Anacondas: The Hunt for the Blood Orchid - Movie Reviews - Rotten Tomatoes

Anacondas: The Hunt for the Blood Orchid Reviews

Page 1 of 7
Philip Martin
Arkansas Democrat-Gazette
September 7, 2004
Some people say nature is a good thing, something that ought to be encouraged. These people are stupid and should shut up.
| Original Score: D
Top Critic
Roger Ebert
Chicago Sun-Times
August 27, 2004
I've seen Anaconda, and, senator, Anacondas is no Anaconda.
Full Review | Original Score: 2/4
Scott Nash
Three Movie Buffs
September 30, 2005
Full Review | Original Score: 2.5/4
Larry Carroll
August 27, 2004
The CGI snakes are so blatantly computer-based that you expect them to occasionally pause and say 'You've got mail!
Full Review | Original Score: C-
Phil Villarreal
Arizona Daily Star
August 27, 2004
Each time the anaconda slithers his head into the frame, you smile because the big snake gotta eat, meaning one more irritating character is about to receive the bloody end.
Full Review | Original Score: 2/4
David Foucher
EDGE Boston
August 25, 2004
I suppose it could have been worse: it could have been longer.
Full Review | Original Score: D-
Top Critic
Ellen Fox
Chicago Tribune
August 26, 2004
It's little better or worse than the original. But, to be honest, the original -- minus its nascent stars -- wasn't very good.
Full Review | Original Score: 2/4
Scott Weinberg
August 26, 2004
A Giant Snake movie that's bereft of thrills, chills, blood & guts is a sorry flick indeed. And don't even get me started on the snakes.
Full Review | Original Score: 2/5
Top Critic
Richard Roeper
Ebert & Roeper
August 30, 2004
This movie looks like it was no fun to make. It certainly was no fun to watch.
Anton Bitel
Movie Gazette
October 30, 2004
these creatures attack strictly one at a time, so that Anacondas misses every opportunity to live up to its titular promise.
Eric D. Snider
August 30, 2004
This movie features a scene of a snake chasing a monkey, which is more than I dared hope for.
Full Review | Original Score: D
Brian Orndorf
September 6, 2004
Full Review | Original Score: C+
Kit Bowen
August 26, 2004
You know exactly what you're getting into when you sit down to watch a movie in which there is not only one but many giant super snakes...Please tell me you know.
Full Review | Original Score: .5/4
David Cornelius
December 20, 2004
This is a film that manages to take what should have been delirious camp fun and turn it into a struggle to keep any remote interest.
Full Review | Original Score: 1/5
Felix Vasquez Jr.
Cinema Crazed
April 29, 2009
It's a bad movie, really bad, and in the end I was just baffled that this was actually made.
Peter Sobczynski
Critic Doctor
August 26, 2004
So pointless and forgettable that you can hardly believe that someone was actually paid to come up with it and someone else was actually paid to greenlight it.
Jeffrey Westhoff
Northwest Herald (Crystal Lake, IL)
August 27, 2004
Long before the snakes appear we're already on their side.
Full Review| Original Score: 1.5/4
Willie Waffle
August 26, 2004
It's not very good, but you can get some laughs out of it. And, show this monkey the Oscar! He's better than the human actors in the film!
Full Review | Original Score: 2/4
Uri Lessing
July 25, 2005
The character development is as thin as shed snakeskin.
Full Review | Original Score: 2/5
Jeremiah Kipp
Slant Magazine
August 25, 2004
Who will the snake kill off first: the African-American comic relief guy, the nerves-of-steel heroine, or the treacherous British professor? Take a wild guess.
Full Review | Original Score: 1/4
Michael Szymanski
December 19, 2004
Mark Harris
Georgia Straight
September 4, 2004
Urban Cinefile Critics
Urban Cinefile
October 18, 2008
August 28, 2004
Top Critic

St. Louis Post-Dispatch
August 28, 2004

Boston Phoenix
September 4, 2004
November 2, 2004
Top Critic

Houston Chronicle
July 21, 2005
Top Critic

Time Out
November 16, 2011
Page 1 of 7