Analyze That Reviews

Page 1 of 6
January 10, 2016
just weak
May 28, 2010
More than any other Robert De Niro film, invites the speculation that the once-revered actor has become the gimmicky comic screenwriter's whipping boy. [Blu-ray]
January 31, 2009
The end credit outtake reel feels like a desperate bid to rescue the dud ending and make the moviegoers leave with a smile.
July 23, 2007
No longer has the elements of surprise and novelty in its favor.
December 6, 2005
June 23, 2004
Aren't we all just a little tired of De Niro's clownish schtick and Crystal as his nattering sidekick?
March 16, 2004
February 24, 2004
While it's fun to see DeNiro poke fun at the image that he's helped make so famous, the film just doesn't have enough of a storyline to keep your interest
September 27, 2003
And the winner of the most Disappointing Sequel of 2002 Award goes to Analyze That.
June 22, 2003
The jokes are often one-note and not pushed to their limit.
May 8, 2003
...a bland comedy that seeks primarily to please its established audience and attempts to break little new ground.
April 7, 2003
No dia em que aceitou dirigir esta continuao, Harold Ramis deve ter sado da cama com o p esquerdo. E aqueles que decidiram assistir a este filme tambm.
April 5, 2003
. . .a pale and languid thing that rarely rises to the level of mildly amusing as characters with essentially nothing to do putter about on screen. . .
March 5, 2003
Forget about it.
March 3, 2003
'Es el claro ejemplo de una cinta que comienza muy fuerte y termina muy floja, como una cinta ms del montn.'
March 1, 2003
February 24, 2003
The film just doesn't have enough ideas to sustain a 100 minute movie...
February 18, 2003
There's more life in a mortuary than in Harold Ramis' laboured direction, the script creaks through 95 minutes as if they were 180, with no joke too obvious, cheap, or derivative.
February 17, 2003
February 11, 2003
Billy Crystal and Robert De Niro sleepwalk through vulgarities in a sequel you can refuse.
Page 1 of 6