Wrath of the Titans - Movie Reviews - Rotten Tomatoes

Wrath of the Titans Reviews

Page 2 of 300
October 17, 2015
Strictly action. Wrath of Titans epic effects are some of the best I'd ever seen and for that, 3 stars!
Lack of story but it's okay.
Super Reviewer
½ October 12, 2015
Even worse than the lame first movie, with the same tasteless hero, hideous dialogue, endless action scenes with no energy or tension and a terrible script that throws in several mythological elements without any coherence - and it is sad to see Ramirez totally wasted in this mess.
½ August 25, 2015
To call the plot structure incoherent and disjointed would be an understatement. It's a boring, poorly written and terribly acted CGI-fest that will put you off going to the cinema during the summer months.

August 21, 2015
Visually-stunning fantasy adventure is undoubtedly a major improvement on its disappointing predecessor.
August 3, 2015
While the action sequences are great, Wrath of the Titans is a meaningless film that simply makes no sense
½ July 25, 2015
With eye popping visual effects and some cool set pieces, Wrath of the Titans is worth a watch as long as you turn your brain off, so you can ignore the cliche script and some questionable acting
June 14, 2015
An improvement over the first but still a mess of a movie with some nice effects.
½ June 2, 2015
You've got a paper thin plot which doesn't make a lot of sense and average special effects, but it's still fun.
June 1, 2015
Fun summer popcorn film, which does a very solid job at being just that! Granted, the story is not the deepest, but it's never boring. The action & special effects are both very well done, entertaining, and plentyfull. The actors do a pretty solid job, and the score sounds really good.
May 26, 2015
flixter rip off bought films by redeemed voucher card and downloaded on memory card and device and cant watch thats £50 flixter ows me
½ May 18, 2015
I hate when filmmakers create a sequel to a film that is a remake. It's bad enough that you aren't talented enough to have an original idea, but then you turn around and make a sequel to a remake? To be fair, unlike "Clash of the Titans", "Wrath of the Titans" is an original story with little basis in mythology. However, also unlike "Clash of the Titans", "Wrath of the Titans" is not an enjoyable film.

This film has many problems. The action seems more mindless and generic. The story is not as interesting as that of the first film. And the CGI can be really great at some times, and god awful (pun intended) at others.

Additionally, Sam Worthington does not give as strong a performance as before, and Liam Neeson and Ralph Fiennes' roles are so small that they offer little to the film. Bill Nighy has a fun little part as Hephaestus, and it's about the only enjoyable part of the film.

You could say that "Wrath of the Titans" is bad because of poor writing, acting, or directing. I like to think of it as the wrath of karma!
Super Reviewer
May 17, 2015
Or, "she works hard for the money", cause that's all this one amounts to, a grab for cash. Some of that CGI money could've been spent on the writers, but noooo. And you get what you pay for. Rosamund Pike though adds needed verve to the proceedings.
May 16, 2015
It feels as if the staff working on this film all unanimously agreed to divide into groups over a burrito at Taco Bell. Each group then agreed to work on a different part of the film and meet back at the same crappy Taco Bell, on the same crappy day of the week, to eat the same crappy burritos and puzzle all the scenes together and hope it turns out a masterpiece. They never watched it and decided it was great without fine-tuning and premiered it. Or... the director purposefully made worthington unlikable. I was rooting for Cronus the entire screening.
½ May 9, 2015
This movie was good it's not that bad but I think everybody should give this a try.
April 14, 2015
This movie is better than the first. It's not a good movie by any means, but it wasn't bad, and didn't waste my time. It's worth seeing on TV when you have time on your hands.
½ April 6, 2015
Much Improved Interpretation Of Story (From Last Attempt) & Good Mix Of Action-CGI Definitely Make This The More Watchable Remake. Worthington Appeared To Improve His Acting This Time Round..But He Still Had Some Blandness...Acting With Seasoned Pro's Prolly Washed Off On Him.
½ April 5, 2015
did they really need to make this movie ...
½ April 4, 2015
the 1st was way better,the effects is the only thing that saved this one
½ April 4, 2015
the 1st was way better,the effects is the only thing that saved this one
½ March 19, 2015
So honestly i find the movie a little to say, action packed, which draws from the story line, however i do enjoy the visual effects, and the cast of this movie, in my opinion this movie is a step up from the first, and finally the professional critics of this movie critique without stating what is wrong and show only general distaste due to there disinterest in the first of the series, quite frankly i thoroughly agree with ign's review however.
Page 2 of 300