The LEGO Movie 2: The Second Part
The Walking Dead
Log in with Facebook
Forgot your password?
Don't have an account? Sign up here
and the Terms and Policies,
and to receive email from Rotten Tomatoes and Fandango.
Already have an account? Log in here
Please enter your email address and we will email you a new password.
We want to hear what you have to say but need to verify your account. Just leave us a message here and we will work on getting you verified.
Please reference “Error Code 2121” when contacting customer service.
No consensus yet.
All Critics (8)
| Top Critics (2)
| Fresh (6)
| Rotten (2)
| DVD (1)
Possessed camerawork, elliptical editing, and a discordantly playful score (by Ennio Morricone!) conspire against viewers and establish this as one of Argento's most suspenseful efforts.
self-conscious and silly, but directed with such manipulative panache that you too will feel as if you are being strung along by a deranged, sadistic puppetmaster... there are images here that will burn themselves right onto your retina.
Exposes a reality made increasingly opaque by mania, technology, sexual tumult
As whodunits go, this is more of a "who cares". But as a work of celluloid skill, Four Flies on Grey Velvet has no equal. It's a great, great film.
While the slight story and gore factor rate low, the Argento style is in full flourish. ... Four Flies on Grey Velvet is worthy of all the nostalgic buzz.
As far as Argento films go, none come weirder than the little-seen Four Flies on Grey Velvet.
Third directorial effort from Dario Argento is a good Giallo horror film, but it is a bit less focused than his previous two works. I felt that with this one, Argento didn't deliver anything truly memorable, which is disappointing. The film is still good, but lacks anything to really get your attention. The cast are good in their parts and the direction is very well done. However the film's script lacks a bit in terms of memorable, effective suspense that actually works. I liked the film overall, however I felt that compared to other Argento works, it was nowhere near as good as his later films. As far as the Giallo is concerned, this is a good addition to the genre, but one that could have been much better than what it turned out to be. Nonetheless, this is must see viewing for Argento fans, and it definitely is a good conclusion to his first trilogy of films, the Animal trilogy. His Three mothers trilogy would be much better and would become some of the finest works of Italian horror cinema. If you're looking for a good Giallo, then give this one a shot. However his masterpiece of the Giallo, Deep Red would be a tad better than this. Despite the flaws of this picture, I liked it, and thought it was a pretty interesting idea. However it was one that could have been reworked a bit to make it much better than what it turned out to be. Enjoyable for what it is, this is Argento finding his niche in the horror genre, and he would craft one of the finest Giallo with Deep Red. This film is good, and manages to be entertaining, but you are left wanting more out of the film, especially considering that this was filmed by Dario Argento.
Dreams of someone being decapitated with a sword, a photographer in the balconies with the head of a puppet, and a victim's eyeball being studied by police with a special camera that can capture the last image seen with that eyeball are a few visuals in this film that you just remember. Dario Argento has his signature on these unique shots that make his work seem like painting after painting.
This film is the third of Argento's "animal trilogy"; and what a way to end it, with flies...
Four Flies on Grey Velvet is Dario Argento's rarest genre film. It completes the Animal Trilogy and is the movie that preceded the magnificent Deep Red. Having never been officially available on video or DVD, Four Flies remains a bit of an enigma. It's fair to say that it is not an entirely successful movie - it has serious flaws in story and acting - however, it showcases early stylistic experimentation by Argento. And, as such, is an important entry of giallo cinema.
The story involves a rock drummer who accidentally kills a man and is drawn into a web of murder by a masked assassin who appears to have a vendetta against him.
The opening credit sequence is a memorable affair, incorporating pounding drums and close ups of a beating heart. This title sequence, however, is a good indicator of the inconsistencies of the film we are about to see, as included within this impressive opening is a silly section involving a fly that irritates rock drummer Brandon. The inclusion of this nonsense is an early example of one of the films major weaknesses - the comedy. It is never funny. We have a completely unfunny postman, a guru fisherman God who says absolutely nothing of interest at any point and a man with a moustache who tells a succession of abysmally unfunny stories to an audience of giggling women. Argento has never had flair for comedy, it's just not his arena and this film shows why. Imagine how bad a giallo directed by Woody Allen would be, well that's how bad comedy directed by Argento is.
But onwards and upwards. Thankfully he handles the suspense scenes very well indeed. We have the bizarre opening murder in the theatre witnessed by a highly creepy masked figure. A scary scene involving a girl hiding in a cupboard while the killer stalks outside. A sleazy episode in the underground. And, best of all, an excellent set-piece where a woman suddenly realises that she is alone in a menacing empty park that was previously filled with children and haunting carousel music playing over the tannoy. Four Flies is predominantly an exercise in suspense as all of these well handled sequences testify. The violence is restrained even for giallos of the period. Argento more than makes up for this with stylistic flourishes like the nice camera pan of the phone wires leading to the location of the killer, the shots of Michael Brandon driving his car quickly edited together with his subsequent POV approach to the private investigator's office and the deranged asylum flashback scenes. The movie is well shot with a number of inventive jump edits and unusual angles, giving a taste of Argento's films to come.
However, all of these excellent elements are strung together by a somewhat ridiculous plot. There are certainly holes here, for example, how could the newspapers report finding the body of the dead man if he's not actually dead?! And as for the 'four flies' revelation near the end, well I won't spoil it for anyone who hasn't seen the movie but it really is quite ridiculous. And the killer's motivations are, to say the least, uneven. The acting, too, is not helpful. Sadly, Michael Brandon resembles a plank of wood for the majority of his screen-time. His acting range stretches from 'a bit bored' to 'quite annoyed'. He certainly doesn't help draw the viewer in. And where Brandon under-acts, Mimsy Farmer over-acts. It makes for quite unusual viewing when they are on screen together. There is a lack of chemistry here for sure. In general, the exposition scenes are a bit clunky throughout the movie. And we even have a bit of unintentional humour in the exchanges between Brandon and the homosexual private investigator. If you turned the movie on at this point you could be forgiven for thinking you were watching Carry On Giallo.
The music is variable. This was the first movie where Argento incorporated rock music. From here on he would use it extensively. Similar to the rock music provided by future collaborators Goblin, the rock music here is strange, except here it is not strange in a good way. The vocalist sounds like a deaf man trying to copy Robert Plant. It's grim. And it's by Ennio Morricone so it's a bit of a shock but fortunately he also provides some good avant-garde jazzy compositions too. Much better.
Overall, despite its short-falls, Four Flies on Grey Velvet is too interesting a giallo movie to be disregarded. It is a key experimental work in Argento's cannon. It may be flimsy of plot and misguided of humour but, as is the way with giallo cinema, these elements have to be weighed against the more sensory aspects - the visuals, the music, the atmosphere. And happily, there is more than enough good to outweigh the bad.
Working on his rock group, Roberto Tobias, (Michael Brandon) finds that a strange man is stalking him, and after he shows up at their rehearsal, goes into an old theater and is dealt with in a violent and bloody manner. When he spots a masked man in the area photographing the incident, his wife Nina, (Mimsy Farmer) trusts him only to have evidence of the matter turn up against him, forcing him into the clutches of Nina's cousin Dalia, (Francine Racette) who believes his story. When the masked figure suddenly starts rampaging around the city murdering his friends, he enlists the help of private eye Gianni Arrosio, (Jean-Pierre Marielle) to help him out, as he feels that it has to be someone who knows him in order to commit the crimes. Not knowing who to trust as the murders start getting more personal, he tries to figure out the culprit before it's too late.
To begin here this is a really interesting and enjoyable giallo that has some good moments. One of the big things this one does right is that there's a rather inventive and creative storyline that this one has. The fact that this one starts out with the killer appearing to merely blackmail the man, only for the switch to come over and soon begin to target him actively, to the point of taking out those who are around him like most of the usual giallos. That allows the beginning to be pretty creepy as it mainly centers around what the next phase of the torture will be. From the first encounter in the house, where the threat is given to the later scenes with the killer actually on the loose. As the body count starts to rise, autopsy surgeons a progressive possibility for pinning the killer is mentioned. Apparently old wives' tale about eyes retaining the last image they see like a camera registers in the brain for a few hours following death is used and this is where the use of a camera will be involved in rescuing the images from a corpse's severed head that leads to the fully developed image of four flies in succession is revealed. It's a spectacular image and an ingenious use which comes from it's creativity and ingenuity. Another great factor is the film's incredibly fun and creepy stalking scenes. One of the best examples is where a victim smokes a cigarette inside a park, waiting to meet the film's killer. Against a backdrop of birds gathering behind her oblivious to it all, the slowly approaching shadows, which as well goes unnoticed due to the unreliability of the character's sight-line at the time. Once the park's gate closes, there's nothing to save her, allowing the killer to sneak up and engage in an all-out classic of a chase as the twisting and turning within the corridors reveals. As the end draws near with a dead-end and the call for help against those on the other side of the wall, it becomes all the creepier and better for the brilliant set-up. There's another one later inside a bedroom that leads to hiding inside a giant cabinet. As the light beams in from outside, reflected across the victim's face, leaving a memorable image, it really foreshadows the spectacular death to follow. The film's most accomplished scene (my opinion) is the love scene between Diane and Roberto. That scene is kind cute and sweet. It s rare that you see Argento go that way. Along with the great imagery, it makes for a really good giallo however its not perfect and of course has a few flaws, one of the biggest is that there's a little struggle early on to get the film going. The slow pace is mainly accomplished through the different amount of characters that have nothing to do with the story who are put there only to give red herrings, as the more people we met with the more they seem like potential suspects. Only this ploy doesn't work and it instead just wastes time rather than doing anything that could be interpreted as making good use of the film's running time. That is also taken up with the police detective angle, which has a lot more time in here using it to investigate the matter rather than the actual work being described, as for a giallo this one has a really low body count that does have an impact on how it works. The ending is also a little confusing, mainly because the motives don't make any sense and the revelation doesn't make any logical rationale for what's going on, but instead, that's a giallo staple and almost all have them. Otherwise, the main one is the slow pacing to it.
In the end this is recommended to giallo fans and of course fans of Dario Argento.
There are no approved quotes yet for this movie.