Tower

Audience Reviews

View More

Oaklee D @ODie63 Aug 7, 2026 A emotional documentary about the events in 1966 that proves everyone has a story and that heroes can rise from the most horrific circumstances. See more

Robert W @DrRobW Oct 24, 2024 This is one of my favorite documentaries and it should have been nominated for an Oscar. See more

Kyle M @RT77296778 Jul 1, 2023 On August 1, 1966, college life in the University of Texas turned dark. Fifteen bright futures, including an unborn, were taken away. Shots been fired high above all, emitting from the top floor in the University Tower as Charles Whitman held the campus hostage for 96 minutes. Mentally ill due to a cancerous diagnosis to the brain that gave him violent impulses, leading him to [additionally] kill fifteen, wound 31, and shook the nation. Rejuvenated interest surrounding the tragedy published upon the 40th anniversary by Pamela Colloff for the Texas Monthly, and it caught Keith Maitland's attention, inspired to put it in a filmic portrait. Structured by existing archival footage, pieced by rotoscoping animation, and told by witnesses, heroes and survivors, "Tower" is a captivating documentary that not only recounts the incident with factual thoroughness and compose with existing, archival accounts, it's a transportive immersion. Whether or not you're aware of what happened, this documentary proved effective in erasing what you thought you knew and bringing you into the scene, sharing the affecting anxiety radiating from those perspectives as they're being shared and animated by rotoscoping. The rotoscoped pieces complete the vivid reality limitedly caught via the archival footage, as well keeps the realism aspect rather than re-enact it as it could dare uncannily, or it could take away the contextual symbolism it features. It eventually transitions near the end when we meet the living survivors as they detail – a couple of them actually meet – how the experience affected them and what meaning it brought. As part of the economic filmmaking, as Maitland based the produced pictures from captured imagery on-sight to green screen in his backyard, the localized casting was tasked to provide additional voices and set up physical appearances for the selective eyewitness accounts from pivotal angles. They truly captured the tonal shifts back then out of respect for who they're representing before we actually meet the real persons that were traumatized by haunted memory. What really furthered the profound overall effect is how Maitland connected the horrific event by the ripple effects it's caused that are certainly still shaking the nation, but more so for communities. The timely topical discourse circles back to the probable origin of those ripples that were deemed unthinkable, now it's a terrifying occurrence that could happen anytime when mentalities are violently unpredictable. "Tower" brought broader attention to Maitland's directorial craftsmanship, who debuted in now-compelling "The Eyes of Me", and ideally the awareness of the darkly imprinted aura in front of the University Tower within its gloomy shadow. Surely devastating to relive, but really think about how it effectively transports under unexpected immersion by such a small-crafted scope to make a unique documentary with peaked coverage over a subject told chronologically. (A-) See more

Jeffrey P @vanillavoodoo1 Aug 24, 2022 A blend of animation and actual footage and other footage of the time from a mass shooting at the university of Texas in 1966. While it is an interesting blend of styles, I'm not sure what they were gong for because it was far less hard hitting with the animation... or maybe we're just desensitized to this sort of thing in 2022. To me it seemed like an animated documentary trying to not be a documentary and... I just couldn't connect with that. See more

Sep 29, 2020 It's a unique combination of rotoscoped action and historical footage, never seen anything like that before. Not a 5* review, because the overall drama was broken into a mosaic of personal tragedies and braveries, for which I lacked sentiment. But from an academic perspective, bravo. See more

Sep 22, 2020 A beautiful piece of art set to one of the darkest days of the Sixties. And one that would become all to familiar. See more

Read all reviews

Tower

My Rating

Read More Read Less WRITE A REVIEW EDIT REVIEW POST RATING