Arthur 2: On the Rocks - Movie Reviews - Rotten Tomatoes

Arthur 2: On the Rocks Reviews

Page 1 of 2
March 26, 2009
Not as classy a farce as the original, but still manages to be an amusing romp for most of its length.
October 10, 2005
Doesn't have as many big laughs as the classic 1981 original, but the characters are still likable enough for this to merit a passing grade.
| Original Score: 3/5
September 6, 2005
Y'know, I gotta side with the first Arthur movie, but this wasn't painful in any particular way.
Read More | Original Score: 3/5
June 24, 2015
The excruciating "Arthur 2 on the Rocks" should come with a surgeon general's warning: "This sort of stupidity may sap your will to live or to watch movies ever again."
June 24, 2015
A romantic comedy with a fatal flaw: it's rarely funny.
Full Review | Original Score: 1/5
June 24, 2015
Believe it or not, things get even worse as the film moves towards its predictable happy ending. You have been warned.
Full Review | Original Score: 1/5
April 9, 2011
...one of the most underwhelming sequels in cinematic history.
Full Review | Original Score: 2/4
March 25, 2011
It would have been better for Warners to have left well enough alone.
Full Review | Original Score: 4/10
April 8, 2008
Unnecessary sequel to now politically incorrect comedy of alcoholism. Great cast, however.
Read More | Original Score: 2/5
June 24, 2006
As funny as a cerebral haemorrhage.
August 9, 2005
Read More | Original Score: 2/5
February 10, 2005
Read More | Original Score: 2/5
October 31, 2003
Read More | Original Score: 2/5
August 12, 2003
Bad, bad sequel to an over-hyped original.
| Original Score: 1/5
July 2, 2003
Read More | Original Score: 1/5
May 20, 2003
A doughy, unimaginative spin-off beyond any saving by its two resourceful stars.
May 6, 2003
This film never happened. Don't ask me about it again.
| Original Score: 0/5
August 22, 2002
Another unnecessary sequel.
| Original Score: 2/5
July 26, 2002
A candidate for all time worst sequel.
| Original Score: 0/5
Page 1 of 2