Bram Stoker's Dracula - Movie Reviews - Rotten Tomatoes

Bram Stoker's Dracula Reviews

February 7, 2018
Coppola's remake throws so much fancy technique at its story that the usually foolproof drama at its core gets drowned in a tide of images. It's not scary, it's not suspenseful and its eroticism is largely theoretical.
October 20, 2009
This luscious film restores the creature's nobility and gives him peace.
September 26, 2007
Overall, this Dracula could have been less heavy and more deliciously evil than it is, but it does offer a sumptuous engorgement of the senses.
September 26, 2007
A somewhat dispersed and overcrowded story line that remains fascinating and often affecting thanks to all its visual and conceptual energy.
Top Critic
January 26, 2006
This lack of a convincing central dynamic leads to the occasional sense that the film is little more than a spectacular edifice, but you'll be too spellbound to resist seduction.
May 20, 2003
With Dracula it's apparent that Mr. Coppola's talent and exuberance survive.
Full Review | Original Score: 3.5/5
January 1, 2000
It is Coppola's most lavish and, certainly, his most flamboyant film; never before has he allowed himself this kind of mad experimentation.
January 1, 2000
The movie is an exercise in feverish excess, and for that if for little else, I enjoyed it.
Full Review | Original Score: 3/4
January 1, 2000
In Bram Stoker's Dracula, director Francis Ford Coppola wins endless vam-Pyrrhic victories but loses the narrative war.
November 13, 1992
Oldman is so vivid and funny as the cackling, centuries-old Dracula that we look forward to seeing what he'll do in the London scenes.
Full Review | Original Score: B-