Watch it now
News & Interviews for C.O.G.
Critic Reviews for C.O.G.
Modest and good-looking, the film starts as dark comedy and ends in pathos. Director Alvarez makes the Oregon scenery a character unto itself.
People who approach it as a film in its own right, with its own rhythms and goals and pleasures, will be amply rewarded.
Despite smatterings of wit and a stable of skilled performers, "C.O.G." struggles to find a consistent tone, its episodic structure veering from farcical to poignant to dangerously raw.
a dramedy that keeps you guessing where the main character is going (emotionally and physically) as he drifts from one odd situation to the next.
The film features snappy, hilarious bits among the coming-of-age vignettes, but it loses momentum as it winds toward a finish. You won't grow bored with the characters, but you might check your watch a few times.
Audience Reviews for C.O.G.
There are three reasons you would want to watch this film: 1. the main character is played by the very talented Jonathan Groff of Broadway and "Glee" fame. 2. You love the prose of David Sedaris, and seeing as how this film is based off of one of his essays, you are swooning in happiness that this film exists. 3. You love both, like I do. Read more at http://www.bluefairyblog.com/reviews/2015/4/8/cog
The awful score is so off-putting and the film unapologetically ambiguous about its intentions (which are never made exactly clear), as though just to place Groff's character from HBO TV series Looking - cocky, awkward and easily intimidated - in this sort of situation and not go anywhere from there.
I really like Groff's, O'Hare's, and Stoll's performances as well as the film's consistent pitch black tone, I just wish that the ending wasn't so abrupt.
|Jon:||The bible says -|
|Samuel:||I know what the bible says|
|Jon:||Well then what's your problem with it ?|
|Samuel:||It's poorly written|
|Hobbs:||You speak a little Spanish?|
|Hobbs:||They didn't teach you that in college ?|
|Samuel:||I studied Japanese|
|Hobbs:||What the fuck for ?!|