Batman Begins - Movie Reviews - Rotten Tomatoes

Batman Begins Reviews

Page 1 of 14
August 24, 2017
Batman Begins isn't a terrible film, it simply isn't that good. Overly long, vaguely goofy in places, and straining for gravity and dignity, it's the dignity part that is hard.
June 18, 2012
Compared to the flashier Superman, the dark knight was always more human and prone to brooding, but this film is way out of whack.
June 16, 2005
There's nothing particularly wrong with Begins, but in a way, that's exactly what's wrong with it.
Full Review | Original Score: 3/5
June 15, 2005
When you shine too much light, you take away the shadows. And without those, the Dark Knight is just a guy in a rubber suit mugging muggers.
Read More | Original Score: 3/5
June 9, 2005
The movie slowly moves away from being an engaging film about people and starts to fit itself into the mold of every other dumb action movie you've ever seen.
Full Review | Original Score: 6.5/10
May 15, 2006
Where the movie fails, ultimately and sadly, is in its capitulation to conventional action movie wisdom.
Read More | Original Score: 79/100
June 12, 2005
But there's no auteurist signature, no idiosyncratic imprint, on the film that distinctly marks it as a work of Nolan's, and thus it feels vaguely impersonal and remote.
Full Review | Original Score: 2/4
June 5, 2005
There is talent and cleverness here, but not much excitement.
March 26, 2007
A fragmented tale with a disconnect between sulking mood pieces and hi-tech urban warfare, whose logic always seems to be beside the point.
Full Review
April 14, 2013
Nolan takes an admirable stab at developing a character-driven drama, only to give in to generic action-movie conventions with a blinding, deafening, explosion-laden finale that could have capped off any number of interchangeable Jerry Bruckheimer flicks.
June 15, 2005
After much unnecessary padding and delay, the film settles down to...a thinly veiled and thoroughly trivialized reworking of 9/11.
June 16, 2005
Should we comment on the horrendous Batmobile? You probably saw the trailer, so there is no need.
Read More | Original Score: 2.5/5
June 14, 2005
Aims for mythical grandeur, underlined leadenly by a pseudo-Wagnerian orchestral score, only to become mired in pretension to Jungian psychological veracity
June 14, 2005
The pragmatic reinvention...is countered by several equally pedestrian blunders that hold the film back as if Nolan and Goyer were standing on the back of Batman's cape.
Full Review | Original Score: 2.5/4
June 7, 2005
[Nolan's] effort is not dishonorable, but what it needs, and doesn't have, is a Joker in the deck-some antic human antimatter to give it the giddy lift of perversity that a bunch of impersonal explosions, no matter how well managed, can't supply.
June 14, 2005
It's still an old-school superhero summer movie, the plotting tortuous, the characters relegated to one-scene-one-emotion simplicity, the digitized action a never ending club mix of chases and mano a manos.
June 14, 2005
No fan of cult director Christopher Nolan is going to regard this respectable effort as anything but a comedown from 2001's Memento.
Full Review | Original Score: 2.5/4
June 14, 2005
It's all a little disappointing, particularly given the talents involved.
Read More | Original Score: 2.5/4
June 14, 2005
Maybe, now that this version of the franchise has drained itself of explanatory residue, the next chapter will have more bounce.
Read More | Original Score: 2.5/4
June 15, 2005
Is it too much to ask that the action sequences not be monotonously, narcotizingly dull?
Read More | Original Score: 2.5/4
Page 1 of 14