - Movie Reviews - Rotten Tomatoes

Bunt. Delo Litvinenko (Poisoned by Polonium: The Litvinenko File) (Rebellion: The Litvinenko Case) Reviews

Page 1 of 1
December 25, 2014
Gripping, insightful but horrific.
½ August 30, 2010
so boring, all in subtitles. too much russian. That would not be in itself bad it just didn't have a clear topic and couldn't keep focus. wanted to know about the guy who was poisoned. Not about the whole history of Russia after the fall of communism, and war crimes in Chechnia.
July 7, 2010
อ?มริ?า???รอ???ย?รรษั?ยั?ษ??ห?? สยาม?ระ??ศ???รอ???ยอำมา?ย? ?ี????รอ???ย?รร??อมมิว?ิส?? รัส??ีย?ห?ือ?ว?า?ั??หม????รอ???ยอา??า?ร.......
March 16, 2010
Must have for everyone interested in Russia. And for the others as well, to see that this country is governed by criminals.
Super Reviewer
½ September 19, 2009
"Poisoned by Polonium: The Litvinenko File" is an eye-opening documentary that starts with the poisoning of Alexander Litvinenko, a former FSB agent who blew the whistle on corruption and violence in the FSB and moved to London for political asylum. Documentarian Andrei Nekrasov is in a unique position to comment on the case as he had previously befriended Litvinenko and had interviewed him on film on more than one occasion, giving an inside look at the power structure of Russia. Aside from this testimony, there is a string of circumstantial evidence linking a disturbing chain of events starting with the bombing of an apartment building in Moscow in 1999 that killed over 100 people and where the bodies of two FSB officers were found. The powers that be used this as a rationale for the murderous invasion of Chechnya and a subsequential crackdown on dissent that included the murder of journalists including Anna Politkovskaya. So while Russia has the democratic facade that make it and its former president Vladimir Putin attractive to western leaders, the reality could not be more different. In other words, new boss, same as the old boss.
April 20, 2009
I'm giving this film a much higher rating than it deserves because I think that the subject matter is extremely important. The movie alleges a number of disturbingly plausible claims in the name of Litvinenko which the free world continues to be grossly negligent at verifying or disproving. Bottom line: the film asserts that Putin is the real deal--essentially a tyrant, brought to power via an FSB staged war in which he could show how "decisive" and "strong" he is by murdering many hundreds of civilians in the name of "Russia." All the while he is steeped in hundreds of millions of dollars of racketeered dollars that he has been amassing at least since the early 90s. Anyone who speaks out against him and has a chance of being heard is murdered. And no one can really investigate anything because he's the head of state--not only politically but also the head of a large network of criminal agents who control every level of power in Russia.

As a film, I thought it was really weak. The cinematography was "artistic" but it was unclear to what degree that "artisticness" contributed to the overall message of the film. The information and the allegations were presented in a scattered and incoherent manner which gave them some short term emotional impact but made it hard to figure out what exactly the director was trying to say. The film was criticized as being "too emotional" but I think that the "emotional" part was sorely lacking. Intellectually, it is chilling and compelling. But the use of shocking imagery and inflammatory rhetoric caused a very strong "anti" reaction--at least on my part. If the facts speak for themselves, why do we need pictures of maimed Chechen babies? Why do we need a long scene of a stripper to show us what capitalism is? Why do we need to be shown SO MANY charred corpses? After watching this film, you can't help but be indignant about the world's naive acceptance of the current Russian regime but you lack too much feeling for Litvinenko and the others killed by Putin's henchmen.

It seems to me that the film had a perfect opportunity to deeply humanize this issue as well as presenting the case against Putin however they wanted to. In my opinion they blew it on both counts. So I recommend that everyone watch this film but don't expect it to work all that well as a film or to tell you the whole story.
March 11, 2009
I think Litvinenko and Politkovska were both heroes for the Russia. But the sad thing is that the majority dont know anything about their fight for the truth and justice. God bless them.
December 22, 2008
I got chills watching this movie. It was brave of Andrei Nekrasov to make this movie happen.
October 24, 2008
There's something rotten in Russia ...
October 7, 2008
tea? no thanks... fascinating to watch and frightening.
½ September 2, 2008
A film about horrible things happening in Russia that is important to know about but too emotional and confused
½ August 20, 2008
Sin duda hace revelaciones que dejan a Putin y a los servicios secretos de Rusia en muy mal lugar -aunque no creo que nadie se sorprenda...-, pero da una imagen de Litvinenko demasiado idealizada. Es un documental necesario, pero me parecen mejores los de Michael Moore.
August 15, 2008
Very interesting topic but agree that too much info makes it lack coherence...subject matter still amazing to watch...
½ August 2, 2008
A very dense documentary that tackles too wide a range of issues surrounding the Livinenko case.

Much of this also seems a self-promotional effort for the director.
½ July 1, 2008
Kraftig angrep på Putin og et Russland som virker helt ute av kontroll. Engasjerende og skremmende dokumentar som muligens blir for subjektiv og personkritisk for norske TV-kanaler. Noen burde uansett gi denne en bred distribusjon. En viktig film.
June 26, 2008
I am not much of a fan of documentaries.
June 26, 2008
learned abt the case in class!
Page 1 of 1